Adaptative Radiotherapy to Decrease Xerostomia in Oropharynx Carcinoma (ARTIX)

July 26, 2021 updated by: Center Eugene Marquis

Phase III Trial Testing the Benefit of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy With Weekly Replanifications Versus Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy With Only One Planification in Locally Advanced Oropharynx Carcinoma for Decreasing Xerostomia

The Phase III study will include 174 patients with locally advanced oropharynx carcinoma, receiving all arc-IMRT (Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy) (70 Gy) with concomitant systemic therapy. Two arc-IMRT treatment arms will be compared: one "standard" arm based on the use of a single pre-treatment planning and one "experimental" arm (adaptive RT) based on a weekly replanning to spare the salivary glands. The main objective is to increase by 25% the salivary flow (Parafilm) 12 months after RT thanks to adaptive RT, while not decreasing local control. The secondary objectives are to increase the salivary flow (scintigraphy), reduce xerostomia, acute and late toxicities (Eisbruch questionnaire, MDAS-HN, v.4 CTCAE), while maintaining local control (stopping rule of the trial if difference>15%). 174 patients will be included in 6 French centers for 2 years and followed for 2 years. The HPV (Human Papillomavirus) status will be identified and the tumors frozen. A central IMRT QA (Quality Assurance) will be performed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
132

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Albi, France
        • Clinique Claude Bernard
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • Clinique Pasteur - Saint Esprit
      • Caen, France, 14076
        • CRLCC Baclesse
      • Lille, France, 59020
        • CRLCC Oscar Lambret
      • Lyon, France
        • Centre Leon Berard
      • Nice, France, 06189
        • CRLCC Antoine Lacassagne
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • CHU de la milétrie
      • Rennes, France, 35042
        • Centre Eugene Marquis
      • Rouen, France
        • Crlcc Henri Becquerel
      • Strasbourg, France
        • Centre Paul Strauss
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • CHU Tours

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Locally advanced non-metastatic carcinoma of the oropharynx limited to T3 and T4 (whatever the N) and N2-N3 (whatever the T)(AJCC stage III-IV)
  2. Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years
  3. Performance status (WHO ≤ 2)
  4. Renal, hepatic and cardiovascular functions allowing systemic treatment administration
  5. Adapted stomatologic care
  6. Signed informed consent form
  7. Membership or beneficiary of a national insurance scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Both parotids totally included in the target volume
  2. Stages T1 or T2 with positive node disease N1
  3. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  4. Exereses of primitive tumor and/or nodes
  5. History of other cancer within 5 years (except for basocellular epithelioma and cervical)
  6. Previous neck radiotherapy
  7. Platinum salts, 5FluoroUracile (5FU) agents or cetuximab chemotherapy considerations
  8. Unstable diseases (cardiovascular, renal, pulmonary, systemic lupus or sclerodermia)incompatible with study participation
  9. Patient participating in other therapeutic trial with experimental drug, 30 days before the inclusion.
  10. Patient already recruited in another biomedical research ( non interventional study is authorized)
  11. Pregnant or breast feeding patients
  12. Patient deprived of liberty, under tutorship, guardianship or placed under judicial protection
  13. Patient is deemed incapable of giving informed consent
  14. Patients who, for family, social, geographic or psychological reasons, cannot be adequately followed up and/or are incapable of undergoing regular controls.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: standard radiotherapy
single pre-treatment planning before radiotherapy
Experimental: adaptative radiotherapy
adaptive Radiotherapy based on a weekly replanning
Radiation: adaptative radiotherapy
weekly replanning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Salivary flow measure
Time Frame: 12 months after the end of radiotherapy
The salivary flow is measured after stimulation with Parafilm at the time of inclusion and then 12 months after the end of radiotherapy.
12 months after the end of radiotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Xerostomia
Time Frame: From before treatment to 24 months after the end of radiotherapy
salivary flow measured after stimulation before treatment, 6months, 18 months and 24 months after the end of radiotherapy Eisbruch's questionnaire before treatment, at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the end of radiotherapy
From before treatment to 24 months after the end of radiotherapy
Salivary flow
Time Frame: Before treatment and 12 months after the end of radiotherapy
measured by scintigraphy
Before treatment and 12 months after the end of radiotherapy
Local control
Time Frame: 2 years
analysed according stages T and N, HPV status
2 years
Early and late toxicities
Time Frame: From beginning of the radiotherapy up to 2 years after the end of radiotherapy
early toxicity : weekly assessment during radiotherapy until 3 months after the end late toxicity : 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the end of radiotherapy
From beginning of the radiotherapy up to 2 years after the end of radiotherapy
Survival
Time Frame: 2 years
overall and disease free survival
2 years
Head and Neck functionality
Time Frame: Before treatment to 24 months after the end of radiotherapy
MDASI-HN questionnaire before treatment, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the end of radiotherapy
Before treatment to 24 months after the end of radiotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Center Eugene Marquis

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Renaud De Crevoisier, MD, Centre Eugène Marquis - Rennes - France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 8, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2012-RdC-ORL-Th
  • 2012-A00426-37 (Registry Identifier: ANSM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oropharynx Cancer

Clinical Trials on adaptative radiotherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings