- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06311331
Prospective Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Total Talus Replacement (PROCLAIM)
Prospective Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Total Talus Replacement (PROCLAIM): A Multicenter, Single Arm, Prospective, Post-approval Study for Patients Who Received the restor3d TTR Device to Evaluate Safety and Probable Benefit
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥22 Years of Age
- Scheduled to receive TTR implant for one of the following indications:
- Avascular necrosis of the talus
- Avascular necrosis of the talus in addition to talar collapse, cysts or non-union
- Large, uncontained, unstable, or cystic talar osteochondral defects with risk of collapse or talar osteochondral defects not responsive to traditional treatments
- Nonunion following talar fracture or talar extrusion, unresponsive to more conservative treatments
- Have not had a prior Total Talus Replacement device implanted
- Not planning to receive bilateral Total Talus Replacement devices
- Subject signs a written informed consent form (ICF) prior to the surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Surgical procedures other than those listed in the indications for use.
- Use of implant greater than 6 months from date of patient's preoperative CT scan.
- Degenerative changes in the tibiotalar, subtalar or talonavicular joints.
- Gross deformity in sagittal or coronal planes. More than 15 degrees of varus or valgus deformity in the coronal plane, or more than 50% subluxation anteriorly or posteriorly of the talus in the sagittal plane
- Patients with an active local or systemic infection.
- Osteonecrosis of the calcaneus, distal tibia or navicular.
- Known history of existing malignancy, or any systemic infection, local infection, or skin compromise at the surgical site.
- Blood supply limitations and previous infections that may prevent healing.
- Physical conditions that would eliminate adequate implant support or prevent healing, including inadequate soft tissue coverage.
- Conditions which may limit the patient's ability or willingness to restrict activities or follow directions postoperatively during the healing period.
- Presence of neurological deficit which would prevent patient postoperative compliance.
- Patients with foreign body sensitivity, suspected or documented material allergy or intolerance. Where material sensitivity is suspected, appropriate tests should be conducted, and sensitivity ruled out prior to implantation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Total Talus Replacement
50 subjects receiving the Total Talus Replacement device
|
The restor3d patient-specific TTR Implant and Instrumentation System is designed to replace a native talus bone that has been affected by a disease state or injury.
The implant is an additively manufactured Cobalt Chromium alloy (ASTM F3213) construct produced by laser powder bed fusion.
The data-driven design of the implant enables the patient to salvage their joint while maintaining ankle range of motion, reducing pain and improving physical function.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of participants who pass a composite of safety and probable benefit outcomes
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
The primary endpoint for this post approval study is a composite of safety and probable benefit. The safety endpoint is defined by the absence of device-related SAE and subsequent secondary surgical intervention (SSSI) on the affected joints. The probable benefit endpoint is defined as joint salvage with the restor3d device still in place. This composite endpoint will be evaluated by determining the proportion of patients who do not have a device-related SAE or SSSI, AND have the restor3d implant in place at 5 years. |
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in perceived pain from baseline
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Scores on the 11-point Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) rated from 0-10 where higher scores indicate worse pain
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Change in Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) Composite score from baseline
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a 42-item questionnaire with 5 subscales: pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), activities of daily living (ADL) (17 items), sports/recreation (5 items), and quality of life (4 items).
Each question is graded from 0 to 4 on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme problems).
Composite FAOS scores include all 42-items across the 5 subscales, scored together to provide one comprehensive value.
The FAOS composite score ranges from 0 to 100 where a score of 0 indicates the worst possible symptoms, and a score of 100 indicates no symptoms.
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Change in Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) pain subscale score from baseline
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) other symptoms subscale score from baseline
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) activities of daily living (ADL) subscale score from baseline
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) sports/recreation subscale score from baseline
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) quality of life (QOL) subscale score from baseline
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
|
Change in ankle range of motion (ROM) from baseline
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Ankle ROM will be evaluated using a goniometer to determine the change in degrees of plantarflexion and dorsiflexion
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Proportion of procedure-related Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Procedure-related Serious Adverse Event will be defined as the number of patients who have a procedure-related event including: death, life-threatening condition, hospital admission (initial or prolonged), disability or permanent damage, or required intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage.
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Proportion of Adverse Events
Time Frame: At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Adverse Event will be defined as the number of patients who have a non-serious, unexpected procedure- or device-related event before 5 years post-implantation.
|
At 5 years compared to baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- restor3d-007
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Avascular Necrosis of the Talus
-
Paragon 28Recruiting
-
Kyle Schweser MDRecruiting
-
Universidad Autonoma de MadridCompletedAvascular Necrosis of the Femoral HeadItaly, France, Germany, Spain
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandWithdrawnAvascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head
-
R-BioSMG-SNU Boramae Medical CenterCompletedAvascular Necrosis of the Femoral HeadKorea, Republic of
-
Peking University Third HospitalCompletedOsteochondral Lesions of the Talus
-
Zimmer BiometActive, not recruitingAvascular Necrosis of the Femoral HeadUnited States
-
Zimmer BiometRecruitingOsteoarthritis, Hip | Avascular Necrosis of Hip | Post-traumatic; Arthrosis | Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral HeadUnited States, Denmark, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden
-
Ministry of Health, KuwaitNot yet recruitingOsteochondral Lesions of the Talus
-
Stryker Trauma GmbHActive, not recruitingAvascular Necrosis | Traumatic Arthritis | Osteoarthritis of the ShoulderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Total Talus Replacement (TTR)
-
Restor3DCompletedTalus | Ankle ArthropathyUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted
-
Rothman Institute OrthopaedicsEnrolling by invitation
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruiting
-
Duke UniversityCompletedAnkle OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS TrustStryker NordicRecruitingPost-traumatic Osteoarthritis | Inflammatory Arthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Avascular Necrosis of Hip | Congenital Hip ProblemsUnited Kingdom
-
Virtua Health, Inc.RecruitingPrimary Osteoarthritis of Knee NosUnited States
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkOslo University Hospital; Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityCompleted
-
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ExeterRecruiting
-
CorinCompletedArthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom