Diagnostic Value of Endocytoscopy for Colorectal Lesions

April 29, 2024 updated by: Hong Xu

Diagnostic Value of Two Different Mode Endocytoscopy for Colorectal Lesions

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Colonoscopy is considered the preferred method of screening for colorectal cancer, and resection of colorectal lesions can significantly reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. In order to improve the qualitative and quantitative diagnosis of colorectal lesions, many endoscopic techniques, such as image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE), including narrowband imaging (NBI), magnifying endoscopy, pigment endoscopy, confocal laser endoscopy, and endocytoscopy (EC) are applied clinically. The application of EC is intended to achieve the purpose of real-time histopathological endoscopic diagnosis without biopsy. Several studies have shown that EC is effective in identifying the nature of colorectal lesions and judging the depth of invasion in CRC. Based on the endoscopic diagnosis, the endoscopist can determine the treatment plan for the colorectal lesions. The latest EC is an integrated endoscope with a contact light microscopy system with a maximum magnification of 520 x. EC may demonstrate the atypical of gland structure and cells after staining (EC staining mode, along with the use of the EC-NBI mode. The endoscopic diagnosis of the EC staining mode is based on the EC classification (EC-C), used to predict the histopathological diagnosis of colorectal lesions. A prospective randomized trial showed that the diagnostic accuracy was 94.1% by EC-C. However, the diagnostic value of EC-C depends on the operator and may be influenced by the quality of the staining. Meanwhile, the high-quality staining process is time-consuming and tedious. Therefore, EC-NBI seems to be the first choice for EC diagnosis with the advantages of convenient operation and efficient diagnosis. EC-NBI can display the super-amplified surface microvessels of the lesion and provide pathological prediction according to the vessel classification (EC-V). EC-V achieved 99% diagnostic accuracy for hyperplastic polyps and 88.6% for invasive carcinoma. In EC examination, the investigators usually use EC-NBI and EC staining successively to diagnose colorectal lesions, which is believed to improve the diagnostic performance. However, the diagnostic value of increasing EC-staining after EC-NBI examination for predicting the pathological nature of colorectal lesions is still unclear. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of two different modalities of cell endoscopy for colorectal lesions and to clarify whether additional EC staining after EC-NBI could improve the diagnostic performance of predicting the pathological diagnosis of colorectal lesions.

In the study, the investigators collect clinical information of colorectal lesions which were diagnosed by endoscopic diagnosis (including EC-NBI and EC-staining) and pathological diagnosis. Then, the investigators calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and high confidence diagnosis rate of EC-C and EC-V classification, respectively. Inter-and intra-observer agreement in the diagnosis of EC-C and EC-V will be calculated.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, China, 130021
        • Recruiting
        • the Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hong Xu, Doctor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mingqing Liu, Doctor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nan Zhang, Doctor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The investigators analyzed only endoscopically or surgically resected colorectal lesions (hyperplastic polyps, adenomas and invasive cancers) that had been observed with EC-NBI and EC-stained by endoscopists before treatment that were ultimately performed histopathologic examination.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • colorectal lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-epithelial tumors
  • sessile serrated lesions
  • inflammatory polyps
  • juvenile polyps
  • hamartomatous polyps
  • a history of inflammatory bowel disease
  • chemotherapy or radiation therapy for colorectal cancer
  • lesions without clear EC images.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
colorectal lesion
The colorectal lesions had been observed with EC-NBI and EC-stained by endoscopists before treatment that were ultimately performed histopathologic examination. The endocytoscopies (CF-H290ECI, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) have a maximum magnification of ×520, focusing depth, 35 μm; field of view, 570 × 500μm. During EC-NBI , the endoscopist pushed the button of the endoscope to switch from white-light imaging to NBI and observed the lesion with full magnification. Finally, the endoscopist performed EC-stained mode diagnosis after staining the lesion surface with 1.0% methylene blue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
sensitivity
Time Frame: April 2024
April 2024
specificity
Time Frame: April 2024
April 2024
accuracy
Time Frame: April 2024
April 2024
positive predictive value
Time Frame: April 2024
April 2024
negative predictive value
Time Frame: April 2024
April 2024

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
inter-observer agreement
Time Frame: April 2024
April 2024
intra-observer agreement
Time Frame: April 2024
April 2024

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on endocytoscopy

3
Subscribe