Infusion Treatments of Chronic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

March 6, 2024 updated by: Tugce Yavuz, Hacettepe University

Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ketamine and Lidocaine Infusion in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Retrospective Study

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ketamine and lidocaine infusion in patients with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain.

Patients who received intravenous ketamine infusion and the other patient group who received intravenous lidocaine infusion were evaluated in the study. Pain scores and quality of life were assessed with scales before treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study, it was aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intravenous infusion of ketamine and lidocaine, which have been known and used in pain management and which have recently increased interest in the treatment of peripheric neuropathic pain.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cankaya
      • Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey, 06360
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

For the retrospectively designed study, data (electronic database program of the hospital and files) of the patients admitted to the algology clinic with neuropathic pain symptoms between January 2021 and May 2021 were evaluated.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years of age
  • Patients with peripheral neuropathic pain (radicular neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, complex regional pain syndrome type 2, traumatic peripheral nerve injury, trigeminal neuralgia, postherpetic neuralgia)
  • Patients who was evaluated by DN4 scores with of ≥4 points

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with central nervous system disease .
  • Patients with cancer related neuropatic pain.
  • Patients with central neuropathic pain patterns.
  • Patients with renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, and psychiatric diseases.
  • Patients whose treatment could not be completed due to side effects or other reasons.
  • Patients who had lost their follow-up .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropathic Pain Scale
Time Frame: Before treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.The 7 symptoms items are scored by interviewing the patient.The scores are added and a score of 4 or more outout of ,10 point (severe pain ) is suggestive of neuropathic pain.
Neuropathic Pain 4 Questions (DN4)
Before treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.The 7 symptoms items are scored by interviewing the patient.The scores are added and a score of 4 or more outout of ,10 point (severe pain ) is suggestive of neuropathic pain.
Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: Before treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.NRS in which individuals rate their pain on an ten-point numerical scale. Zero:''no pain at all' ten-point ''severe pain''
Numeric Rating Scale
Before treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.NRS in which individuals rate their pain on an ten-point numerical scale. Zero:''no pain at all' ten-point ''severe pain''

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: Before treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.12-question survey PCS and the MCS Scores above 50 indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 suggest below-average health.
Short form-12 (SF-12)
Before treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.12-question survey PCS and the MCS Scores above 50 indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 suggest below-average health.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Gokhan Sucu, MD, Hacettepe University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Ketamine

3
Subscribe