DermAI to Evaluate Human Factor of Testing

August 20, 2025 updated by: Matthew Hall, Mayo Clinic

Adaptive Deployment of DermAI to Evaluate Human Factor of Testing

The purpose of this research is to improve how well remote patch allergy testing works and make sure they are easy and practical for people to use from home.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

151

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic in Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Willing and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has used topical or oral steroids two weeks prior to patch testing.
  • Currently taking immunosuppression agents or is immunocompromised due to medical condition.
  • No sunburn or rash at site of testing.
  • Women who are breastfeeding or pregnant.
  • Treatment with ultraviolet (UV) light (including tanning) during the two weeks prior to visit.
  • Subjects unable to comply with patch test study requirements including multiple return visits and activity restrictions (e.g., protecting patch test area from excess moisture due to showering).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DermAI and Patch Allergen Testing
Subjects will have two allergen patches on their forearms for 48 hours. After 48 hours, the patches will be removed and a photograph will be taken where the patches were placed. This photograph will undergo interpretation by a medical professional and by the AI algorithm (DermAI) to evaluate for positive allergic reactions.
Interpretation of skin test patch regions via artificial intelligence (AI)
Other Names:
  • DermAI
Contains dime-sized disks which have different substance to which a person may be allergic. Two different patches were used due to the number of allergens being tested. Each patch can only hold 10 allergens and 14 allergens were tested in patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Classification of Test Site Region Reaction
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of skin patch interpretations using novel AI algorithms analysis to be in concordant with human review interpretation for the classification of regions within the test panel that either were a reaction (reaction grade 1+) or no reaction (grade 0).
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Classification of Test Site Region Using a 5-point Scale Where Skin Patch Interpretations Were a Grade 0
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of skin patch interpretations using novel AI algorithms analysis to be in concordant with human review interpretation for the classification of the test site region using a 5-point scale: Grades 0 - 4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
1 week
Classification of Test Site Region Using a 5-point Scale Where Skin Patch Interpretations Were a Grade 1
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of skin patch interpretations using novel AI algorithms analysis to be in concordant with human review interpretation for the classification of the test site region using a 5-point scale: Grades 0 - 4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
1 week
Classification of Test Site Region Using a 5-point Scale Where Skin Patch Interpretations Were a Grade 2
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of skin patch interpretations using novel AI algorithms analysis to be in concordant with human review interpretation for the classification of the test site region using a 5-point scale: Grades 0 - 4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
1 week
Classification of Test Site Region Using a 5-point Scale Where Skin Patch Interpretations Were a Grade 3
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of skin patch interpretations using novel AI algorithms analysis to be in concordant with human review interpretation for the classification of the test site region using a 5-point scale: Grades 0 - 4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
1 week
Classification of Test Site Region Using a 5-point Scale Where Skin Patch Interpretations Were a Grade 4
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of skin patch interpretations using novel AI algorithms analysis to be in concordant with human review interpretation for the classification of the test site region using a 5-point scale: Grades 0 - 4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
1 week
False Positive Rate
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of false positive AI interpretations
1 week
False Negative Rate
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of false negative AI interpretations
1 week
Early Termination of Testing
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of early termination of testing
1 week
Participants That Removed Patches Early
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of participants that removed patches early
1 week
Adverse Events Related to Allergen Exposure
Time Frame: 1 week
Number of adverse events related to allergen exposure
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Hall, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23-007636

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contact Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on AI algorithm to evaluate photographs of skin test patch regions

Subscribe