Self-administered tDCS for Improving Single- and Dual-task Gait in Patients With PD

March 23, 2024 updated by: Han Gil Seo, Seoul National University Hospital

Self-administered Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Improving Single- and Dual-task Gait in Patients With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective, Single-center, Double-blind, Exploratory, Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation to improve the single- and dual-task gait in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a disease caused by dopamine deficiency in the striatum resulting from the loss of dopaminergic neuronal cells in the cerebral substantia. It is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor symptoms including gait disturbance and balance instability. In the early stages of Parkinson's disease, dysfunction of the sensorimotor area of the basal ganglia typically occurs, leading to habitual control hurdles. Accordingly, cognitive efforts are required to perform habitual tasks such as walking, and the automaticity of walking is reduced. Dual-task performance involves a complex interplay of motor functions as well as cognitive functions such as attention and executive function. One way to potentially reduce the cost of dual-tasking and the negative effects of motor-cognitive interference is to consider improving the corresponding component, i.e., motor or cognitive function.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that can be used to change cortical activity. Recently, there has been growing attention on tDCS as an adjunct tool for rehabilitation. Several tDCS studies in patients with PD have reported the positive results of tDCS on motor and cognitive function. Most studies have examined changes before and after a single session of stimulation, with limited research verifying the cumulative and long-term effects of tDCS. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation to improve the single- and dual-task gait in patients with PD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically diagnosed as idiopathic Parkinson's disease by neurologists according to the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria
  • modified Hoehn & Yahr stage 2, 2.5, or 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of seizure
  • Metallic implants, such as cardiac pacemaker or an artificial cochlea
  • Patients with inflammation, burns, or wounds in the stimulation area
  • Parkinson's disease dementia; cut-off is < 7 of Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment for illiterate patients, < 13 for those educated for 0.5-3 years, < 16 for 4-6 years of education, < 19 for 7-9 years of education, and < 20 for 10 or more years of education.
  • Severe dyskinesia or severe on-off phenomenon
  • Plan to adjust medication at the time of screening
  • Other neurological, orthopedic, or cardiovascular co-morbidities significantly affecting gait function
  • Uncontrolled vestibular disease, orthopedic hypotension, or paroxysmal vertigo
  • Pregnant or lactating patients
  • Other comorbidities that make it difficult to participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Primary motor cortex
The anodal electrode is positioned in the primary motor cortex (Cz) and the cathodal electrode on the right orbital frontal cortex (Fp2). The current increases to 2.0 mA over a period of 30 seconds, maintains 2.0 mA for 19 minutes, and decreases to 0 mA over 30 seconds.
tDCS self-administered at home once a day for 28 consecutive days for a total of 28 sessions (one session consists of 20 minutes through two saline-soaked sponge electrodes (diameter 6cm) using the YMS-201B (Ybrain Inc, South Korea)).
Experimental: Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
The anodal electrode is positioned in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) and the cathodal electrode on the right orbital frontal cortex (Fp2). The current increases to 2.0 mA over a period of 30 seconds, maintains 2.0 mA for 19 minutes, and decreases to 0 mA over 30 seconds.
tDCS self-administered at home once a day for 28 consecutive days for a total of 28 sessions (one session consists of 20 minutes through two saline-soaked sponge electrodes (diameter 6cm) using the YMS-201B (Ybrain Inc, South Korea)).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Timed-up and go test (sec)
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
Immediate post-intervention
Timed-up and go test under dual-task condition (sec)
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
Immediate post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dual-task effect (%) in Timed-up and go test
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
Percentage of dual-task effect calculated by the difference between dual-task and single-task performance [Percentage of dual-task interference=(Dual-task performance - Single-task performance)/Single-task performance]
Immediate post-intervention
modified Attention Allocation Index (mAAI) in Timed-up and go test
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
modified Attention Allocation Index (mAAI)=motor dual task effect(mDTE)-cognitive dual task effect (cogDTE)
Immediate post-intervention
Single-leg stance test
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
Immediate post-intervention
Timed-up and go test (sec)
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
Follow-up (1 month)
Timed-up and go test under dual-task condition (sec)
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
Follow-up (1 month)
Dual-task effect (%) in Timed-up and go test
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
Percentage of dual-task effect calculated by the difference between dual-task and single-task performance [Percentage of dual-task interference=(Dual-task performance - Single-task performance)/Single-task performance]
Follow-up (1 month)
modified Attention Allocation Index (mAAI) in Timed-up and go test
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
modified Attention Allocation Index (mAAI)=motor dual task effect(mDTE)-cognitive dual task effect (cogDTE)
Follow-up (1 month)
Single-leg stance test
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
Follow-up (1 month)
Gait parameters
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
Symmetric temporospatial parameters, Normal cadence, Decreased & intolerable walking velocity, Normal step length differential, Normal step length on both sides, Normal stride length on both sides, Normal swing phase & stance phase on both sides, Normal single support time & double support time on both sides, Slightly widened base of support on both sides, Increased foot angle on right side
Immediate post-intervention
Stroop test
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
The Stroop test evaluates attention, executive function, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility regarding an individual's ability to inhibit the habitual response.
Immediate post-intervention
Trail making test
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
The trail-making test is a neuropsychological measure that assesses psychomotor speed, attention, sequencing, mental flexibility, and visual scanning.
Immediate post-intervention
New freezing of gait questionnaire (NFoGQ)
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
NFoGQ consists of 6 items. Total score ranges from 0 to 24. the higher scores, the more negative results.
Immediate post-intervention
Geriatric depression scale (GDS)-short form
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
The GDS Short Form contains 15 items. The higher the score, the more negative the result.
Immediate post-intervention
Gait parameters
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
Symmetric temporospatial parameters, Normal cadence, Decreased & intolerable walking velocity, Normal step length differential, Normal step length on both sides, Normal stride length on both sides, Normal swing phase & stance phase on both sides, Normal single support time & double support time on both sides, Slightly widened base of support on both sides, Increased foot angle on right side
Follow-up (1 month)
Stroop test
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
The Stroop test evaluates attention, executive function, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility regarding an individual's ability to inhibit the habitual response.
Follow-up (1 month)
Trail making test
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
The trail-making test is a neuropsychological measure that assesses psychomotor speed, attention, sequencing, mental flexibility, and visual scanning.
Follow-up (1 month)
New freezing of gait questionnaire (NFoGQ)
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
NFoGQ consists of 6 items. Total score ranges from 0 to 24. the higher scores, the more negative results.
Follow-up (1 month)
Geriatric depression scale (GDS)-short form
Time Frame: Follow-up (1 month)
The GDS Short Form contains 15 items. The higher the score, the more negative the result.
Follow-up (1 month)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Transcranial direct current stimulation

3
Subscribe