Examining the Health Effects of NPOWER365 Among Black Same Gender Loving Men

June 8, 2026 updated by: Devin English, PhD, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
This research study aims to test the effectiveness, reach, and maintenance over time of the NPOWER365 HIV care intervention for Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) living with HIV. NPOWER365 is a BMSM community-developed multicomponent intervention that aims to: 1) Support daily health promotion via HIV health education and health maintenance reminders; 2) Foster positive social connections among BMSM via online moderated forums, interpersonal chats, and community calendars; 3) Connect clients to BMSM-affirming healthcare, including HIV treatment and mental healthcare; 4) Provide resources for housing, transportation, and other economic empowerment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This research study aims to test the effectiveness, reach, and maintenance over time of the NPOWER365 HIV care intervention for Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) living with HIV. NPOWER365 is a BMSM community-developed multicomponent intervention that aims to: 1) Support daily health promotion via HIV health education and health maintenance reminders; 2) Foster positive social connections among BMSM via online moderated forums, interpersonal chats, and community calendars; 3) Connect clients to BMSM-affirming healthcare, including HIV treatment and mental healthcare; 4) Provide resources for housing, transportation, and other economic empowerment.

Participants will be recruited in collaboration with NAESM INC, our community partner and the largest BMSM-led social service organization for BMSM in the Atlanta, GA metro area. We will recruit 8 participants per month. After completing an online screener to assess for basic eligibility requirements, participants will be scheduled for an online, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA)-compliant Zoom consent and baseline survey process. All online assessments will be completed using HIPAA-compliant Qualtrics surveys.

Participants will review study information and complete informed consent procedures with study staff, including agreeing to provide access to their NPOWER365 paradata (i.e., app engagement data) and HIV viral suppression results. Once consented, participants will complete a computerized timeline follow-back interview to assess HIV anti-retroviral treatment (ART) adherence and substance use, as well as measures of intersectional stigma, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, emotion regulation, social support coping, ART information and motivation, and multilevel barriers to ART adherence. They will also be guided through a practice daily diary. Finally, intervention group participants will be registered for the mHealth (e.g., online forums) and institutional (e.g., linkage to care) aspects of NPOWER365(see Research Strategy of the appended NIH R01 application for additional details on these procedures). Control group participants will remain on the registration waitlist until after the 6-month study is over. All participants will receive virtual gift card compensation directly following the baseline.

All participants will complete brief daily measures of intersectional stigma, ART adherence, substance use, depressive and anxiety symptoms, emotion regulation, and social support coping for 14 days after baseline to assess NPOWER365effectiveness. Upon completion of the 2-week cycle, participants will complete a 2-week follow-up online survey, including identical measures to those received at baseline. All participants will receive compensation for their participation in the 2-week assessment as well as compensation based on the number of daily surveys they completed.

There will then be online follow-up surveys at 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-months post baseline. These assessments will include identical measures to the baseline and 2-week assessments. As with the baseline, participants will receive virtual gift-card compensation directly after they complete their surveys. Following the 6-month assessment, all participants will participate in a second 2-week daily diary study. At the end of the 2-week process, participants will engage in a debriefing session and have the opportunity to provide feedback on the NPOWER365intervention and the research process. As with the initial daily diary period, participants will receive virtual gift-card compensation based on the number of surveys they completed.

The primary analytic aims of the study will be to: 1) Test the effectiveness of NPOWER365 in improving daily and longer-term (1-6 month) ART adherence; 2) Test the effectiveness of NPOWER365 in improving daily and longer-term (1-6 month) secondary outcomes (i.e., substance use, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, emotion regulation, social support coping, ART information and motivation, and multilevel barriers to ART adherence) and exploratory outcome (viral load); 3) Examine the moderating effect of NPOWER365 on associations between intersectional stigma and primary and secondary HIV-related behavioral and psychological health outcomes; 4) Evaluate user-level and setting-level maintenance and reach data including how the effects of, and engagement with, NPOWER365are sustained across the 6-month period within individual participants, how the effects of NPOWER365 are sustained across the 50-month period for participants who participate at different times, how engagement with NPOWER365 is sustained 1-year post-study (as observed via paradata), how is the intervention adapted over the 50-month study period, and what are the characteristics of the individuals who participate and use NPOWER365.

We will estimate all analytic models in Mplus and SPSS. We will test the effectiveness of NPOWER365 on daily primary and secondary HIV outcomes by examining a series of two-level dynamic structural equation models (DSEMs) that test differences in within-participant changes in our outcomes across intervention groups. We will test the effectiveness of NPOWER365 on longer-term primary and secondary HIV outcomes through between- and within-group analyses estimated as latent growth curve models that test changes in the outcomes across intervention groups during the 6-month study period. We will examine the main effects of intersectional stigma on primary and secondary HIV outcomes using DSEM in autoregressive models (VAR (1)). We will build off these VAR (1) models to examine the moderating effects of NPOWER365 on the intersectional stigma HIV outcomes associations using multiple group moderation analyses. If we find significant intervention group differences we will examine the associations between specific mHealth components (e.g., mHealth forums) and theoretically relevant mediators (e.g., social support coping) and outcomes (e.g., depressive symptoms). We will run all descriptive analyses for reach and maintenance in SPSS. Effects maintenance analyses with build off the DSEM and VAR (1) models to observe time as a predictor of within-participants and across-participants changes in NPOWER365 effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Identify as Black or African American, regardless of ethnicity
  2. Identify as male, regardless of sex assigned at birth
  3. Are living with HIV and prescribed a daily ART regimen
  4. Are age ≥ 18;
  5. Have sex with men
  6. Own an internet-connected device (e.g., smartphone, tablet)
  7. Reside in the Atlanta-area EHE jurisdictions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lack of English fluency
  2. Past participation in the pilot.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Arm
NPOWER365 is a multicomponent intervention that combines mHealth features and institutional to support community priorities identified in formative CBPR. In line with best practices for trials of intervention principles (TIPs) with mHealth interventions, NPOWER365 deploys intervention elements that serve to accomplish intervention strategies. NPOWER365 intervention strategies are to promote: 1)Health knowledge and motivation; 2)Social support coping; 3)Access to culturally-affirming healthcare; and 4)Housing and other economic resources. NPOWER365 pursues these strategies via these intervention elements: 1)Weekly HIV and psychological health information and motivation content and daily health notifications; 2)Online moderated forums, interpersonal chats, and community calendars; 3)Linkage to biopsychosocial healthcare via NAESM's network of Black SGLM-affirming providers; and 4)Housing and economic resources through NAESM's direct support and referral network.
NPOWER365 is a multicomponent intervention that combines mHealth features and institutional to support community priorities identified in formative CBPR. In line with best-practices for trials of intervention principles (TIPs) with mHealth interventions, NPOWER365 deploys intervention elements that serve to accomplish intervention strategies. NPOWER365 intervention strategies are to promote: 1)Health knowledge and motivation; 2)Social support coping; 3)Access to culturally-affirming healthcare; and 4)Housing and other economic resources. NPOWER365 pursues these strategies via these intervention elements: 1)Weekly HIV and psychological health information and motivation content and daily health notifications; 2)Online moderated forums, interpersonal chats, and community calendars; 3)Linkage to biopsychosocial healthcare via NAESM's network of Black SGLM-affirming providers; and 4)Housing and economic resources through NAESM's direct support and referral network.
No Intervention: Control Arm
The 6-month waitlist control group will have access only to NAESM services not covered by NPOWER365, such as in-person events. The investigators will ensure the control group does not access the NPOWER365 mHealth app portion by screening all new app users, giving the intervention group unique private log-ins, and explaining the importance of securing those log-ins to ensure the accuracy of study results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antiretroviral (ART) Medication Use
Time Frame: 24 hours
For daily surveys, participants will report ART adherence on a single binary item ("In the past 24 hours did the participant take ART medication?")
24 hours
ART adherence-Long Lag Assessments
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The investigators will use the NAME scale that assesses barriers to ART adherence.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Substance Use-Long Lag Assessments
Time Frame: 2 weeks
For long lags (i.e., 2 week assessment to 6 month assessment), participants will complete an online, automated retrospective assessment of substance use in the past 2 weeks.
2 weeks
COPE
Time Frame: 24 hours
A modified version of the Brief-COPE assesses coping approaches to stress over the last 24 hour. It includes the 6 items from the interconnectedness and problem-oriented subscales, and 3 original items assessing specific interconnectedness with Black LGBTQ people and problem-oriented action against injustice.
24 hours
Daily Diary Substance Use
Time Frame: 24 hours
The investigators will measure daily substance use with single-item binary measures of various substances (e.g.,alcohol, marijuana).
24 hours
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: 24 hours
The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 assesses anxiety and depressive symptoms. Participants rate the extent to which the participants had been experiencing each item the past day (e.g., "In the past 24 hours, I've been feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge") on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (entirely). The investigators used an average across all items for each time point.
24 hours
Depressive Symptoms-Long Lag
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Brief Symptom Inventory assesses anxiety and depressive symptoms. Participants rate the extent to which the participants had been experiencing each item the past two weeks (e.g., "Feeling hopeless about the future") on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (Extremely). The investigators will use an average across all items for each time point.
2 weeks
Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: 24 hours
The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 assesses anxiety and depressive symptoms. Participants rate the extent to which the participants had been experiencing each item the past day (e.g., "In the past 24 hours, I've been feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge") on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (completely). We used an average across all items for each time point.
24 hours
Anxiety Symptoms-Long Lag
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Brief Symptom Inventory assesses anxiety and depressive symptoms. Participants rate the extent to which the participants had been experiencing each item the past 2 weeks (e.g., "Feeling tense or keyed up") on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (Extremely). The investigators will use an average across all items for each time point.
2 weeks
Emotion Regulation Emotion Regulation
Time Frame: 24 hours
A validated four-item version of the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale assesses emotion regulation. Participants rated the extent to which the participants had been experiencing each item (e.g., "In the past 24 hours, I've been experiencing my emotions as overwhelming") in the past day on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (entirely). The investigators used an average across all items for each time point.
24 hours
Emotion Regulation-Long Lag Assessments
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The investigators will use the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale- Short Form (DERS-SF) for long lags
2 weeks
COPE-Long Lag Assessments
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The investigators will use the Brief-COPE measure to assess past 2-week coping, which assesses the following coping approaches in 28 items: Self-distraction, active coping, denial, substance use, use of emotional social support, use of instrumental social support, Behavioral disengagement, venting, positive reframing, planning, humor, acceptance, religion, and self-blame.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Devin English, Ph.D., Rutgers University
  • Principal Investigator: Justin Smith, MS, MPH, Positive Impact Health Centers

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Outside researchers will be able to request access to these de-identified data through email to the PI in order to conduct analyses for which the PI and study team do not have expertise. This request will be considered by the PI, the appropriate officers at Rutgers University for processing. As such, the PI will initiate a DTA, and seek the legal advice of Rutgers University regarding the adequacy of compliance with any relevant laws, policies, or regulations. If approved, data will be completely de-identified and shared through a secure sharing mechanism (e.g., password protected and encrypted online database for electronic data). No participant codes will be shared with external researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will only be shared with other researchers who have received IRB approval and who will destroy or return dataset information after completing their analyses.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will only be shared with other researchers who have received IRB approval and who will destroy or return dataset information after completing their analyses.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medication Adherence

Clinical Trials on NPOWER365 HIV care intervention

Subscribe