- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06304831
Use of Facility Ratings to Improve Satisfaction With Heath Care for Children
Facility Ratings to Improve Satisfaction With Heath Care for Children
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
While access to health care is expanding globally, there is appreciable variation in the quality of care among providers with low-quality care accounting for up-to 5 million deaths each year. These numbers are expected to grow as more people seek care and as the burden of disease shifts to complex conditions.
Expanding access has also resulted in increasing options for public and private health care providers. Selecting a health provider or a facility, however, is difficult because timely and reliable information about providers is not readily available. People often rely on social networks or previous experiences to select providers. However, in Lao PDR, only 28% describe their recent visit to a health care provider as high-quality, suggesting that while there are increasing options for care, people may need support to find providers that meet their quality needs.
In order to inform efforts to improve people's access to high-quality care, there is a need for evidence on mechanisms to empower people to identify and use high-quality care. In LMICs, majority of efforts to date has focused on supply-side efforts. While there are new initiatives to study population perspectives and people's care experiences, measures to "ignite demand" for high-quality care are not well understood.
The investigators plan to conduct a randomized-controlled experiment using mobile-phones to study whether routinely collected information on quality of care received by peers can improve access to high-quality care and patient satisfaction. The investigators plan to study whether participants switched providers based on the information provided and the type of information mothers used to switch providers. Additionally, The investigators plan to study whether information about providers led women to be more satisfied with health care services for their child or children. Study participants will include mothers living in an urban setting with less than 2-year old children and already enrolled in an on-going VITERBI cohort in Vientiane, the capital city.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Amit Aryal, MPH
- Phone Number: +41612848953
- Email: amit.aryal@swisstph.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Emma Clarke-Deelder, PhD
- Phone Number: +41782292762
- Email: emma.clarke-deelder@swisstph.ch
Study Locations
-
-
Vientiane Capital
-
Vientiane, Vientiane Capital, Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Recruiting
- Lao Tropical and Public Health Institute
-
Contact:
- Dr Somphou Sayasane, PhD
- Phone Number: +856 20 55 679 60
- Email: somphou.sayasone@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All women 18 years of age and older and enrolled in Vientiane Multigenerational Birth Cohort (VITERBI) with at least one child less than two years old, able to read, have exclusive access to a mobile phone, have a WhatsApp account, understand and sign the ICF will be eligible to participate in the study. The eligibility criteria will be assessed using data collected from VITERBI. Ability to read will be tested using a script in Lao, "I use my mobile phone every day."
Exclusion Criteria:
- Eligible women unwilling to sign informed consent, without exclusive access to a mobile phone, unable to read the test script, or unable operate a mobile phone will be excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention group will receive biweekly updates about quality ratings of recently visited health care providers for children by everyone enrolled in the study.
|
Ratings of overall and components of quality (provider knowledge, respectfulness of provider, respectfulness of staff, cleanliness, cost) of health care providers for children will be provided on a webpage.
The webpage will be updated every week and participants will be invited to access the latest ratings biweekly.
|
No Intervention: Control
The control group will not receive any information about health care providers for children.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of mothers that change their preferred health care providers for children for non-urgent care
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of mothers that changed their preferred health care facility for non-urgent child care services between baseline and endline surveys.
Non-urgent care is defined as children with mild fever of 38 degrees along with cough.
During the baseline and endline surveys, participants will be asked to specify their preferred location for non-urgent child care as follows: "If your child is sick tomorrow with mild fever of 38 degrees Celsius and cough, which hospital, clinic or health center will you take your child to?"
The primary outcome will be a binary indicator for participants changing their preferred location between baseline and endline.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of mothers satisfied with health care for their children of their most recent visit
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The secondary outcome measure will be satisfaction with the health care facility visited most recently for care for their child under age 2. This measure will only be available for mothers seeking care for their child during the study period.
This will be a binary variable and satisfaction will be defined as answering "Excellent" or "Very good" (instead of "Good", "Fair", or "Poor") to the question, "How would you rate the overall quality of care you received?",
referring to the most recent visit for their child under age 2 within the past 3 months.
|
3 months
|
Number and type of health care providers used in the past 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
This secondary outcome is the number and types of providers (government health centers, government hospitals, private clinics and private hospitals) visited by mothers for health care for their children during the study period.
Every 2 weeks, all enrolled participants will be asked: "Did you visit a health center, hospital or clinic for child in the last two weeks?"
using a mobile application.
Ones that respond "Yes," will be requested to complete an online survey about the visit, which will ask them to specify the health facility visited.
|
3 months
|
Proportion of mothers that change their most recently visited health care providers for children
Time Frame: 3 months
|
This secondary outcome is the proportion of mothers that changed the most recently visited health care facility for child care services between baseline and endline surveys.
This measure will be a binary variable and will only be available for caregivers using care both within the three months periods preceding the baseline and endline survey.
|
3 months
|
Proportion of mothers confident they can identify the best place for getting care for sick children
Time Frame: 3 months
|
This secondary outcome is the proportion of mothers can identify the best place for getting care for sick children based on his/her health problems.
During the baseline and endline surveys, all participants will be asked to respond with "Strongly agree," "Agree," "Unsure," "Disagree" or "Strongly disagree" to the following question: "I am able to identify the best place to get care for my child when he/she is sick."
This outcome will be a binary variable.
Participants responding with "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" will be defined as being confident that they can identify the best place for getting care for sick children and participants responding with "Unsure," "Disagree," or "Strongly Disagree" will be defined as not being confident where to seek care.
|
3 months
|
Proportion of mothers choosing the preferred facility for non-urgent care because of online or digital information sources
Time Frame: 3 months
|
This secondary outcome is the proportion of mothers that used online or digital information sources reasons for choosing providers for non-urgent care.
During the baseline and endline surveys, participants will be asked to specify their preferred location for non-urgent child care as follows: "If your child is sick tomorrow with mild fever of 38 degrees Celsius and cough, which hospital, clinic or health center will you take your child to?"
After this question, participants will be asked, "Was this choice informed by online or digital information services?"
This outcome will be a binary variable.
|
3 months
|
Proportion of mothers that change their preferred health care providers for children for urgent care
Time Frame: 3 months
|
This secondary outcome is the proportion of mothers that changed their preferred health care facility for urgent child care services between baseline and endline surveys.
Urgent care is defined as children with high fever and a red rash covering their body.
During the baseline and endline surveys, participants will be asked to specify their preferred location for urgent child care as follows: "If your child is sick tomorrow with a very high fever of 39-40 degrees and a red rash covering their body, which hospital, clinic or health center will you take your child to?"
This outcome will be a binary indicator for participants changing their preferred location for urgent care between baseline and endline.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Günther Fink, PhD, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
- Principal Investigator: Amit Aryal, MPH, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- SwissTI
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Health Care
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe Commonwealth FundCompletedHealth Care Costs | Quality of Health CareUnited States
-
Laura RichardsonCompleted
-
University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles County Department of Public HealthCompleted
-
Universidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaInter-American Development BankCompletedQuality of Health Care
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe Commonwealth Fund; New York State Department of Health; Taconic Health Information... and other collaboratorsCompletedElectronic Health Records | Quality of Health CareUnited States
-
University of ChicagoYale UniversityCompletedCommunication | Patient Care | Quality of Health CareUnited States
-
Kaiser PermanentePatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteCompletedCommunication | Primary Health Care | Quality of Health Care | Comorbidity | Medical Informatics ApplicationsUnited States
-
Conestoga CollegeCompletedNursing Homes | Quality of Health Care
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalCompletedCommunication | Quality of Health Care | WorkflowTaiwan
-
Moroccan Society of SurgeryCompletedDecision Making | Quality of Health Care | Patient Care Team | Neoplasms/TherapyMorocco
Clinical Trials on Quality ratings of health care providers for children
-
King's College LondonNational Institute for Health Research, United KingdomRecruitingHealthy | Parents | Staff AttitudeUnited Kingdom
-
Temple UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityCompletedDepression | Insulin ResistanceUnited States
-
Tokyo UniversityJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentCompletedNoncommunicable Diseases | Continuum of CareJapan
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingRespiratory Distress | Upper Airway ObstructionFrance
-
Bahçeşehir UniversityKoç UniversityCompletedAsthma in ChildrenTurkey
-
University of New MexicoNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Terminated
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Not yet recruitingSubstance UseUnited States
-
University of CologneUniversity of SiegenNot yet recruitingStress, Psychological | Premature Birth | Father-Child Relations