- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06299540
Benefits of Individual Physical Activity Intervention on Health-related Quality of Life in Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (QOLIBRI)
May 15, 2024 updated by: Janssen Cilag S.A.S.
Benefits of an Individual Physical Activity Intervention on Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Receiving Ibrutinib in Real-life Practice
The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of an individual physical activity intervention (IPAI) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with first line or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) initiating ibrutinib in a routine clinical practice setting.
HRQoL will be measured using functional assessment of cancer therapy - general scale (FACT-G).
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
256
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Study Contact
- Phone Number: 844-434-4210
- Email: Participate-In-This-Study@its.jnj.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Toulouse, France, 31100
- Recruiting
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
The study population will include participants aged at least 18 years of age with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants newly treated with ibrutinib for first line or relapsed CLL (treatment is being initiated or has been initiated within the last 8 days as a maximum)
- Participants agreed to follow the individual physical activity intervention (IPAI)
- Participants using or having access to a compatible and appropriate electronic device such as smartphone, laptop or tablet
- Participants with Internet access at home and email address
- Participants agreed to wear a connected watch 24 hours a day for all the duration of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant participants or planning to become pregnant while enrolled in this study
- Participants with inability or deemed unsafe to practice physical activity
- Participants who have received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 90 days before the inclusion visit
- Participants who are currently involved in an interventional study
- Participants with probable difficulties in using the digital tool autonomously
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Group 1: Individual Physical Activity Intervention
Participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) will be invited to perform physical activity according to a predefined intervention program.
This program includes walking and weekly remote adapted physical activity sessions (2 sessions per week, the duration and difficulty of which will be adapted by the adapted physical activity [APA] trainer according to the Participant's abilities).
|
No drug will be administered as a part of this study.
The intervention will consist in an IPAI provided to participants for 6 months to practice physical activity in addition to their medical treatment in routine clinical practice settings.
IPAI will be an adaptive program and will comprise two periods, the first period consisting in a supervised 4-month program and the second one in an unsupervised 2-month program to achieve greater autonomy.
No drug will be administered as a part of this study.
Participants received ibrutinib as per their routine clinical practice settings.
|
Group 2: Standard of Care
Participants with CLL will continue physical activity according to their lifestyle and the recommendations of the medical team.
|
No drug will be administered as a part of this study.
Participants received ibrutinib as per their routine clinical practice settings.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) by Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) Total Score at Month 4.5
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 4.5
|
The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Baseline and Month 4.5
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from Baseline in HRQoL by Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Total Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5 and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
The FACT-Leu questionnaire consists of 44 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), SWB (7 items), EWB (6 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total FACT-Leu score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from Month 4.5 in HRQoL by Using FACT-Leu Total Score at Month 6.5
Time Frame: Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
|
The FACT-Leu questionnaire consists of 44 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), SWB (7 items), EWB (6 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total FACT-Leu score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
|
Change from Month 6.5 in HRQoL by Using FACT-Leu Total Score at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 6.5 and Month 12
|
The FACT-Leu questionnaire consists of 44 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), SWB (7 items), EWB (6 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total FACT-Leu score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Month 6.5 and Month 12
|
Change from Baseline in HRQoL by Using Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Total Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
The TOI questionnaire consists of 31 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total TOI score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from Month 4.5 in HRQoL by Using Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Total Score at Month 6.5
Time Frame: Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
|
The TOI questionnaire consists of 31 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total TOI score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
|
Change from Month 6.5 in HRQoL by Using Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Total Score at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 6.5 and Month 12
|
The TOI questionnaire consists of 31 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total TOI score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Month 6.5 and Month 12
|
Change from Baseline in HRQoL by Using FACT-G Scale at Month 6.5 and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Baseline, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from Month 4.5 in HRQoL by Using FACT-G Scale at Month 6.5
Time Frame: Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
|
The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
|
Change from Month 6.5 in HRQoL by Using FACT-G Scale at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 6.5 and Month 12
|
The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Month 6.5 and Month 12
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5-Point Improvement in the FACT-G Total Score at Months 4.5, 6.5, and 12 as Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items).
Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension.
Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108.
Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
The FACIT-fatigue is a questionnaire that assesses self-reported tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual activities due to fatigue.
The subscale consists of 13-item instrument to measure fatigue.
Each of the 13 items has a set of five response categories: Not at all (=0), A little bit (=1), Somewhat (=2), Quite a bit (=3) and Very much (=4).
A total FACIT-Fatigue subscale score is calculated as the sum of the 13 item scores (reserved scores [4 - score]) and ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue.
Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement of fatigue.
Items are reverse scored when appropriate to provide a scale in which higher scores represent better functioning or less fatigue.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score and Sub Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
PSQI is used to detect sleep disturbance or deficits.
It contains 19 self-rated items that are combined to form seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction The PSQI has a scoring key that can be used to calculate a participant's seven sub scores, which range from 0 to 3. The sub scores are added together to produce a "global" score that ranges from 0 to 21.
A global score of 5 or higher denotes poor sleep quality.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Time Using Connected Watch
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from baseline in total sleep time (in hours) using connected watch will be assessed.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Score Using Connected Watch
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from baseline in total sleep score (time asleep/time in bed) based on duration, regularity, depth and interruption using connected watch will be assessed.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Sleep Stages Using Connected Watch
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from baseline in sleep stages (deep/light) using connected watch will be assessed.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
The HAD scale is a 14-items measure that assesses anxiety and depressive disorders.
The scale includes seven questions related to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D).
Each item is rated from 0 to 3. Two scores are derived from the scale, one related to anxiety and the other related to depression (maximum score for each score = 21).
Higher scores indicate increased anxiety or depression.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Fitness as Measured by Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
The 6MWT is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes.
It is easy to administer, better tolerated, and more reflective of activities of daily living than the other walk tests.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity as Assessed by Number of Steps per Day Using Connected Watch
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from baseline in physical activity as assessed by number of steps per day using connected watch will be reported.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity as Assessed by the Number of Walking Sessions per Week using Connected Watch
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from baseline in physical activity as assessed by the number of walking sessions per week using connected watch will be reported.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity as Assessed by the Time of Walking Sessions per Week Using Connected Watch
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from baseline in physical activity as assessed by the time of walking sessions per week using connected watch will be reported.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity as Assessed by the Distance of Walking Sessions per Week Using Connected Watch
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Change from baseline in physical activity as assessed by the distance of walking sessions per week using connected watch will be reported.
|
Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
|
Percentage of Participants with Treatment-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 30 months
|
Percentage of participants with treatment-related adverse events especially musculoskeletal and cardiovascular treatment-related adverse events will be reported.
|
Up to 30 months
|
Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD)
Time Frame: Months 6 and 12
|
TTD is defined as the time between the first day of ibrutinib treatment and the day that ibrutinib is definitely stopped for whatever reason or death.
|
Months 6 and 12
|
Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: Up to Month 12
|
Number of participants in each reason for treatment discontinuation will be reported.
Reasons for treatment discontinuation are defined as: adverse events, lack of efficacy, patient's convenience, physician's decision, progression, death or other.
|
Up to Month 12
|
Percentage of Participants Who Still Wear the Connected Watch
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 4.5, 6.5, and 12
|
Percentage of participants who still wear the connected watch (adherence) will be assessed.
|
Months 1, 3, 4.5, 6.5, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants Retained by the Connected Watch (Start Wearing the Watch)
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 4.5, 6.5, and 12
|
Percentage of participants retained by the connected watch (start wearing the watch) will be assessed.
|
Months 1, 3, 4.5, 6.5, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants Agreed to Participate in the Study Among Eligible participants with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Initiation Ibrutinib Treatment
Time Frame: During the first 6 months (Feasibility period)
|
Percentage of participants agreed to participate in the study among eligible participants with CLL initiation ibrutinib treatment will be reported.
|
During the first 6 months (Feasibility period)
|
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants Who Still Follow the Individual Physical Activity Intervention (IPAI) Among Those Who Have Started IPAI
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 4.5, and 6.5
|
Percentage of participants who still follow the IPAI among those who have started IPAI (Adherence) in group 1 will be assessed.
|
Months 1, 3, 4.5, and 6.5
|
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants Who Follow the Adapted Physical Activity (APA) Sessions, the Walking Objectives and the APA Appointment as Scheduled With the APA Among Those Who Have Started IPAI
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 4.5, and 4.6
|
Percentage of participants who follow the adapted physical activity sessions, the walking objectives and the APA appointment as scheduled with the APA among those who have started IPAI (Compliance) in group 1 will be assessed.
|
Months 1, 3, 4.5, and 4.6
|
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants Retained by the IPAI (First APA Videoconference Attended) Among Participants Enrolled in the Study
Time Frame: Months 1 and 3
|
Percentage of participants retained by the IPAI (first APA videoconference attended) among participants enrolled in the study will be assessed.
|
Months 1 and 3
|
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants who Completed the Supervised Period Among Participants Enrolled in the Study
Time Frame: Month 4.5
|
Percentage of participants who completed the supervised period among participants enrolled in the study will be assessed.
|
Month 4.5
|
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants who Completed the Unsupervised Period Among Participants Enrolled in the Study
Time Frame: Month 6.5
|
Percentage of participants who completed the unsupervised period among participants enrolled in the study will be assessed.
|
Month 6.5
|
For Group 1: Participant Satisfaction With the IPAI Measured With the Satisfaction Likert Scale
Time Frame: Months 4.5, 6.5, and 12
|
Participant's' satisfaction will be assessed by Likert scales at Months 4.5 and 6.5 regarding coaching, proposed sessions, program content, program duration, impact on APA practice, overall satisfaction, willingness to continue and recommendation to others.
Likert scales will assess participant's' satisfaction at Month 12 regarding impact on APA practice, overall satisfaction, willingness to continue and recommendation to others.
Only one question is quantitative with score range from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (totally satisfied) for global satisfaction.
Participants are considered satisfied when score is greater than or equal to (>=) 6 and highly-satisfied when score is >=8.
All other questions are qualitative and have 5-level Likert scales including: very satisfied, rather satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, not really satisfied, not at all satisfied.
|
Months 4.5, 6.5, and 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Janssen Cilag S.A.S., France Clinical Trial, Janssen Cilag S.A.S.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 1, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
March 8, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
May 16, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 15, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Immune System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Lymphatic Diseases
- Immunoproliferative Disorders
- Disease Attributes
- Hematologic Diseases
- Leukemia, B-Cell
- Chronic Disease
- Leukemia
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
- Leukemia, Lymphoid
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
- Ibrutinib
Other Study ID Numbers
- 54179060CLL4033 (Other Identifier: Janssen-Cilag France)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Active, not recruitingLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell | Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Leukemia, Chronic Lymphatic | B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic | B-Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic | Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic, B-Cell | Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic, B Cell | Lymphocytic Leukemia...United States
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University...WithdrawnB-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedB-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaUnited States
-
French Innovative Leukemia OrganisationTerminatedB-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL)France
-
Genzyme, a Sanofi CompanyBayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc./Bayer Schering PharmaCompletedB-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL)United Kingdom, Belgium, France, United States, Czech Republic, Serbia
-
CelgeneCompletedB-cell Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaUnited States, Spain, United Kingdom, Canada, Belgium, Czechia, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Israel, Germany, Ireland, France, New Zealand, Denmark, Australia, Netherlands, Romania, Russian Federation, Sweden, Austria, South Africa, Colo... and more
-
French Innovative Leukemia OrganisationRoche Pharma AGCompletedB-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia CLLFrance
-
OnxeoCompletedB-cell Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaUnited Kingdom
-
AbbottGenentech, Inc.Withdrawn
-
Shanghai Zhangjiang Biotechnology Limited CompanySuspendedB-cell Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaChina
Clinical Trials on Individual Physical Activity Intervention (IPAI)
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompletedCoronary Disease | Hypertension | Cardiac DiseasesGermany
-
Brown UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH)Completed
-
University of ConnecticutNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Complementary and...RecruitingChronic Low Back PainUnited States
-
Institut Català d'OncologiaUnknownRecurrence | Breast NeoplasmsSpain
-
Centre Leon BerardNational Cancer Institute, FranceNot yet recruitingMetastatic Testicular CancerFrance
-
University of California, DavisActive, not recruitingBehavior, HealthUnited States
-
Jamie JacksonNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedPhysical Activity | Cardiovascular Disease OtherUnited States
-
Brown UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruiting
-
Jamie JacksonCompletedPhysical Activity | Cardiovascular Disease OtherUnited States
-
Hasselt UniversityKU Leuven; Jessa Hospital; Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg; Algemeen Ziekenhuis Vesalius; Zuyd University of Applied Sciences and other collaboratorsCompleted