Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Improve Functional Motor Recovery, Affected Arm

March 29, 2017 updated by: University of Oklahoma

Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Functional Motor Recovery in the Affected Arm-Hand in Patients After an Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Control Trial

Overall goal of this study is to determine if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) plus conventional occupational therapy improves functional motor recovery in the affected arm-hand in patients after an acute ischemic stroke compared to sham tDCS plus conventional occupational therapy, and to obtain information to plan a large randomized controlled trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Study design:

Patients Successive admissions to the stroke service of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center with ischemic strokes will participate in this study.

Eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Unilateral, 1st acute stroke event within 4 weeks of admission to an in-patient rehabilitation facility
  2. Ischemic stroke documented clinically and by neuroimaging.
  3. Severe upper limb weakness (MRC grade of 2 or less at the shoulder joint)
  4. Medically stable from a cardio-respiratory stand point so that they can participate in daily therapies.
  5. Depressed patients will be included in the study (psychiatrist referral will be made if deemed necessary).
  6. Aphasic alert patients will be included in the study provided they were able to follow simple directions by verbal or gestural cues and provided with a written informed consent.
  7. Informed consent, from cognitively intact patients (admission Mini Mental Scale Examination [MMSE] greater than or equal to 21). When it is not possible for the patient to provide informed consent or patient is cognitively impaired with MMSE ≤ 20, proxy consent will be obtained from the next of kin (legal authorized representative) according to institutional IRB standards. Informed consent will be obtained by the admitting physicians.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Hemorrhagic strokes
  2. Patient's with an episode post-stroke seizure or history of epilepsy.
  3. Patients medically unstable, demented, or terminally ill (e.g., patients with stroke as a complication of a terminal cancer).
  4. On medications such as botox for spasticity or other medications known to enhance motor recovery such as d-amphetamine,
  5. Stroke patients with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators.
  6. Refusal to provide informed consent

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Oklahoma City VA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Unilateral, 1st acute stroke event within 4 weeks of admission to an in-patient rehabilitation facility
  2. Ischemic stroke documented clinically and by neuroimaging.
  3. Severe upper limb weakness (MRC grade of 2 or less at the shoulder joint)
  4. Medically stable from a cardio-respiratory stand point so that they can participate in daily therapies.
  5. Depressed patients will be included in the study (psychiatrist referral will be made if deemed necessary).
  6. Aphasic alert patients will be included in the study provided they were able to follow simple directions by verbal or gestural cues and provided with a written informed consent.
  7. Informed consent, from cognitively intact patients (admission Mini Mental Scale Examination [MMSE] greater than or equal to 21). When it is not possible for the patient to provide informed consent or patient is cognitively impaired with MMSE ≤ 20, proxy consent will be obtained from the next of kin (legal authorized representative) according to institutional IRB standards. Informed consent will be obtained by the admitting physicians.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hemorrhagic strokes
  2. Patient's with an episode post-stroke seizure or history of epilepsy.
  3. Patients medically unstable, demented, or terminally ill (e.g., patients with stroke as a complication of a terminal cancer).
  4. On medications such as botox for spasticity or other medications known to enhance motor recovery such as d-amphetamine,
  5. Stroke patients with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators.
  6. Refusal to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sham Comparator: t DC stimulation
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS induces slight short-lasting tingling with onset of the stimulation. These sensations usually fade away in seconds. Sham interventions are essential to blind the subject and the assessor in order to obtain unbiased assessment of intervention effects
Device: t DC stimulation
tDCS is a non-invasive, non-painful technique that modulates cortical excitability. tDCS can induce intracerebral current flow that is sufficiently large to achieve changes in cortical excitability. Thus, tDCS can be applied to humans non-invasively and painlessly to induce focal, lasting but reversible shifts of cortical excitability.
Other Names:
  • Sham transcranial DC brain stimulator
Device: tDCStimulation
1 mA of tDCS will be delivered through surface electrodes (25-35 cm2) to the unaffected motor cortex for 30 min prior to a patient's scheduled OT. In the sham group patient will receive stimulation for 30 seconds only.
Other Names:
  • Experimental tDC stimulator
Experimental: tDC stimulation
Actual DC stimulation
Device: t DC stimulation
tDCS is a non-invasive, non-painful technique that modulates cortical excitability. tDCS can induce intracerebral current flow that is sufficiently large to achieve changes in cortical excitability. Thus, tDCS can be applied to humans non-invasively and painlessly to induce focal, lasting but reversible shifts of cortical excitability.
Other Names:
  • Sham transcranial DC brain stimulator
Device: tDCStimulation
1 mA of tDCS will be delivered through surface electrodes (25-35 cm2) to the unaffected motor cortex for 30 min prior to a patient's scheduled OT. In the sham group patient will receive stimulation for 30 seconds only.
Other Names:
  • Experimental tDC stimulator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Functional Independence Measure (TFIM) Change Scores
Time Frame: from baseline to 4-weeks of therapy
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) will measure the degree of disability. The FIM scale is a reliable and valid functional assessment measure widely used in rehabilitation settings. The FIM has 18 items and each item is scored on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 7. A FIM™ item score of seven is categorized as "complete independence," while a score of one is "total assist" (patient performs less than 25% of task). The total FIM score (TFIM) quantifies level of independence and ranges from 18 (lowest) to 126 (highest) level of independence.
from baseline to 4-weeks of therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Change Scores
Time Frame: baseline to after 4-weeks of therapy
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a standardized ordinal scale that measures upper extremity (arm and hand) function. This test assesses the ability to lift various sized objects to a height of 14.75 inches, move cylindrical shaped objects a distance of 14.75 inches, use pinch grasp to lift varying sized objects (such as a ball bearing, and a marble) between the thumb and the 3rd finger, and perform 3 gross upper extremity movements. Each upper extremity is evaluated individually. Score 0=no arm-hand movement and 57=normal
baseline to after 4-weeks of therapy
Discharge Disposition
Time Frame: after 4 weeks of intervention
Patient discharged home or to sub-acute facility
after 4 weeks of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Oklahoma

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
VA Office of Research and Development

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Meheroz H Rabadi, MD, MRCPI, Oklahoma University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 16, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 7, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 14, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1620

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Ischemia

Clinical Trials on t DC stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings