Mechanisms of Improvement With Beta-Blocker Treatment in Heart Failure

September 22, 2025 updated by: Biykem Bozkurt, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
The overall hypothesis of this application is that the improvement in LV ejection performance following treatment with betablockers is due, at least in part, to improvement in intrinsic myocardial contractility.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The immediate specific objectives of this application are two-fold: (1) to determine whether the observed improvement in LV ejection performance is due to alterations in intrinsic cardiac myocardial contractility and (2) to determine whether changes in LV contractile reserve following an infusion of intravenous milrinone can be used to predict a salutary response to beta-blockers. The immediate specific objectives of this proposal will be addressed in the following two Specific Aims: In Specific Aim 1, we will determine whether the observed improvement in LV ejection fraction following treatment with beta-blockers is due to changes in intrinsic myocardial contractility, as opposed to changes in LV remodeling (i.e. reduction in LV volume) or changes in LV loading conditions. Changes in LV function will be evaluated using proven indexes, one an ejection phase index: the relation of end-systolic stress (ESS) to the mean velocity of fiber shortening (VCF), considered a relatively load independent measure of contractility. Changes in LV structure will be evaluated using echocardiography. In Specific Aim 2, we will determine whether the salutary response to beta-blockers can be predicted by measuring "contractile reserve", defined as a change in contractility determined by the relation of the mean velocity of fiber shortening (VCF) to end-systolic stress (ESS) in response to intravenous milrinone infusion at the cardiac catheterization lab prior to the institution of beta-blockade. The response to treatment with beta-blockers will be assessed by measurement of LV ejection fraction and LV end-diastolic volume by echocardiography after 6 months of treatment with beta-blockers, and these measurements will be correlated with the respective changes in contractile reserve measurement at baseline.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
55

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients 18 years of age or older.
  2. Man or nonpregnant women (only women who are postmenopausal, surgically sterile or practicing an acceptable method of contraception)
  3. Patients with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF< 35% and NYHA Class III-IVa heart failure
  4. Patients on standard stable medical therapy with Ace inhibitors (or hydralazine and nitrates or Angiotensin II Receptor blockers if Ace-intolerant), diuretics and or digoxin for at least 1 month prior to enrollment in the study.
  5. Heart failure symptoms have to be present for at least 3 months
  6. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ischemic heart disease documented by cardiac catheterization with any coronary obstructive lesion > 50% stenosis, history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery , percutaneous coronary angioplasty or stenting
  2. Uncorrected primary valvular disease, obstructive or restrictive cardiomyopathy.
  3. Systolic blood pressure >170 or <85 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg; heart rate <50 bpm.
  4. Sick sinus syndrome or advanced heart block (unless treated by a pacemaker), symptomatic or sustained ventricular tachycardia not controlled by antiarrhythmic drugs or an implantable defibrillator
  5. Cor pulmonale, obstructive pulmonary disease requiring oral bronchodilator or steroid therapy
  6. Active malignancy, or a systemic or terminal disease that would limit physical function or survival during the trial
  7. Active and known drug or alcohol dependence or any factors that will interfere with the study conduct or interpretation of results.
  8. Clinically important hepatic or renal disease; or any condition other than heart failure that could limit survival
  9. Platelet count <100 000 mm3 or white blood cell count <3000 mm3, INR (international normalized ratio) >1.7
  10. Current treatment with beta-blocker, beta-agonist, verapamil, chronic cyclic or continuous inotropic therapy, or use of an investigational drug within 30 days of entry into the challenge phase
  11. History of drug sensitivity or adverse reactions to beta-blockers
  12. Unwillingness to cooperate or give written informed consent, pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Load independent measure of contractility: Left ventricular velocity of circumferential shortening to left ventricular end systolic stress ratio
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (VCF) will be derived as = Left Ventricular Fractional shortening / Ejection Time.Left ventricular (LV) end-systolic stress will be calculated as = ([1.35 × P × LV endsysolic diameter]/(4 × LV posterior wall thickness in systole × (1+LV posterior wall thickness in systole /LV endsysolic diameter)))
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic volumes, left ventricular end systolic stress, effective arterial elastance
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Biykem Bozkurt, MD, Michael E.DeBakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 16, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VA-CDA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on carvedilol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings