REspiratory diSEAse cohoRt Studies of CHinese Medicine for Asthma (RESEARCH- Asthma)

The purpose of this study is to define the standard use of TCM treatment regimen as the TCM cohort group and the non-TCM cohort group of those who use conventional Western medicine treatment without the standard TCM treatment regimen through a multi-center, large-sample prospective cohort study design. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of TCM treatment regimens in the treatment of bronchial asthma, and to provide high-quality evidence for the promotion and application of TCM syndrome differentiation treatment in bronchial asthma.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Bronchial asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation of the airways, which is often recurrent, long-lasting and difficult to cure. Clinical studies have confirmed that the clinical symptoms and quality of life of asthma patients have been significantly improved after TCM intervention. However, most of the current clinical research methods on asthma are small-sample and RCT studies, resulting in insufficient demonstration of efficacy, and there is an urgent need to carry out multi-center, large-sample, high-quality real-world studies in order to obtain higher quality evidence-based medical evidence.

This is a multi-center, large-sample prospective cohort study, which will evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of TCM treatment regimens in the treatment of bronchial asthma, and provide high-quality evidence for the promotion and application of TCM syndrome differentiation therapy in bronchial asthma. The cohort study will enroll 1508 patients, and the standard use of TCM treatment regimen will be set as the TCM cohort group, and those who will use the conventional treatment of Western medicine but not the standard TCM treatment regimen will be the non-TCM cohort group. The asthma control rate was the main outcome index, and the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), asthma quality of life score (AQLQ), clinical symptom and sign score, lung function, exhaled nitric oxide, induced sputum inflammation phenotype, glucocorticoid dose, and fast-acting β2 agonist dose were the secondary outcome indicators. Follow-up was conducted every 3 months for 1 year.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1508

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are eligible for a diagnosis of bronchial asthma disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who meet the diagnosis of bronchial asthma;
  2. Age 18~80 years old;
  3. Have not participated in other clinical studies within 1 month before enrollment;
  4. Voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation during acute asthma exacerbation;
  2. Delirium, impaired consciousness, dementia, and various mental illnesses;
  3. Patients with other lung diseases such as COPD, lung abscess, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, etc., and severe liver and kidney diseases;
  4. Patients with neuromuscular diseases that affect respiratory motor function and are unable to complete the six-minute walk test;
  5. Pregnant and lactating patients;
  6. Those who are participating in other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Traditional Chinese Medical cohort
The standardized use of TCM treatment regimen was regarded as an exposure factor, and the treatment methods of the enrolled patients were defined and grouped: patients who took medication continuously for more than 3 months per year, or who took medication intermittently for more than 6 months in the total time of the year, were in the exposure group.
Non Traditional Chinese Medical cohort
Those who used conventional Western medicine treatment without using standardized Chinese medicine treatment regimen were in the non-exposure group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asthma control rate
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
According to the composite indicators such as symptoms, medication and pulmonary function test results, the clinical control level of asthma was divided into complete control, partial control and uncontrolled, and the asthma control rate of patients was evaluated according to the clinical control level of asthma.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of exacerbations
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
The number of acute attacks is mainly recorded
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Asthma exacerbation severity
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Worsening lung function during asthma attacks is characterized by decreased expiratory flow, and the severity of the exacerbation can be graded by the patient's symptoms, lung function, and arterial blood gas analysis.According to the frequency of daytime and nighttime asthma attacks and pulmonary function test results, the patients were divided into 4 grades, namely: 1 intermittent attack; 2 mild persistent; 3 moderate persistent and 4 severe persistent.The severity of the asthma attack was assessed using a rating scale.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Change in severity of chronic persistent disease
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Although the patient does not have an acute attack of asthma, there are still symptoms such as wheezing, cough, chest tightness and other symptoms with different frequency and degrees for a long time, which may be accompanied by decreased pulmonary ventilation function. The severity of chronic persistent asthma can be classified into four levels: intermittent, mildly persistent, moderately persistent, and severely persistent, according to the frequency of daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms and the results of pulmonary function tests.The severity of the asthma attack was assessed using a rating scale.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
The dose used by glucocorticoids
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Corticosteroids are the drug of choice for long-term asthma treatment. The vast majority of patients with chronic persistent asthma are well controlled by inhaling low-dose corticosteroids (equivalent to 400 micrograms of budesonide per day).
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Rapid-acting beta2 agonists use drugs and doses
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Beta2 agonists are asthma drugs that stimulate beta2 receptors distributed on airway smooth muscle to produce bronchodilating effects. These drugs are bronchodilators and are the drugs of choice for acute asthma attacks (airway spasm), which can quickly improve symptoms such as dyspnea, cough, etc. If given by inhalation, salbutamol 100-200mcg or terbutaline 250-500mcg at a time and repeat every 20 minutes if necessary.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Asthma Control Test (ACT) score
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
The ACT score correlates well with the level of asthma control in patients as assessed by experts. The questionnaire included wheezing symptoms, activity limitations, frequency of use of rescue medication, patients' asthma control and self-assessment, with a total of 5 items. Each item is scored on a scale of 1~5, with a total score of 5~25 points, and the higher the score, the better the control of asthma symptoms.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
The ACQ questionnaire will measure the quality of life associated with asthma. The ACQ questionnaire consists of either 7 questions (ACQ-7) or 6 questions (ACQ-6). In questions 1-6, patients recalled their experiences from the previous 7 days and answered using a scale of 7 (from 0 = complete control to 6 = very poor control). The seventh question refers to % FEV1 of the reference value and must be completed by the staff of the website. The questionnaire score is the average of either 7 responses (ACQ-7) or 6 responses (ACQ-6). The score is interpreted as follows: 0.75 or less: adequate asthma control. From 0.75 to 1.50: partially controlled asthma. Over 1.50: inadequate asthma control.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Asthma Quality of Life Score (AQLQ)
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
It is used to measure the severity of asthma and its impact on patients' quality of life, including 35 items in 5 aspects. The AQLQ score relates to activity limitation, asthma symptoms, psychological condition, response to stimuli, and concern for one's own health, and the form assesses the degree of impact of asthma on a 7-point scale, with a maximum impact of 1 point and no impact of 7 points.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Anxiety Self-Assessment Form (SAS)
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
It included 20 items reflecting the subjective feelings of anxiety, and each item was divided into four levels according to the frequency of symptoms, including 15 positive scores and 5 reverse scores. The cut-off value for the standard deviation of SAS is 50 points, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of anxiety.Among them, 50 to 59 are classified as mild anxiety, 60 to 69 are classified as moderate anxiety, and more than 69 are severe anxiety.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Depression Self-Rating Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
The SDS Depression and Anxiety Test Form contains 20 items, which are scored on a 4-point scale, with 1 indicating occasional symptoms, 2 indicating sometimes symptoms, 3 indicating frequent symptoms, and 4 indicating persistent symptoms. A rough score is obtained by adding the scores in each of the 20 items. Multiply the rough score by 1.25 and then take the integer part to get the standard score. Generally speaking, depression with a total score of less than 52 is normal, 53-62 is mild depression, 63-72 is moderate depression, and 72 or more is severe depression. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Pulmonary function
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
FVC, FEV1, FEV1 % of the estimated value, FEV1/FVC were mainly used for evaluation.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)
Time Frame: The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.
The measuring instrument uses an exhaled nitric oxide measurement system to record the FeNO value of the patient.
The follow-up period was followed up every 3 months for 1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bronchial Asthma

3
Subscribe