- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03141307
The Effect of Electronic Informed Consent Information (EICI) on Residual Newborn Specimen Research (EICI)
Obtaining adequate informed consent from potential research participants is a significant challenge for biobank-dependent research. To maintain public trust and support, it is important to establish an informed decision-making process for the collection and use of biospecimens collected within clinical settings. For the majority of all infants born in the US, residual dried blood biospecimens are generated after newborn screening is completed. Some programs choose to store these specimens for several uses including biomedical research. Identifying ways to improve comprehension about broad consent for future biobank-dependent research is a national priority. Specific Aim 1: Identify the key information items necessary to make an informed decision about broad consent for the retention and future research use of residual biospecimens. Methods include focus groups with new parents to determine key information elements relevant to consent for use of residual biospecimens within the Michigan BioTrust. Additional meetings with IRB personnel within the participating hospitals, health departments and universities will also be conducted to ascertain their expectations and requirements for the consent process. Specific Aim 2: Based on the data collected in Aim 1, create a state-of-the-art electronic informed consent information (EICI) tool for use in the clinical setting about the retention and use of residual biospecimens. The award-winning Genetic Science Learning Center will develop the professional EICI in Spanish and English. Validation of the EICI will be completed using feedback from both community and scientific advisory boards for the Michigan BioTrust. Specific Aim 3: Evaluate the EICI consent approach by comparing it to: a) traditional consent delivered on an electronic tablet; and b) the current paper-based consent approach. Both Spanish and English speaking parents (n = 630) in the state of Michigan, where informed consent is required for biobank research during postpartum clinical care, will be recruited and randomized to one of three groups. Specific Aim 4: Assess feasibility of the EICI through focus groups and interviews with birthing hospitals and Department of Community Health staff before and after the intervention.
- Hypothesis 1) Women in the Interactive technology group (Group A) and the video group (Group B) will demonstrate higher knowledge at Time 1 and Time 2 about the consent elements and the BioTrust than those who do not receive either EICI tool (Group C).
- Hypothesis 2) Women in the EICI groups (Groups A and B) will demonstrate lower decisional conflict at Time 1 and Time 2 toward biobanking than those who do not receive the EICI (Group C).
- Hypothesis 3) Women in the EICI groups (Groups A and B) will not differ significantly in their choices about biobanking and attitudes toward NBS and biobank research compared to participants who do not receive EICI tool (Group C).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
For the intervention, a research assistant (RA) at each hospital, with permission of the healthcare professional, will ask potential participants if they are interested in participating in this study. If they are interested, the RAs will seek verbal consent for this study at this time. The RA will inform patients that when a healthcare provider comes into their room about the BioTrust, they will have the study information for them.
Then the RAs at the labor and deliver units of the hospitals will give an iPad to the healthcare providers seeking consent for the BioTrust. The healthcare providers will be blind to the study group assignment until they enter the patient's room. When a healthcare professional enters a patients' room, she will touch the iPad to see the study group assignment. Participants will be randomized to one of three study groups and this will be programmed automatically on the iPad. If they are in Group A or B, the healthcare providers will give the iPad to the patients to watch or read the consent information. If they are in Group C (control group) the standard brochure will be given about the BioTrust. Immediately following their decision, all participants will complete a brief knowledge survey on the iPad.
This recruitment approach mirrors the current clinical encounter for the BioTrust. This current approach is as follows. After newborn screening is completed, a healthcare professional approaches the mother in the hospital and provides them with the Michigan BioTrust brochure (see appendix) and then asks for the mother to consent to allow or not allow their infants' residual DBS to be stored in the Michigan BioTrust. This consent form is a simply check for yes and no with their signature and is attached to the back of the newborn screening card. For this study, after they receive the information in any of the study groups, all participants will still be required to sign this same consent form because it is attached to the physical sample of the newborn screening blood specimens.
All participating women will complete a survey 1) immediately following the intervention/control on the electronic table (Time 1) and 2) also will be surveyed by telephone 2-4 weeks follow up (Time 2).
Drs. Rothwell, Johnson and Tarini will provide guidance for the coordination of the clinical sites, due to their extensive experience. To ensure success there will be at least weekly communication between the sites and the Project Director, Dr. Johnson and monthly among the site personnel. Drs. Botkin, Rothwell and Johnson will visit each site prior to implementation of data collection to introduce the project and discuss issues sites may have. Once the RAs have been hired at each site they will provide weekly reports of activities and recruitment to the Research team in Utah. Monthly a teleconference will be held and the Site PI's will report on activities and recruitment to the Utah research team and the other site PI. Consistency among the sites will be monitored with these reports and communication strategies. Research team coordination with communication and meetings is based on the successful accomplishment of previous research project (R01 HD058854).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48913
- Michigan Department of Health & Human Services
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria
- adult (> 18 years)
- English-speaking
- Recently given birth and are already being approached for participation in the Michigan BioTrust.
- Partner of woman who has recently given birth and is already being approached for participation in the Michigan BioTrust
Exclusion criteria
- Newborn baby is in the NICU
- Unable to speak English
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Intervention
The EICI intervention group will receive an electronic interactive tool with movie clips and external links available through the tool.
The movie intervention group will watch the educational consent movie and receive the standard paper-based brochure.
|
The purpose of this intervention is to improve comprehension about broad consent for future biobank-dependent research by watching a brief video.
The purpose of this intervention is to improve comprehension about broad consent for future biobank-dependent research by exploring an educational app.
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control
This group will receive the standard of care currently used (paper-based brochure)
|
Standard of care, paper-based brochure
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comprehension for Biobanking at Time of Consent
Time Frame: Administered immediately after the intervention
|
Questions based on the 16-item biobank checklist developed from consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension for biobanking (see Beskow et al. 2014). This measure assesses a person's understanding of the Michigan BioTrust program. Scale range: 0-1 The reported scale is derived from the number of correct answers divided by 20 for a percentage correct. Thus, a score of .6 indicates a 60% correct response rate. Higher values indicate more comprehension of the presented information. Lower values indicate less comprehension of the presented information. |
Administered immediately after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Quality of Informed Consent
Time Frame: Administered immediately after the intervention
|
The Quality of Informed Consent assesses how well the participant self-reports their understanding different aspects of the study he/she consented into (Joffe et al., 2001).
Scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better self-reported understanding of the elements of consent.
The scale is created by taking the mean of 14 items.
|
Administered immediately after the intervention
|
Attitudes Survey
Time Frame: Administered at the 2-4 week follow-up
|
Assesses support of the Michigan BioTrust program.
This is a single item assessment.
Full scale range is 1 to 4. Higher values indicate more support of the Michigan BioTrust.
The scale is a likert scale: 1 = Not supportive at all, 4 = Very supportive
|
Administered at the 2-4 week follow-up
|
Residual Comprehension for Biobanking
Time Frame: Administered at the 2-4 week follow-up
|
This is a repetition of the Comprehension for Biobanking survey assessed immediately after the intervention. The residual Comprehension for Biobanking survey assesses a person's retention of knowledge of the Michigan BioTrust program two to 4 weeks after the intervention. Scale range: 0-1 The reported scale is derived from the number of correct answers divided by 20 for a percentage correct. Thus, a score of .6 indicates a 60% correct response rate. Higher values indicate more comprehension of the presented information. Lower values indicate less comprehension of the presented information. |
Administered at the 2-4 week follow-up
|
Residual Quality of Informed Consent
Time Frame: Administered at the 2-4 week follow-up
|
Assessment of how well the participant understood different aspects of the study after a gap in time. The Residual Quality of Informed Consent is a repetition of the Quality of Informed Consent measure, now provided 2-4 weeks after the intervention. This measure assesses how well the participant self-reports their understanding different aspects of the study he/she consented into (Joffe et al., 2001). Scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better self-reported understanding of the elements of consent. The scale is created by taking the mean of 14 items. |
Administered at the 2-4 week follow-up
|
Residual Decisional Regret
Time Frame: Administered at the 2-4 week follow-up
|
The Residual Decisional Regret measure assesses a person's feelings of regret after making a decision (in this specific case, participation in the Michigan BioTrust).
Scores range from 1 to 5 with lower values indicating better outcomes due to less regret.
The scale is created by taking the mean of 5 items.
|
Administered at the 2-4 week follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Botkin, MD, University of Utah
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.
- Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001 Nov 24;358(9295):1772-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06805-2.
- Beskow LM, Dombeck CB, Thompson CP, Watson-Ormond JK, Weinfurt KP. Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension. Genet Med. 2015 Mar;17(3):226-33. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.102. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
- Rothwell E, Johnson E, Wong B, Goldenberg A, Tarini BA, Riches N, Stark LA, Pries C, Langbo C, Langen E, Botkin J. Comparison of Video, App, and Standard Consent Processes on Decision-Making for Biospecimen Research: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):252-260. doi: 10.1177/1556264620913455. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 81352
- 1R01HD082148 (NIH)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neonatal Screening
-
University of UtahAlbert Einstein College of Medicine; University of California, San Francisco; National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and other collaboratorsCompletedNeonatal Screening
-
Erin RothwellEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Not yet recruitingImplementation Science | Informed Consent | Neonatal Screening
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompletedNewborn | Neonatal ScreeningFrance
-
PediatrixCompletedPrematurity | Parenteral Nutrition | Neonatal ScreeningUnited States
-
University Hospital, RouenUniversity Hospital, CaenRecruitingLysosomal Storage Diseases | Neonatal ScreeningFrance
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteISBRG CorpRecruiting
-
Max Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterCompleted
-
Kettering Health NetworkBilimetrix s.r.l.RecruitingKernicterus | Point-of-Care Testing | Neonatal Screening | Newborn JaundiceUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Recruiting
-
Lanxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineZhejiang Cancer Hospital; Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityActive, not recruiting
Clinical Trials on EICI Movie
-
Ege UniversityCompletedPain | Postoperative Pain | Surgery | Fear | Nursing Caries | Nurse's Role | Pediatric | Patient | Clinical AnxietyTurkey
-
Leiden University Medical CenterCompletedBlood Coagulation Disorder
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedAnxiety Linked to the Surgery and / or AnesthesiaFrance
-
University of UtahAlbert Einstein College of Medicine; University of California, San Francisco; National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and other collaboratorsCompletedNeonatal Screening
-
University Hospital, AngersRecruitingConsciousness DisorderFrance
-
Instituto de Cardiologia de Santa CatarinaCompletedCoronary Artery DiseaseBrazil
-
University GhentResearch Foundation Flanders; Flemish Agency for Care and HealthCompletedPhysical Activity | Parenting | Parents | Sedentary Behavior | Healthy Diet | Primary SchoolchildrenBelgium
-
Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaHospital Mutua de TerrassaCompletedAmblyopia | Anisometropic Amblyopia | Strabismic AmblyopiaSpain
-
Laboratoire TIMC-IMAGUnknown