Examination of Neuromotor Development of Cases Diagnosed With Scaphocephaly

February 28, 2024 updated by: Ilayda Sozeri, Acıbadem Atunizade Hospital

It's an observational study. Purpose of the study: To evaluate the neuromotor development of scaphocephaly cases.

21 infants diagnosed with scaphocephaly aged 2-17 months were included.

  • Is there any delay in the neuromotor development of scaphocephaly cases?
  • If delay is observed, in which area is it most common?

Denver-II Developmental Screening Test and Alberta Motor Infant Scale were applied to the participants.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Scaphocephaly (sagittal synostosis) is the most common single-suture craniosynostosis. It occurs as a result of premature ossification of the fibrous connective tissue extending between two parietal bones (sagittal suture). Phenotypically, a long and narrow head shape occurs. It occurs in 2-3 per 10,000 live births and is more common in men.

Premature ossification of the sagittal suture can lead to cranial deformity, potentially cranial growth restriction, and resulting increased intracranial pressure. In these cases, increased intracranial pressure and compression of the sagittal sinus cause increased venous pressure, which may cause developmental delays. These delays most commonly include cognitive impairments, language disorders, motor delays, learning disabilities, executive dysfunction, and behavioral problems.

When looking at the literature, it was seen that the studies were mostly on neurocognitive development in cases with craniosynostosis. There are relatively fewer studies focusing on the neuromotor development of these cases.

This study aims to evaluate the neuromotor development of scaphocephaly cases.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Uskudar
      • Istanbul, Uskudar, Turkey
        • Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

21 cases diagnosed with scaphocephaly aged 2-17 monts were included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having been diagnosed with scaphocephaly
  • Being between 0-18 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Be over 18 months
  • Having a diagnosed disease other than scaphocephaly

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Examination of neuromotor development of cases diagnosed with scaphocephaly
21 cases with scaphocephaly were included. Neuromotor development was evaluated with the Denver-II Developmental Screening Test and Alberta Infant Motor Scale.
21 cases with scaphocephaly diagnoses were included. Neuromotor development was evaluated with the Denver-II Developmental Screening Test and Alberta Infant Motor Scale.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Denver-II Developmental Screening Test
Time Frame: baseline
It's a screening test used in children aged 0-6 years. The test is done in a short time like 5-20 min. The person who will administer the Denver-II test; must be trained and certified. Standardized test materials are used. The test consists of 4 sections and 134 items. There are personal-social, language, fine motor and gross motor sections. The test result is classified as Normal-Abnormal-Suspicious.
baseline
Alberta Infant Motor Scale
Time Frame: baseline
It's used to observe gross motor functions and evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in typically developing infants between 0-18 months. The duration of the test is 10 min and consists of 58 items. The child's spontaneous movements are evaluated in 4 different positions without touching the child. 1 point is taken for each item that can be done. A table containing the mean and standard deviation for each month is used. The test result is classified as Normal-Abnormal-Suspicious.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be made available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Developmental Delay

Clinical Trials on Group 1

3
Subscribe