Comparative Study Matching Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) and Sublay Mesh to Treat Umbilical Hernia
Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Laparoscopic (IPOM) vs. Sublay Mesh Plasty for Umbilical Hernia in Adults
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Niedersachsen
-
Rotenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany, 27356
- Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme) gGmbH
-
-
-
-
-
Basel, Switzerland, 4031
- University Hospital Basel
-
Luzern, Switzerland, 6000
- Luzerner Kantonsspital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- informed consent
- patient age: ≥ 18 years
- elective surgery for umbilical hernia
- hernia diameter ≥ 1cm
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous history of median laparotomy
- navel site infection
- contraindication for general anaesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >IV
- pregnancy
- cirrhosis of the liver (CHILD B and C) and/or ascites
- cytostatic therapy
- incarcerated hernia
- recurrent hernia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair
|
The IPOM technique provides mesh positioning directly into the abdominal cavity onto the defect under laparoscopic control while in sublay position the mesh is placed directly behind des rectus muscle after small incision close to the belly button.
|
|
Active Comparator: sublay mesh repair
|
The IPOM technique provides mesh positioning directly into the abdominal cavity onto the defect under laparoscopic control while in sublay position the mesh is placed directly behind des rectus muscle after small incision close to the belly button.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
early wound complications
Time Frame: 30 days after operation
|
|
30 days after operation
|
|
late wound complications
Time Frame: 1 year after operation
|
|
1 year after operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
complication rate perioperative
Time Frame: intraoperative complications will be recorded immediately after finishing the operation
|
|
intraoperative complications will be recorded immediately after finishing the operation
|
|
duration of operation
Time Frame: the duration will be recorded immediately after finishing the operation
|
measured in minutes according to operations protocol (duration cut - suture)
|
the duration will be recorded immediately after finishing the operation
|
|
hospital stay
Time Frame: will be measured after discharge of the patient
|
measured in days
|
will be measured after discharge of the patient
|
|
umbilical hernia recurrence rate
Time Frame: 30 days
|
the diagnosis of recurrence will be given by the surgeon clinically or due to ultrasound scan
|
30 days
|
|
umbilical hernia recurrence rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
the diagnosis of recurrence will be given by the surgeon clinically or due to ultrasound scan
|
1 year
|
|
umbilical hernia recurrence rate
Time Frame: 3 years
|
the diagnosis of recurrence will be given by the surgeon clinically or due to ultrasound scan
|
3 years
|
|
umbilical hernia recurrence rate
Time Frame: 5 years
|
the diagnosis of recurrence will be given by the surgeon clinically or due to ultrasound scan
|
5 years
|
|
navel site seroma
Time Frame: discharge day
|
the diagnosis of seroma will be given by the surgeon clinically or by ultrasound scan and measured in ccm (height(cm) x width(cm)x length(cm))
|
discharge day
|
|
navel site seroma
Time Frame: after 30 days
|
the diagnosis of seroma will be given by the surgeon clinically or by ultrasound scan and measured in ccm (height(cm) x width(cm)x length(cm))
|
after 30 days
|
|
navel site seroma
Time Frame: after 1 year
|
the diagnosis of seroma will be given by the surgeon clinically or by ultrasound scan and measured in ccm (height(cm) x width(cm)x length(cm))
|
after 1 year
|
|
complication rate postoperative
Time Frame: 30 day
|
|
30 day
|
|
complication rate postoperative
Time Frame: 1 year
|
|
1 year
|
|
complication rate postoperative
Time Frame: 3 years
|
|
3 years
|
|
complication rate postoperative
Time Frame: 5 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
pain score (Visual Analog Scale - VAS)
Time Frame: 24h post operative
|
will be measured by the nurse according to Visual Analog Scale
|
24h post operative
|
|
pain score (Visual Analog Scale - VAS)
Time Frame: 48h post operative
|
will be measured by the nurse according to Visual Analog Scale
|
48h post operative
|
|
pain score (Visual Analog Scale - VAS)
Time Frame: immediately before discharge
|
will be measured by the nurse according to Visual Analog Scale
|
immediately before discharge
|
|
Quality of life (SF-36)
Time Frame: 1 day pre-operative
|
patients will be asked to fulfill validated SF-36 questionnaire
|
1 day pre-operative
|
|
Quality of life (SF-36)
Time Frame: 30 days postoperatively
|
patients will be asked to fulfill validated SF-36 questionnaire
|
30 days postoperatively
|
|
Quality of life (SF-36)
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively
|
patients will be asked to fulfill validated SF-36 questionnaire
|
1 year postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Daniel Oertli, Professor, Departement of General Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Study Director: Oleg Heizmann, MD, Departement of General,- Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme), Germany
- Principal Investigator: Daniel Matz, MD, Departement of General,- Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme), Germany
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Benhidjeb T, Benecke C, Strik MW. [Incisional hernia repair: sublay or intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)?]. Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Sep;133(5):458-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076954. Epub 2008 Oct 15. German.
- Lau H, Patil NG. Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):2016-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9027-7. Epub 2003 Oct 28.
- Mayo WJ. VI. An Operation for the Radical Cure of Umbilical Hernia. Ann Surg. 1901 Aug;34(2):276-80. doi: 10.1097/00000658-190107000-00021. No abstract available.
- Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 10;343(6):392-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430603.
- Venclauskas L, Silanskaite J, Kiudelis M. Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence. Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(11):855-9.
- Hilling DE, Koppert LB, Keijzer R, Stassen LP, Oei IH. Laparoscopic correction of umbilical hernias using a transabdominal preperitoneal approach: results of a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2009 Aug;23(8):1740-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0177-5. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
- Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg. 2009 Aug;96(8):851-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6668.
- Bullinger M. [Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1996 Aug;35(3):XVII-XXVII; quiz XXVII-XXIX. German.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IPOM-46/10
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Umbilical Hernia
-
NCT01183325CompletedUmbilical Hernias | Ventral Hernias
-
NCT04393532Completed
-
NCT07012603CompletedPostoperative Analgesia | External Oblique and Rectus Abdominis Plane | Umbilical Hernia Repair
-
NCT01289093CompletedInguinal Hernia | Incisional Hernia | Umbilical Hernias
-
NCT04687579Not yet recruitingCirrhosis, Umbilical Hernia
-
NCT01398215UnknownVentral Hernia | Umbilical Hernia
-
NCT05994248Withdrawn
Clinical Trials on intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair
-
NCT06367309RecruitingVentral Hernia | Abdominal Wall Defect
-
NCT07401446CompletedHernia | Abdominal Wall Hernia | Ventral Hernia Repair | Synthetic Mesh | Incisional Hernia Repair
-
NCT07140471CompletedVentral Hernia | Incisional Hernia
-
NCT07367321Not yet recruitingOnlay Mesh | Umbilical Hernia Repair
-
NCT05632952RecruitingObesity | Uncomplicated Ventral Incisional Hernia
-
NCT03994588Completed
-
NCT02233569TerminatedHernia, Abdominal | Hernia,Ventral
-
NCT06178965Active, not recruitingIncisional Hernia | Onlay Mesh | Abdominal Wall Component Release