Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Against Chronic Diarrhea in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis (FaeMiCue)

March 20, 2024 updated by: Klaus Krogh, University of Aarhus

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Against Chronic Diarrhea in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis - a Randomized, Double-blinded, Safety and Pilot-efficacy Study

This clinical trial aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in improving chronic diarrhea symptoms among patients with systemic sclerosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study aims to assess the feasibility, pilot efficacy, and safety of FMT for patients with Systemic Sclerosis.

Participants will undergo two interventions in this present study.

In the first intervention, participants are randomized 1:1 for either active FMT or Placebo. This first intervention consists of two doses of FMT with a 3-7 day gap.

In the second intervention, all participants receive 1 dose of active FMT treatment.

This study design allows researchers to evaluate the safety of FMT in this patient group, and compare the effects of FMT in the FMT-treated group vs the placebo group, to see if FMT promotes remission of Chronic diarrhea. Furthermore, researchers will be able to gain insights into whether 2 initial doses are superior to one.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Klaus Krogh, MD, DMSc
  • Phone Number: 23385937
  • Email: klaukrog@rm.dk

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants > 18 years
  • Fulfilling and previously diagnosed with SSc according to the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatisms SSs classification criteria[23] by rheumatologist or dermatologist.
  • Chronic diarrea is defined as loose or watery stools, three or more times a day, a minimum of 50% of the days within the last four weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand Danish spoken or written and/or Trial procedures.
  • Known or anticipated pregnancy (excluded by male sex, postmenopausal women, or otherwise negative U-HCG)
  • Previous treatment with FMT
  • Treatment with antibiotics within the past 6 weeks
  • Changes in morphine treatment within the past 4 weeks
  • Ongoing infection with Clostridioides difficile (negative PCR test)
  • Known serious gastrointestinal disease or GI infection (diagnosed with e.g. inflammatory bowel disease and/or gastrointestinal cancer)
  • Dysregulated thyroid disease (TSH) blood sample from previous consultations maximum 6 months old from
  • Known intestinal stricture
  • Planned MR scan within the study period
  • Pacemaker/ICD
  • Previous abdominal surgery (minor surgical procedures ex. appendectomy is allowed)
  • Changes in medicine that affect the GI tract within the past four weeks.
  • Known Severe end-organ disease

    • Lung disease with forced vital capacity(FVC)<50% and/or diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <40%
    • Severe heart failure with ejection fraction <30%
    • End-stage kidney disease with glomeration rate<30ml/min

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active treatment
Active capsule FMT-treatment
Treatment is given as capsules.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo capsules are given.
Treatment is given as capsules.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of adverse events (AE) severity grade 2 or more assessed by CTCAE v5.0. during the first week after intervention (FMT or placebo).
Time Frame: The first week after treatment.
Patient-reported measures from the schedule of side effects and telephone call 1 week after each intervention.
The first week after treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported treatment outcome on symptoms
Time Frame: The first week after treatment.
Based on self-reported data from the bowel habit diary.
The first week after treatment.
Patient-reported measures from the schedule of side effects and telephone call 1 week after each intervention.
Time Frame: One week after each treatment

Mild adverse events (grade 1) following FMT or placebo assessed by (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0) CTCAE v5.0.

The CTCAE grades adverse events (AEs) based on severity:

Grade 1: Mild, asymptomatic, or mild symptoms; no intervention needed. Grade 2: Moderate; requires minimal intervention; affects age-appropriate activities.

Grade 3: Severe or medically significant, not immediately life-threatening; may require hospitalization.

Grade 4: Life-threatening; urgent intervention needed. Grade 5: AE-related death. Note: Some AEs may not have all five grades available.

One week after each treatment
Patient-reported outcomes from questionnaires.
Time Frame: At Baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Change in Gastrointestinal syndrome rating scale - irritable bowel version questionnaire (GSRS-IBS)
At Baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Patient-reported outcomes from questionnaires.
Time Frame: At Baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Change in Wexner incontinence score.
At Baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Patient-reported outcomes from questionnaires.
Time Frame: At Baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Change in UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract (UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0)
At Baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Patient-reported overall symptom burden
Time Frame: Each week for a total of 26 weeks.
The patients self-reported the severity of symptoms and their impact on daily life each week on a scale from 1-5. 1 being little to no burden, 5 being most severe.
Each week for a total of 26 weeks.
Objective measures from the wireless motility capsule.
Time Frame: At baseline
Transit time through the small intestine.
At baseline
Objective measures from the wireless motility capsule.
Time Frame: At baseline
Colonic transit times
At baseline
Objective measures from the wireless motility capsule.
Time Frame: At baseline
Total gastrointestinal transittimes
At baseline
Objective measures from the wireless motility capsule.
Time Frame: At baseline
Ph drop from the small intestine to the colon
At baseline
Objective measures from the low-dose CT scan.
Time Frame: At baseline and 4 weeks after first intervention

Volume of the a) small intestine and b) the colon. Volume of gas in a) the small intestine and b) the colon.

Changes in the gas volume in the small intestine and colon.

At baseline and 4 weeks after first intervention
Breath Test
Time Frame: At baseline and 4 weeks after first intervention
Changes in the rise of hydrogen and methane measured in breath test
At baseline and 4 weeks after first intervention
Faecal microbiota composition
Time Frame: At baseline and between each treatment, up to 4 weeks after last intervention
Changes in faecal microbiome composition. Alfa and beta diversity determined by sequencing of the intestinal microbiome.
At baseline and between each treatment, up to 4 weeks after last intervention
Faecal-calprotectin
Time Frame: At Baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Percentual change in faecal-calprotectin from before intervention to 4 weeks after each intervention.
At Baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Blood plasma proteomics
Time Frame: At baseline and between each treatment, up to four weeks after last intervention.
Changes in blood immunological parameters (including proteins) from baseline and between each treatment, at 4 weeks after intervention.
At baseline and between each treatment, up to four weeks after last intervention.
Blood plasma Fibrosis markers
Time Frame: At baseline and between each treatment, up to four weeks after last intervention.
Changes in blood immunological parameters (including markers of fibrosis) from baseline and between each treatment, at 4 weeks after intervention.
At baseline and between each treatment, up to four weeks after last intervention.
Blood parameters
Time Frame: At baseline and between each treatment, up to four weeks after last intervention.
Changes in blood immunological parameters (including circulating cytokines) from baseline and between each treatment, at 4 weeks after intervention.
At baseline and between each treatment, up to four weeks after last intervention.
Health-related Quality of life
Time Frame: At baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2

Changes in Health-related Quality of life assessed with (EQ-5D-5L). Each of the five dimensions comprising the EQ-5D descriptive system is divided into five levels of perceived problems: LEVEL 1: indicating no problem LEVEL 2: indicating slight problems LEVEL 3: indicating moderate problems LEVEL 4: indicating severe problems LEVEL 5: indicating unable to/Extreme problems

An EQ-VAS from 0-100 is added, 100 being the best possible health.

At baseline and 4 weeks after Intervention 1 & 2
Patient perception of FMT treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: At 4 weeks after interventions 1 & 2
Patient perception of FMT treatment satisfaction was assessed by 7-point Likert scale for patients. 1: no benefits from treatment to 7 being very satisfied with treatment.
At 4 weeks after interventions 1 & 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diarrhea

Clinical Trials on Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT)

3
Subscribe