Algorithm Guided Treatment Strategies for Bipolar Depression (AGTs-BD)

October 3, 2017 updated by: Yiru FANG M.D., Ph.D., Shanghai Mental Health Center
The purpose of the AGTs-BD study is to compare the treatment outcome and safety profiles between different mood stabilizers combination treatments in the patients with bipolar disorders, currently suffered from depression episode.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The AGTs-BD study is a randomized, open-label, rater-blind, multicenter study, which including an 8-week acute treatment (Phase I), followed by a 24-week recurrence prevention treatment (Phase II), and a 24-week relapse prevention treatment (Phase III). Patients initially enter an up to 4 weeks screening phase to confirm the randomization to whom met DSM-IV criteria of bipolar I or II disorder, currently depressed with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 items (HAM-D) total score ≥17. The protocol was approved by the each sites' appropriate institutional review boards and ethics committees. After screening, patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) lithium monotherapy; (2) lithium plus quetiapine; (3) lithium plus a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) named as Shuganjieyu capsule (SGJY, St. John's wort and acanthopanax senticosus combination). After phase I, patients who met stable remission, defined as HAM-D total score ≤7 and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score ≤10 in two consecutive visit at least 4 weeks, were qualified into phase II and III. Patients remained on the allocated treatment for up to 48 weeks or until treatment failure. The difference between phase II and phase III was that treatment dose could be decreased (within the study ranges) if side-effects became troublesome in phase III, but not for phase II. All patients will be provided with free care (3 visits) by the investigators, for a period of up to 3 months after the end of the study, in order to help them make the transition into routine clinical care.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
360

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Shanghai Mental Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 18 to 65 years old;
  • Han Chinese;
  • Outpatient and inpatient patients;
  • Patients met DSM-IV criteria of bipolar I or II disorder, currently depressed, ascertained with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
  • HAM-D total score≥17, HAM-D item 1 (depressed mood) score≥2, and YMRS total score≤10 at baseline;
  • Written informed consent was given;
  • Junior high school education and above, with enough audio-visual ability to accomplish the visits;
  • Normally resident in one country and had a residential address, able to follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bipolar disorder rapid cycling or mixed episode;
  • Experienced DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders in the 6 months prior to randomization;
  • Severe personality disorder, metal retardation, anorexia/bulimia nervosa;
  • Actively suicide ascertained by research psychiatrist or HAM-D item 3 score≥3(suicidality);
  • Known history of intolerance or hypersensitivity to any of the medications involved in the study, including lithium, quetiapine and SGJY capsule;
  • Female patients who were pregnant, planning to be pregnant or breast feeding;
  • Severe medical or neurological problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Lithium combined with SGAs
SGAs (Second Generation Antipsychotics), quetiapine adjunctive to lithium therapy
Drug: Lithium
Lithium plasma concentration was between 0.6-1.2 mmol/L, dose should be fixed at the end of week 4, and the maximum dosage was judged by the investigator based on the patients' tolerability.
Drug: Quetiapine
Quetiapine adjunctively to lithium therapy, target 400 mg/d with a minimum dose of 200 mg/d. Dose should be fixed at the end of week 4, and the maximum dosage was judged by the investigator based on the patients' tolerability.
Experimental: lithium combined with TCM
TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine), Shuganjieyu capsule adjunctive to lithium therapy.
Drug: Lithium
Lithium plasma concentration was between 0.6-1.2 mmol/L, dose should be fixed at the end of week 4, and the maximum dosage was judged by the investigator based on the patients' tolerability.
Drug: Shuganjieyu capsule
Shuganjieyu capsule adjunctively to lithium therapy, target dose 1440 mg/d.
Other Names:
  • SGJY, St.John's wort and acanthopanax senticosus combination
Active Comparator: Lithium monotherpy
Lithium monotherapy
Drug: Lithium
Lithium plasma concentration was between 0.6-1.2 mmol/L, dose should be fixed at the end of week 4, and the maximum dosage was judged by the investigator based on the patients' tolerability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of HAM-D total score only for the phase I
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
baseline and 8 weeks
Time to new intervention for an emerging mood episode
Time Frame: up to 48 weeks
Time to new intervention for an emerging mood episode is only for Phase II and Phase III, including drug treatment (commencement of a new drug, increase in dose of concurrent drug, restarting of a discontinued drug, or increasing the investigational drug dose in response to an emergent mood episode) or admission to hospital.
up to 48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HAM-D total score ≤7
Time Frame: 8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Remission rate
8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Mean changes from baseline to EOS in HAM-D total score ≥50%
Time Frame: 8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Response rate
8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Mean changes from baseline to EOS in 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Patient Self-Report (QIDS16-SR)
Time Frame: 8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Mean changes from baseline to EOS in Clinical Global Impression scale of Bipolar Disorder-Severity (CGI-BP-S)
Time Frame: 8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Mean changes from baseline to EOS in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: 8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Social function
8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Mean changes from baseline to EOS in 6-item Quality of Life scale (QOL-6)
Time Frame: 8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Social function
8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score ≤10
Time Frame: 8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III
Using YMRS total score to monitor the switching from depression to hypomania and mania
8 weeks for phase I, up to 48 weeks for phase II and III

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Mental Health Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yiru Fang, M.D., Ph.D., Shanghai Mental Health Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 3, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2012BAI01B04-BD
  • 2012BAI01B04 (Other Grant/Funding Number: 2012BAI01B04)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder

Clinical Trials on Lithium

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings