A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Instructional Videos and Live Demonstrations in Crown Preparation Training for Preclinical Dental Students

May 17, 2024 updated by: Dr Maria Shakoor, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine

Exploring Pedagogical Approaches: A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Instructional Videos and Live Demonstrations in Crown Preparation Training for Preclinical Dental Students

finding the optimal balance between traditional live demonstrations and instructional videos remains a subject of ongoing discussion in dental education. Moreover, integrating a hybrid model that combines the strengths of both methods may offer a comprehensive approach to crown preparation training.

Therefore, this study aims to address this ongoing discussion by investigating the relative effectiveness of traditional live demonstrations, instructional videos, and a hybrid model that merges both approaches. Through an evaluation of dental students' satisfaction and performance with video tutorials and hands-on demonstrations, this research endeavors to shed light on how different instructional methods influence knowledge acquisition within the practical environment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A randomized controlled single-blind trial was conducted at the Department of Prosthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine for a duration of 12 months from 12th Jan' 2023 till 11th Jan' 2024.

Prior approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine (AIDM/ERC/01/2023/02). written consent was obtained from all participants, A simple random sampling technique was used for the recruitment of participants. .

a total of ninety-six final-year BDS students were enrolled in the study. Before allocation, all participants attended a comprehensive lecture on crown preparation principles delivered via a PowerPoint presentation. Following the lecture, participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A (instructional video), Group B (live demonstrations), or Group C (hybrid)

Participants in Group A will view an instructional video, group B will attend live demonstrations.

Participants in Group C received a dual approach, combining instructional video guidance with live demonstrations.

Before the intervention, all participants across the three groups underwent a pretest consisting of five questions. These questions were designed to gauge participants' readiness and perceptions regarding crown preparation training. Responses were recorded using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 represented "strongly disagree" and 5 represented "strongly agree".

Following the lecture and demonstrations, participants were provided with an assessment questionnaire comprising six questions aimed at evaluating their comprehension and knowledge regarding porcelain-fused-to-metal tooth preparation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Karachi, Pakistan, 75500
        • Altamash Institute of dental medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fourth-year students of Bachelor of Surgery who voluntarily agreed to participate were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria include students who do not provide consent, those absent from tutorials, individuals with prior experience in crown preparation, or students with medical conditions affecting participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: instructional video
Participants in Group A received access to a specially prepared pre-recorded instructional video detailing the step-by-step process of porcelain-fused-to-metal tooth preparation for molars
Participants in Group A received access to a specially prepared pre-recorded instructional video detailing the step-by-step process of porcelain-fused-to-metal tooth preparation for molars.
Experimental: live demonstrations
live demonstrations of the same procedure conducted by the same experienced Prosthodontist to ensure consistency in teaching quality and technique.
Participants in Group B were provided with live demonstrations of the same procedure conducted by the same experienced Prosthodontist to ensure consistency in teaching quality and technique
Experimental: hybrid
both video and live demonstrations will be given
Group C received a dual approach, combining instructional video guidance with live demonstrations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proficiency in Crown Preparation after instructional Videos and Live Demonstrations i
Time Frame: 12 months
Proficiency in Crown Preparation: Assessed by a standardized scoring chart evaluating key areas such as preparation axis, axial reduction, anatomic reduction, occlusal convergence, occlusal reduction depth, morphology, quality of axial/occlusal line angles, finish line location, form, continuity, and surface texture. Each area is scored to give a total proficiency score out of 20. Measurements will be taken immediately following the intervention period."
12 months
students perception about the demonstration techniques of the three groups
Time Frame: 12 months
Before the intervention, all participants across the three groups underwent a pretest consisting of five questions. These questions were designed to gauge participants' readiness and perceptions regarding crown preparation training. Specifically, the questions addressed stress levels during preparation, the duration of preclinical training, the effectiveness of lectures and training, and readiness for clinical practice. Responses were recorded using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 represented "strongly disagree" and 5 represented "strongly agree".
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AIDM/ERC/01/2023/02

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical Education

Clinical Trials on Group A (instructional video),

3
Subscribe