- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06286345
Lifestyle InterVEntion Study in General Practice: LIVES - GP (LIVES-GP)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Rationale: Patients with depression are at a substantially increased risk of chronic physical disease including cardiovascular disease. This may be attributed primarily to an unhealthy lifestyle related to their disorder. Interestingly, the unhealthy lifestyle feeds back to decreased quality of life and increased depressive symptoms, thus creating a hazardous vicious circle. Consequently, there is a great potential for 'Lifestyle Medicine' for depression. Yet, it is known that patients with depression often have motivational and self-management problems. Therefore a multimodal lifestyle intervention (MLI) specifically tailored to the needs of depressed patients was developed and piloted in mental health care, with promising results. This research aims to investigate this MLI in general practice because this is the setting where the majority of patients with depression are treated and results from mental health care are unlikely to apply.
Objective: to estimate in general practice the feasibility of conducting a large-scale study on the effectiveness of a MLI for depression, and identify key factors that can influence its successful conduct. In addition, this study aims to obtain an estimate of the variance of outcome measures (mental health, lifestyle factors, functioning, recovery, wellbeing, sleeping quality, self-esteem, quality of life, health care costs, anthropometry and blood pressure).
Study design: An observational single-group prospective cohort study (n = 50) using mixed methods with baseline measurement and two follow-up measurements: after the intervention at 18 weeks and after a follow-up at 42 weeks.
Study population: Patients (18 years or over) with depression and overweight who are being treated in general practice.
Intervention (if applicable): A MLI named (in Dutch) "Gecombineerde Leefstijl Interventie Leef" (GLI-LEEF), developed for patients with depression consisting of several modules (e.g. on physical activity, healthy diet) comprising both individual and group sessions.
Main study parameters/endpoints: implementation feasibility using three of the elements of the 'Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance' (RE-AIM) framework for process evaluation (i.e. Reach, Adoption and Implementation)
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Huibert Burger, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 6722 +31(0)50 361 6722
- Email: h.burger@umcg.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jolien A Panjer, MD
- Phone Number: 6722 +31(0)50 361 6722
- Email: j.a.panjer@umcg.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Groningen, Netherlands, 9700 AD
- Recruiting
- University Medical Center Groningen
-
Contact:
- Huibert Burger, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 6722 +31(0)50 361 6722
- Email: h.burger@umcg.nl
-
Contact:
- Patrick Brink
- Phone Number: 6724 +31(0)50 361 6724
- Email: p.brink@umcg.nl
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of depressive symptoms or depressive disorder in the past year as registered in the general practice electronic health record and coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) as P03 and P76, respectively, or currently treated for depressive symptoms or depressive disorder in general practice.
- At least mild depressive symptom level according to the Quick Inventory Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) (score ≥6)
- Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 or increased waist circumference (>88 cm (women) of >102 cm (men)).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current treatment in mental health care (GGZ in Dutch)
- Severe somatic / neurological disease at the discretion of the GP
- Currently participating in another lifestyle intervention
- Insufficient proficiency in Dutch
- Inability to read and write
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reach of GLI-LEEF
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Reach of GLI-LEEF as defined as the number of individuals who are willing to participate in this study
|
12 months
|
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF
Time Frame: 12 months
|
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of general practices that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
|
12 months
|
General practitioner adoption of GLI-LEEF
Time Frame: 12 months
|
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of general practitioners that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
|
12 months
|
Lifestyle coach adoption of GLI-LEEF
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Lifestyle coach adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of lifestyle coaches that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
|
12 months
|
Adherence to GLI-LEEF
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
First aspect of implementation is adherence to GLI-LEEF which is defined by the number of sessions attended by the participant out of the total of 18 sessions
|
18 weeks
|
Drop-out from GLI-LEEF
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Second aspect of implementation is drop-out from GLI-LEEF which is defined by the proportion of participants who decide to prematurely stop taking part in the intervention
|
18 weeks
|
Barriers and facilitators of the GLI-LEEF implementation
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Potential barriers and facilitators of the GLI-LEEF implementation will be identified using a qualitative approach by interviewing approximately 10 participants who dropped out and 10 who completed GLI-LEEF, if opportune
|
18 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Body height of the participant as assessed by a stadiometer
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Body height in meters
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Body weight of the participant as assessed by a medical weight scale
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Body weight in kilograms
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Waist circumference of the participant as assessed using a tape meter line
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Waist circumference in centimeters
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Diastolic and systolic blood pressure as assessed using a sphygmomanometer
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Diastolic and systolic blood pressure in millimeters mercury
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Recovery of the participant according to the Individual Recovery Outcomes - Counter (I.ROC)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The I.ROC is an instrument to quantitatively measure recovery.
The total score runs from 12 to 72.
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Wellbeing as assessed by the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The MHC-SF measures emotional, social and psychological wellbeing.
Its total score runs from 0 to 20.
Higher score means better outcome.
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Self esteem according to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The RSES is a widely used self-report instrument for evaluating individual self-esteem.
The total score runs from 0 to 30.
Higher score means worse outcome, i.e. less self-esteem.
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Insomnia according to the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The ISI assesses insomnia.
The total score runs from 0 to 28.
Higher score means worse outcome.
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Quality of life according to the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQol)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
This is a Patient Reported Outcome Measure assesses the quality of life for people with different mental health conditions.
Its score runs from 0 to 80. Higher score means better outcome.
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Health care consumption and productivity loss according to the Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders (TIC-P)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The TiC - P assesses health care consumption and productivity loss in patients with mental illness
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Treatment success on several domains by according to the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-=45)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The OQ-45 runs from 0 to 180.
The lower the score, the more successful treatment
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 17644
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases
-
Medical College of WisconsinRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Cardiovascular Risk Factor | Cardiovascular HealthUnited States
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaCompleted
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular Risk FactorsUnited States
-
Women's College HospitalUniversity Health Network, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Brigham... and other collaboratorsUnknownCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESCanada, United States
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephTerminatedCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESFrance
-
University of FloridaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham; Brown UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Psychosocial Influence on Cardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingCardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Baptist Health South FloridaUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Quest Diagnostics-Nichols InsituteActive, not recruitingCardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Laval UniversityActive, not recruitingCardiovascular DiseaseCanada
-
Penn State UniversityCalifornia Healthcare InstituteCompleted
Clinical Trials on GLI-LEEF
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcNational MS Foundation, The Netherlands; Voeding LeeftRecruiting
-
Leiden University Medical CenterMedical Center Haaglanden; Voeding LeeftActive, not recruitingFatigue | Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesNetherlands