Efficacy of Acupuncture for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Related Constipation (AFPDC)

April 30, 2024 updated by: Xi'an No.3 Hospital

Acupuncture for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Related Constipation

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in treating Parkinson's disease related constipation (PDC). In the randomized controlled clinical trial study, patients meeting the criteria for inclusion will be randomly enrolled and divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: the acupuncture group and the sham acupuncture group. The intervention is going to be executed using the acupoints EX-HN1(Sishencong),LI4 (Hegu),ST25 (Tianshu),ST37(Shangjuxu),ST36(Zusanli),ST44 (Neiting), ST44 (Taichong), SP6 (Sanyinjiao) and CV4 (Shuangyuan).The acupuncture needles will be inserted to a depth of 0.8 to 1 cm in the acupuncture group. The sham acupuncture group's needles will be inserted to a depth of 0.2 to 0.3 cm with nonacupuncture points located 0.5 cm in lateral to the real acupoint or to the right for midline points. During the study, researchers will observe changes in complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs), Constipation Symptom and Efficacy Assessment Scale (CSEAS) (including the six dimensions of difficulty, Bristol, time, incompleteness, frequency,and bloating), the Patient-Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL), and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12).Colonic transit time measurement and conventional anorectal manometry were evaluated at the above time points.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Age, sex, duration of disease, and equivalent daily dose of levodopa were assessed at baseline. From the beginning of the baseline phase to the end of the follow-up phase, patients were requested to complete an electronic bowel diary, which was supervised by an independent outcome assessor. The primary outcome in this study was the number of weekly CSBMs. Weekly CSBMs were collected at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12. Anorectal manometry (AM) and colonic transit time (TT) were assessed in the two groups using standardized procedures. In brief, for TT evaluation, patients swallowed a capsule containing 24 radiopaque markers. Abdominal radiographs from patients in the erect posture were acquired 5 days after markers intake. During the test period, patients were instructed to maintain their habitual diet and to avoid laxatives, enema and suppositories. According to manufacturer's indications, the TT was described as "normal" if at least 19 markers (80%) were expelled at day 5. The AM was performed using the stationed pull-through technique, with a 4-channel water-perfused catheter linked to an electronic manometer. The catheter was inserted via the anal canal and positioned in the rectum, with the patient in a left-lateral decubitus position. Functional parameters included the resting and squeeze pressures, the ability of the anal sphincter to relax with straining, the recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) and the rectal sensation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710018
        • Recruiting
        • Xi 'an No.3 Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A diagnosis of PD (according to the Movement Disorder Society's revised clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease in 2015) and functional constipation (according to the Rome IV diagnostic criteria) ;
  2. Age between 35 and 80 years;
  3. Hoehn-Yahr grade ≤ 3;
  4. No medications taken within 2 weeks that may affect gastrointestinal function (such as prucalopride and probiotics);
  5. No anticipation in other clinical trials within 1 month;
  6. Voluntary engagement in this study, ability to sign the informed consent, and cooperation in the completion of the bowel diary and scale filling.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Organic lesions of the digestive system (such as intestinal adhesions, obstructions, tumors, or malformations in the gastrointestinal tract);
  2. A history of abdominal or anorectal surgery that may affect intestinal transit, systemic diseases that may affect the dynamics of the digestive tract (such as diabetes and hyperthyroidism);
  3. Serious life-threatening diseases (such as severe cardiovascular diseases and malignant tumors);
  4. Skin lesions that were inappropriate for needling, the viscose allergy that prevented acupuncture device attachment;
  5. Pregnant or lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The Acupuncture Group
The intervention is going to be executed using the acupoints EX-HN1(Sishencong),LI4 (Hegu),ST25 (Tianshu),ST37(Shangjuxu),ST36(Zusanli),ST44 (Neiting), ST44 (Taichong), SP6 (Sanyinjiao) and CV4 (Shuangyuan).The acupuncture needles will be inserted to a depth of 0.8 to 1 cm in the acupuncture group.
All acupoints were selected based on traditional Chinese medicine theory and previous articles on PD and constipation.
Sham Comparator: The Sham Acupuncture Group
The sham acupuncture group's needles will be inserted to a depth of 0.2 to 0.3 cm with nonacupuncture points located 0.5 cm in lateral to the real acupoint or to the right for midline points.
All acupoints were selected based on traditional Chinese medicine theory and previous articles on PD and constipation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of weekly CSBMs
Time Frame: Weekly CSBMs were collected at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
Complete spontaneous bowel movements
Weekly CSBMs were collected at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constipation Symptom and Efficacy Assessment Scale (CSEAS)
Time Frame: CSEAS were collected at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
Including the six dimensions of difficulty, Bristol, time, incompleteness, frequency, and bloating
CSEAS were collected at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
Patient-Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL)
Time Frame: PAC-QOL were collected at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
To assess quality of life in patients with constipation. It includes questions about the impact of constipation symptoms on the daily life of the patient, such as difficult defecation, bloating, abdominal pain, etc.
PAC-QOL were collected at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
Time Frame: These were assessed at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
To assess the severity and symptoms
These were assessed at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
TT
Time Frame: TT was assessed at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
Colonic transit time
TT was assessed at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
AM
Time Frame: AM was assessed at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.
Anorectal manometry
AM was assessed at baseline (week 0), post-treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 12), and differences from baseline levels were compared at week 4 and week 12.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gejuan Zhang, Doctor, The dean

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data is managed by the project team and can be shared according to individual needs

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Acupuncture

3
Subscribe