Optimizing the Management of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia (OPTIMUS-SAB)

April 18, 2024 updated by: University of Alberta

Optimizing the Management of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia (OPTIMUS-SAB): A Stepped Wedge Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Centralized S. Aureus Management Model

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates with an incidence disproportionately higher in vulnerable populations. Management according to evidence-based care parameters, in particular Infectious Diseases (ID) consultation, is associated with improved mortality. SAB management is suboptimal in Alberta compared to other jurisdictions. An Alberta-based pilot study confirmed that timely recommendations to optimize SAB care, including ID consultation, was associated with improved adherence to all evidence-based quality-of-care indicators.

Leveraging this pilot work, the investigators aim to implement OPTIMUS-SAB, an enhanced model of the pilot, to optimize and standardize SAB management across Alberta. The implementation study will be a zone-based acute care site stepped wedge design. OPTIMUS-SAB will consist of a centralized SAB care team whom will receive automated notification of all blood cultures positive for S. aureus allowing them to review the patient's medical chart and make preliminary management recommendations according to an evidence-based care bundle.

The investigators will evaluate adherence to evidence-based SAB quality-of-care indicators before and after OPTIMUS-SAB implementation and expect this to improve with a resultant reduction in duration of bacteremia, length of stay, readmission rates, and mortality. In turn, this will translate into cost savings for the health care system.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than 18 years at the time of hospital admission
  • Confirmed S. aureus bacteremia by blood culture performed at a laboratory in Alberta, Canada
  • Admitted to a designated acute care site in Alberta, Canada

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The treating team believes death is imminent or inevitable .
  • GCD are C-level within 48 hours of admission.
  • The patient is transferred in from an out-of-province acute care center with a pre-existing SAB diagnosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of care
Experimental: OPTIMUS-SAB care pathway
Province-wide real time automated notifications of new SAB cases will be established and delivered to a centralized SAB care team electronically through Connect Care. The centralized SAB care team consists of a SAB clinical coordinator, ID specialists and other ad hoc representation depending on patient needs. Following patient chart review, the centralized SAB care team contacts the most responsible physician (MRP) to provide preliminary recommendations to optimize care, both verbally and in written format, facilitated by Connect Care (Alberta Health Services electronic medical record).
Activation of SAB clinical care pathway within EMR system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to quality-of-care indicators
Time Frame: Within 90 days

Defined as:

  1. ID involvement and time to ID involvement, defined by the presence of an ID consult note and/or recommendations in the chart.
  2. Repeat blood cultures, to document clearance of bacteremia, within 72 hours from the last positive blood culture.
  3. Guideline-concordant empiric antibiotic administered and time to receipt.
  4. Guideline concordant definitive antibiotic administered and time to receipt.
  5. Therapeutic drug monitoring of patents treatments with vancomycin.
  6. Appropriate dose adjustment of antimicrobials based on renal function according to local guidelines.
  7. Echocardiogram (transthoracic or transesophageal) performed within 72 hours of diagnosis.
  8. Source control achieved.
  9. Appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy ordered and delivered.
Within 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay
Time Frame: 180 days maximum
Acute hospital length of stay
180 days maximum
Hospital re-admission rates
Time Frame: 90 days
re-admission to acute care rate
90 days
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 180 days
death from any cause
180 days
In hospital mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
death within hospital stay
90 days
Costing evaluation
Time Frame: One year
Cost of SAB treatment related to hospitalization, including physician provision of care, and antibiotics.
One year
Implementation evaluation
Time Frame: 3 years
User experience and feedback from patients and providers will be collected at the start and end of each active implementation phase. This information will be paired with assessments of barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalization Process Theory during the pre-implementation phase and at the end of active implementation.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Justin Chen, MD, University of Alberta

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Staph Aureus Bacteremia

Clinical Trials on OPTIMUS-SAB clinical care pathway

3
Subscribe