Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

A School-based Intervention Project to Increase Completion of Upper Secondary School in Norway (COMPLETE)

24 mars 2020 mis à jour par: Torill Bogsnes Larsen, University of Bergen

COMPLETE - a School-based Intervention Project to Improve Psychosocial Learning Environments and Increase Completion of Upper Secondary School in Norway: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Drop out from upper secondary school represents a risk for the future health and wellbeing of young people. Strengthening of psychosocial aspects of the learning environment may be an effective strategy to promote completion of upper secondary school. The COMPLETE study is a school based cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating two school-based interventions, namely the Dream School Program (DSP) and the Mental Health Support Team (MHST) among 1st grade upper secondary school students in four counties in Norway. The interventions aim to improve psychosocial learning environments and subsequently school achievements and decrease drop-out and absence.

Specifically, the COMPLETE study will

  1. Evaluate whether the DSP alone

    1. increases completion
    2. increases presence
    3. improves school achievements
    4. improves mental health and wellbeing
  2. Evaluate whether the DSP and the MHST combined

    1. increase completion
    2. increase presence
    3. improve school achievements
    4. improve mental health and wellbeing

    The COMPLETE study will also evaluate the effect of the DSP and MHST combined and the DSP alone against secondary outcomes of school satisfaction and loneliness.

  3. Evaluate through a process evaluation whether the interventions were implemented in line with guidelines for each of the interventions, and whether the degree of program fidelity has influenced the effect of the interventions on the primary and secondary outcomes.

Aperçu de l'étude

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

3500

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

15 ans et plus (Enfant, Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • School inclusion criteria: not been or currently involved in either of the Dream School Program or the Mental Health Support Team or similar programs or research projects
  • Student inclusion criteria: student enrolled at any of the included schools.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Schools previously or currently involved in either of the Dream School Program or the Mental Health Support Team or similar programs or research projects.
  • Student exclusion criteria: students with special needs or who are illiterate in Norwegian are excluded from the survey assessment, but included in the interventions.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Dream School Program (DSP)
The Dream School Program is a whole school program, involving staff and students, with the aim of creating learning environments where students are confident and experience a sense of belonging, and where mental health is promoted.
The Dream School program is a whole school program, involving staff and students, with the aim of creating learning environments where students are confident and experience a sense of belonging, and where mental health is promoted.
Autres noms:
  • Drømmeskolen (Norwegian name)
Expérimental: DSP and Mental Health Support Team

A combination of the universal Dream Schoop Program (see description above) and the selective/indicative intervention Mental Health Support Team which is aimed at specific students at risk of dropping out of upper secondary school. It is a systematization of the student services through

  1. Co-location of services and staff working in services
  2. "One open door" to increase accessibility to the services and staff for students
  3. Focus on the transition from lower to upper secondary school
  4. Close follow-up of students at risk to ensure tailored help to each student
  5. Early intervention and follow up when students starts being absent from school
The Dream School program is a whole school program, involving staff and students, with the aim of creating learning environments where students are confident and experience a sense of belonging, and where mental health is promoted.
Autres noms:
  • Drømmeskolen (Norwegian name)

MHST is also a whole school project but aimed at specific students at risk of dropping out. It is a systematisation of the student services through

  1. Co-location of services and staff working in services
  2. "One open door" to increase accessibility to the services and staff for students
  3. Focus on the transition from lower to upper secondary school
  4. Close follow-up of students at risk to ensure tailored help to each student
  5. Early intervention and follow up when students starts being absent from school This work demands cross- and multidisciplinary collaborations within the MHST, between MHST and school leadership, and between lower and upper secondary schools.
Autres noms:
  • Nærværsteam (Norwegian name)
Aucune intervention: Control
The control group are upper secondary schools who run classes and the school as usual, and do not introduce new programs similar to the Dream School or Mental Health Support Team during the project period.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Drop-out
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 10 months
If the student has not complete upper secondary school within five years or if the student quit school and is without any regular activity during the course of the study period, i.e. grade 1-3 of upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 10 months
Drop-out
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 22 months
If the student has not complete upper secondary school within five years or if the student quit school and is without any regular activity during the course of the study period, i.e. grade 1-3 of upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 22 months
Drop-out
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 34 months
If the student has not complete upper secondary school within five years or if the student quit school and is without any regular activity during the course of the study period, i.e. grade 1-3 of upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 34 months
Drop-out
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 58 months
If the student has not complete upper secondary school within five years or if the student quit school and is without any regular activity during the course of the study period, i.e. grade 1-3 of upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 58 months
Absence
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 10 months
Total days and hours absent at closure of first school year in upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 10 months
Absence
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 22 months
Total days and hours absent at closure of second school year in upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 22 months
Absence
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 34 months
Total days and hours absent at closure of third school year in upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 34 months
Academic achievement
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 10 months
Average grade at closure of first school year in upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 10 months
Academic achievement
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 22 months
Average grade at closure of second school year in upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 22 months
Academic achievement
Délai: Each participant is assessed after 34 months
Average grade at closure of third school year in upper secondary school
Each participant is assessed after 34 months
Change from baseline Mental Health at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Short form of Symptom Check List (SCL-5), on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Not bothered to Very bothered, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline Mental Health at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Short form of Symptom Check List (SCL-5), on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Not bothered to Very bothered, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Change from baseline Mental Health at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Short form of Symptom Check List (SCL-5), on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Not bothered to Very bothered, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Change in Mental Wellbeing from baseline at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS), on a 5 point Likert scale from None of the time to All of the time, with higher values indicating a better outcome
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline Mental Wellbeing at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS), on a 5 point Likert scale from None of the time to All of the time, with higher values indicating a better outcome
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change from baseline School satisfaction at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6, 18 and 30 months
Three items from the School Satisfaction Scale, a subscale of the Multidimensional Student's Life Satisfaction Scale. 5 point Likert scale from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6, 18 and 30 months
Change from baseline School satisfaction at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Three items from the School Satisfaction Scale, a subscale of the Multidimensional Student's Life Satisfaction Scale. 5 point Likert scale from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Change from baseline School satisfaction at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Three items from the School Satisfaction Scale, a subscale of the Multidimensional Student's Life Satisfaction Scale. 5 point Likert scale from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Change from baseline Loneliness at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Loneliness Scale, 5 point Likert scale from Not at all to To a very high degree with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline Loneliness at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Loneliness Scale, 5 point Likert scale from Not at all to To a very high degree with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Change from baseline Loneliness at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Loneliness Scale, 5 point Likert scale from Not at all to To a very high degree with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change from baseline Social competence at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Wichstrøm Social Competence Scale, a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Describes me very poorly to Describes me very well, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline Social competence at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Wichstrøm Social Competence Scale, a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Describes me very poorly to Describes me very well, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Change from baseline Social competence at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Wichstrøm Social Competence Scale, a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Describes me very poorly to Describes me very well, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Change from baseline Relatedness at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Teacher and Classmate Support Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline Relatedness at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Teacher and Classmate Support Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Change from baseline Relatedness: support at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Teacher and Classmate Support Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Change from baseline Relatedness: peer connection at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Positive Youth Development Connection Scale, on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from Almost never or never true to Always true, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline Peer connection at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Positive Youth Development Connection Scale, on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from Almost never or never true to Always true, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Change from baseline Peer connection at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Positive Youth Development Connection Scale, on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from Almost never or never true to Always true, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Change from baseline Autonomy support at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Ten items from the Learning Climate Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline Autonomy support at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Ten items from the Learning Climate Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Change from baseline Autonomy support at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Ten items from the Learning Climate Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Change from baseline Academic competence at 6 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline Academic competence at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months
Change from baseline Academic competence at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from Completely disagree to Completely agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months
Class climate
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline
Caring Climate Scale, on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline
Change from 6 month Class climate at 18 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at 6 and 18 months
Caring Climate Scale, on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at 6 and 18 months
Change from 6 month Class climate at 30 months
Délai: Based on self-report in survey assessment at 6 and 30 months
Caring Climate Scale, on a 5 point Likert scale, ranging from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Based on self-report in survey assessment at 6 and 30 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Torill B Larsen, PhD, University of Bergen

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 février 2016

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

31 octobre 2019

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

12 février 2020

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

30 novembre 2017

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 décembre 2017

Première publication (Réel)

22 décembre 2017

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

25 mars 2020

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 mars 2020

Dernière vérification

1 mars 2020

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Santé mentale

Essais cliniques sur Dream School Program

3
S'abonner