- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06355115
Prophylactic Antibiotics Duration Towards Healing and Risk of Infection in Permanent Pacemaker (PPM) Installation (PACE-PRO)
Comparison Effect Between a Single Dose Prophylaxis Antibiotics Given One Day and Three Days Towards Healing and Risk of Infection in Permanent Pacemaker (PPM) Installation: a Preliminary Study
The insertion of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) is frequently a life-saving procedure. However, the implantation process could sometimes lead to a rare but serious infection. Therefore, administering prophylactic antibiotics to prevent infections before they occur, is a useful strategy to lower the risk of such infections.
Nonetheless, the optimal duration of prophylactic antibiotics for PPM remains uncertain. Individual study results are ambiguous and debatable due to the fact that each center has its own policy governing the regimen for prophylactic antibiotic use. Accordingly, the goal of this clinical trial is to assess and compare the effectiveness of two types of widely used prophylactic antibiotic durations in relation to the risk of infections following PPM implantations.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What is the efficacy of different durations of prophylactic antibiotics (single dosage vs 3-day dosage) in preventing infective complications following PPM implantations?
- What factors may influence the optimum use of prophylactic antibiotics for individual patients undergoing PPM implantation to minimize the risk of infective complications?
Researchers will compare a single dosage vs a 3-day dosage of prophylactic antibiotics following the PPM implantation procedure to see the risk of device-related infections.
Participants will:
- Be given a single-dose or 3-days dose of antibiotic regarding the PPM installations.
- Visit the clinic for follow-ups and tests.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The insertion of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) is a critical intervention often performed to manage various cardiac rhythm disorders, thereby enhancing patient survival and quality of life. However, the procedure carries a risk of introducing infections, which, although infrequent, can lead to severe complications. Prophylactic administration of antibiotics has been recognized as an effective measure to mitigate this risk by preventing the onset of infections prior to their occurrence.
Despite the widespread acceptance of this practice, the optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for PPM implantation remains a subject of debate. Variability in clinical protocols across different healthcare centers further complicates the establishment of a standardized approach. This clinical trial is designed to address this gap by evaluating and comparing the efficacy of two commonly employed prophylactic antibiotic regimens - a single dose versus a three-day course - in reducing the incidence of infectious complications following PPM implantations.
The study aims to address the following research questions:
- What is the comparative effectiveness of a single dose versus a three-day course of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing infectious complications after PPM implantation?
- What patient-specific or procedural factors might influence the optimal choice and duration of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in the context of PPM implantation?
To achieve these objectives, the trial will enroll patients scheduled for PPM implantation and randomly assign them to receive either a single dose or a three-day course of antibiotics. The choice of antibiotic will be based on our institutional guidelines, i.e. 1 gram of intravenous Cefazolin (first-generation cephalosporins), and by considering the patient's allergy history. The primary outcome will be the occurrence of device-related infections within a specified follow-up period, assessed through clinical examinations, laboratory tests, and imaging studies.
Participants will be required to attend follow-up visits at designated intervals post-implantation for assessment of any signs of infection, wound healing, and device function. Adherence to the antibiotic regimen and any adverse reactions will also be monitored.
By systematically comparing the outcomes of the two antibiotic regimens, this study aims to provide evidence-based guidance for the optimization of prophylactic antibiotic use in PPM implantations, thereby enhancing patient safety and treatment efficacy.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Icmi D Rochmawati, M.D.
- Phone Number: +62 857-6822-8899
- Email: icmidianr@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Jawa Timur
-
Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia, 65112
- Recruiting
- RSUD Dr. Saiful Anwar
-
Contact:
- RSUD Dr. Saiful Anwar
- Phone Number: 0341-362101
- Email: staf-rsu-drsaifulanwar@jatimprov.go.id
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Case inclusion criteria
- Adult patients, aged 18 to 100 years old, with indications for PPM (single or double chamber) installation.
- The patient is scheduled to undergo PPM installation for the first time
- The patient is willing to undergo routine follow-ups and visits
- Patients who are medically stable and do not have any acute illnesses that could interfere with the study outcomes.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with fever before the Procedure
- Skin disease
- Patients on anticoagulants or receiving bridging heparin
- Patients who used antibiotics 30 days before the PPM installation was carried out
- Patients with end stage renal failure
- Patients with uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus
- Patients with a history of infective endocarditis
- Patients with a history of moderate to severe valvular heart disease
- Patients with congenital heart disease
- Patients with non-cardiac comorbid diseases whose life expectancy is < 1 year
- Illness or physical disorder that causes the patient to be unable or limited to carry out physical activities
- Patients with a history of autoimmune disease, and confirmed autoimmune disease
- Patients on long-term steroid use
- The patient refused follow-up
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Three days dose prophylaxis
Intravenous (iv) injection of Cefazolin 1 gram 1-hour pre-procedure followed by iv injection of Cefazolin 1 gram every 12 hours for 3 days post-procedure (6 doses)
|
Cefazolin 1000 mg given intravenously
|
Experimental: Single dose prophylaxis
Intravenous injection of Cefazolin 1 gram 1-hour pre-procedure
|
Cefazolin 1000 mg given intravenously
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of participants with early pocket infection (EPI)
Time Frame: 0-30 days
|
EPI refers to a post-operative complication characterized by wound infection or infection of the device pouch within the initial weeks or month following surgical procedure.
Manifestations of early pocket infections include local signs of inflammation such as erythema, edema, warmth, and tenderness at the implantation site, occasionally accompanied by purulent discharge or systemic symptoms such as fever.
|
0-30 days
|
Number of participants with late pocket infection (LPI)
Time Frame: 1-3 months
|
LPI refers to a post-operative complication characterized by wound infection or infection of the device pouch within the following months following surgical procedure.
Manifestations of late pocket infections are similar to those of EPI, which include local signs of inflammation such as erythema, edema, warmth, and tenderness at the implantation site, occasionally accompanied by purulent discharge or systemic symptoms such as fever.
|
1-3 months
|
Number of participants with infective endocarditis (IE)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
IE following the implantation of PPM is characterized by bacteremia due to device infection, lead vegetation, right infective endocarditis.
Diagnosis is established through history taking and physical examination and the visualization of vegetations by Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE).
|
1 year
|
Number of participants who underwent pacemaker revision
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Pacemaker revision or reimplantation due to infective complications.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Level of C-reactive protein (mg/dl)
Time Frame: 3 days
|
C-reactive protein (CRP) levels will be measured from venous blood samples obtained from patients on the third day following the PPM implantation procedure.
|
3 days
|
Level of procalcitonin (mcg/dl)
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Procalcitonin (PCT) levels will be measured from venous blood samples obtained from patients on the third day following the PPM implantation procedure.
|
3 days
|
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (mm/hour)
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels will be measured from venous blood samples obtained from patients on the third day following the PPM implantation procedure.
|
3 days
|
Neutrophil-to-leukocyte ratio (NLR)
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Neutrophil-to-leukocyte ratio (NLR) levels will be measured from venous blood samples obtained from patients on the third day following the PPM implantation procedure.
|
3 days
|
Neutrophil count (cells/mm3)
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Neutrophil count levels will be measured from venous blood samples obtained from patients as part of complete blood count testing, on the third day following the PPM implantation procedure.
|
3 days
|
Leukocyte count (cells/mm3)
Time Frame: 3 days
|
Leukocyte (white blood cells) count levels will be measured from venous blood samples obtained from patients as part of complete blood count testing, on the third day following the PPM implantation procedure.
|
3 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Icmi D Rochmawati, M.D., University of Brawijaya
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 400/218/K.3/302/2023
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pacemaker Complication
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruitingComplication of Surgical Procedure | Pacemaker Complication | Pacemaker SyndromeChina
-
Charles University, Czech RepublicActive, not recruitingPacemaker Complication | MobilizationCzechia
-
China-Japan Friendship HospitalUnknownMechanical Complication of Cardiac PacemakerChina
-
Klinikum-FuerthKlinikum NürnbergRecruitingSurgery--Complications | Anesthesia Complication | Cardiac Pacemaker Malfunction | ICD Malfunction | Cardiac Pacemaker Electrical InterferenceGermany
-
Medical University of ViennaUnknownLate Complication From Cardiac Pacemaker ImplantationAustria
-
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesUnknownVenous Occlusion | Complication of Cardiac Defibrillator | Disorder of Cardiac Pacemaker SystemIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Eulji University HospitalChungnam National University Hospital; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Dankook UniversityRecruitingPacemaker ComplicationKorea, Republic of
-
Castilla-La Mancha Health ServiceUnknownComplication | Defibrillators | Pacemakers | Pacemaker Electrode Lead FractureSpain
-
Kaplan Medical CenterUnknownInfection, Bacterial | Pacemaker Complication
-
University of LeedsNational Institute for Health Research, United KingdomUnknownCongestive Heart Failure | Pacemaker ComplicationUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Cefazolin 1000 MG Injection
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTerminatedPostpartum Hemorrhage | Obstetric Complication | Postpartum EndometritisUnited States
-
Abdul El-RabbanyNot yet recruitingOrthognathic Surgical Site Infection
-
B. Braun Medical Inc.ParexelCompleted
-
B. Braun Medical Inc.Completed
-
CHU de Quebec-Universite LavalCompleted
-
University of MichiganAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)RecruitingSurgical ProphylaxisUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedPre-operative Prophylaxis With Vancomycin and Cefazolin in Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery PatientsAortic Valve Disorder | Congenital Heart DiseasesUnited States
-
Global Alliance for TB Drug DevelopmentCompletedFood Effect Study on the Bioavailability and PK of PA-824 Tablets in Healthy Adult Subjects (CL-003)TuberculosisUnited States
-
Spero TherapeuticsRecruitingNontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease (NTM-PD)United States