Bacteriophage Therapy for Difficult-to-treat Infections: the Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Phage Task Force (PHAGEFORCE)

April 10, 2024 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
PHAGEFORCE is a prospective, observational registry study. The University Hospitals Leuven has approved the application of phage therapy as standard-of-care only in patients for whom no curative treatment alternatives (antibiotic and/or surgical) are available ('last-resort cases'). A multidisciplinary phage task force, referred to as the Coordination group for Bacteriophage therapy Leuven (CBL) was set up. The CBL screens patients with difficult-to-treat infections, evaluates who could benefit from phage therapy and sets up the treatment protocol. With this study, the CBL aims to gain insight in the safety and efficacy of phage therapy by integrating and optimizing phage therapy in five distinct medical disciplines (with distinct routes of administration), facilitating long-term follow-up of patients. Furthermore, this study will gain insight in the biodistribution and exact mechanisms of action of phage therapy and thus be able to provide standardized guidelines for each patient population and route of administration.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with difficult-to-treat musculoskeletal infections, chronic rhinosinusitis, sepsis, pulmonary infections associated with cystic fibrosis or bronchiectasis, or hidradenitis suppurativa, for whom no standard (curative) treatment options are available, are eligible for phage therapy. Patient eligibility is evaluated by the Coordination group for Bacteriophage therapy Leuven. If phages are available against the isolated bacterial species and the patient is found eligible for phage therapy, a phagogram is performed. Solely based on the results of the phagogram, the patient is either included in the phage treated or control group (standard (non-curative) treatment). In both cases, data is collected using REDCap.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with a musculoskeletal infection or sepsis or chronic rhinosinusitis or pulmonary infection (associated with bronchiectasis or cystic fibrosis) or hidradenitis suppurativa for whom all previous treatments (anti-inflammatory/antibiotic/surgical) have failed or are likely to fail, or for whom no other treatments are available (i.e. in case of antibiotic resistance).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients:

  • Diagnosed with a musculoskeletal infection or chronic rhinosinusitis or sepsis or lung infection (CF/Bx) or hidradenitis suppurativa, and
  • For whom all previous treatments (surgical and antibiotic) have failed or for whom no other treatment options are available (i.e., last resort cases, based on the assessment of the CBL), for example in case of bacterial resistance. And
  • Of whom the pathogen causative for the infection is one for which phages are available in the phage bank, and
  • Who have given informed consent to have their data collected in a patient registry

Exclusion Criteria:

All patients:

  • With an infectious disease other than those mentioned above, and/or
  • For whom standard treatment alternatives are still available. And/or
  • Of whom the pathogen causative for the infection is not one for which phages are available in the phage bank. And/or
  • Who refused to give their informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Phage treated group
Solely depending on the susceptibility of the isolates against the available phages (phagogram) the CBL will decide if the patient can be included in the phage treated group or the control group. Patients in the phage treated group will receive phage therapy according to the medical indication (local for musculoskeletal infections, hidradenitis suppurativa and CRS, through inhalation for pulmonary infections, intravenous for sepsis) on top of (surgical/antimicrobial) standard treatment.
Prospective data collection prior to, during and after phage treatment.
Prospective data collection prior to, during and after standard infection treatment.
Control group
Patients for whom the isolated pathogens are not susceptible to the available phages are included in the control group. These patients receive standard (non-curative) surgical/antimicrobial treatment.
Prospective data collection prior to, during and after phage treatment.
Prospective data collection prior to, during and after standard infection treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease free period
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment
1 year after treatment
Bacterial eradication
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
specific to sepsis patients, evaluated by negative hemocultures
3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS global health (patient-reported outcome measurement information system)
Time Frame: until 1 year after treatment
specific to musculoskeletal infections, chronic rhinosinusitis and pulmonary infections; higher scores mean better outcome
until 1 year after treatment
PROMIS (patient-reported outcome measurement information system) physical function
Time Frame: until 1 year after treatment
specific to musculoskeletal infections (higher scores mean better outcome)
until 1 year after treatment
PROMIS (patient-reported outcome measurement information system) pain interference
Time Frame: until 1 year after treatment
specific to musculoskeletal infections (higher scores mean worse outcome)
until 1 year after treatment
Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22
Time Frame: until 1 year after treatment
specific to chronic rhinosinusitis, lower scores mean a better outcome
until 1 year after treatment
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: until 1 year after treatment
specific to chronic rhinosinusitis and hidradenitis suppurativa, higher scores mean more pain
until 1 year after treatment
Cystic fibrosis questionnaire (CF-Q-R)
Time Frame: until 1 year after treatment
specific to pulmonary infections, higher scores mean better quality of life
until 1 year after treatment
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: until 1 year after treatment
specific to hidradenitis suppurativa, higher scores mean worse outcome (impaired quality of life)
until 1 year after treatment
Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQoL)
Time Frame: until 1 year after treatment
specific to hidradenitis suppurativa, higher scores indicate a higher level of symptomatology (worse outcomes)
until 1 year after treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of exacerbations
Time Frame: until 12 months after treatment
specific to pulmonary infections
until 12 months after treatment
Abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with Hidradenitis suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR)
Time Frame: until 3 months after treatment
specific to hidradenitis suppurativa. At least a 50% reduction from baseline in the total AN count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count
until 3 months after treatment
Lund-Mackay CT score
Time Frame: until 3 months after treatment
specific to chronic rhinosinusitis, higher scores mean more occlusion
until 3 months after treatment
Lund Kennedy endoscopy score
Time Frame: until 3 months after treatment
specific to chronic rhinosinusitis, higher scores mean more occlusion
until 3 months after treatment
Modified Davos score
Time Frame: until 3 months after treatment
specific to chronic rhinosinusitis, higher scores mean more occlusion
until 3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Prospective data collection

3
Subscribe