Radiotherapy vs Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease (Radioablate)

April 29, 2024 updated by: Saurabh Kumar, Western Sydney Local Health District

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with advanced structural heart disease. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the efficacy of SBRT compared to catheter ablation (CA) in achieving a ≥ 75% reduction in VT burden at 6 months
  • What is the comparable safety profile of SBRT vs CA Researchers will compare SBRT and CA (standard of care).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis

We hypothesise that in an open label randomised controlled trial of patients with advanced structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) will be superior in reducing VT burden compared to standard care comprising of catheter ablation (CA) and routine medical care with acceptable safety and adverse events.

Aims

This is a trial to examine if in an open label randomised trial of 60 patients with structural heart disease and VT followed for 3 years with a minimum follow up of 1 year of SBRT compared CA results in:

  1. An improvement in a primary outcome of proportion of patients with a ≥75% reduction in VT burden in the 6 months following intervention compared to the 6 months intervention
  2. Comparable safety profile (serious adverse events [SAE] and adverse events of special interest [AESI] at 6 months;
  3. reduction in secondary endpoints at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of: any VT recurrence, absolute % reduction in VT burden compared to 6 months pre-treatment, number of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) compared to pre-treatment, cardiovascular hospitalisation, all-cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, combined endpoint of cardiovascular hospitalisation/transplant/mortality, SAE and AESI from treatment, ventricular function abd change of quality of life (QOL) metrics (at 12 months).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Structural heart disease (including ischaemic cardiomyopathy , non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy or congenital heart disease and defined as any one of

    1. segmental or global decreased ventricular wall motion as defined by TTE, CT or cMRI
    2. myocardial hypertrophy
    3. myocardial scar (evidenced by late gadolinium enhancement on cMRI, wall thinning on cardiac CT, low voltage on electrophysiological study or abnormal intracardiac echocardiography)
  2. Recurrent monomorphic VT which can include

    1. at least one episode of VT treated by ICD and/or
    2. sustained VT (lasting >30s) and/or
    3. inducible sustained VT on invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) or non-invasive programmed stimulation (NIPS)
  3. PAINESD score of ≥9 points and/or at least moderate risk of VT recurrence or death as defined by the I-VT score. Both are validated tools used clinically to identify patient at high risk of VT recurrence and/or mortality after CA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 18 years
  2. Life expectancy < 3 months
  3. Catheter ablation deemed futile or with prohibitive risk by cardiac electrophysiologist.
  4. Unwilling or unable to provide consent
  5. Known cardiac channelopathies (e.g. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), long- or short QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome)
  6. Contraindications to radiotherapy as deemed by referring physician and/or radiation oncologist
  7. Pregnancy or breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stereotactic body radiation therapy
SBRT within 6 weeks of randomisation guided by previous electrophysiology studies, electrocardiograms and cardiac imaging.
Delivery of 25Gy in a single dose fraction to target area within 6 weeks of randomization
Active Comparator: Catheter ablation
CA within 6 weeks of randomisation (constituting standard of care for patients with VT and structural heart disease)
CA (endocardial and/or epicardial at operator discretion) within 6 weeks of randomization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VT burden
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in proportion of patients with a ≥75% reduction in VT burden at 6 months (number of VT episodes in 6 months post treatment compared to the number of VT episodes in the 6 months prior to randomisation excluding a 6-week blanking period after treatment initiation)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrent sustained VT
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Recurrent sustained VT ascertained by implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (VT identified and treated by the ICD with anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or internal ICD delivered shock or ≥30 seconds of VT if untreated by ICD
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
VT storm
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
VT storm (three or more documented episodes of VT within 24 hours or incessant VT)
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Absolute VT burden
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Absolute percentage reduction in VT burden compared to pre-ablation
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
Time Frame: At all time points up to 36 months
  1. SAE and AESI related to effects of SBRT
  2. SAE and AESI related to standard care e.g. medical anti-arrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation or heart transplantation
At all time points up to 36 months
ICD shocks
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator shocks
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Hospitalization
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Cardiovascular as well as specifically heart failure and arrhythmia
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
All cause mortality
Time Frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
All cause mortality
6,12, 24 and 36 months
Cardiovascular Mortality
Time Frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Cardiovascular mortality
6,12, 24 and 36 months
Composite outcome of VT recurrence/hospitalisation/death/ cardiac transplantation
Time Frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Composite outcome as above
6,12, 24 and 36 months
Ventricular function
Time Frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
As determined by echocardiography (ejection fraction, speckle tracking echocardiography)
6,12, 24 and 36 months
Quality of Life as per Short Form - 36 (SF-36) Score
Time Frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Change in quality of life at 6 and 12 months (compared to pre-intervention) as measured by Short Form- 36 (SF-36) [0-100 scale, 0 is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability].
6,12, 24 and 36 months
Quality of Life as per Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Concerns Questionnaire (ICDC) score
Time Frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Change in quality of life at 6 and 12 months (compared to pre-intervention) as measured by Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Concerns Questionnaire (ICDC) score. [0-100 scale, 100 equivalent to maximum concern]
6,12, 24 and 36 months
Number of AADs
Time Frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Number of AADs at time points following randomization
6,12, 24 and 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 20, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Clinical Trials on SBRT

3
Subscribe