An Open Label, Prospective Study of the Analgesic Efficacy of Oral Xartemis Compared to Generic Oxycodone/APAP( Acetaminophen) in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Post Operative Pain.

April 6, 2018 updated by: Lotus Clinical Research, LLC

A Randomized, Open Label,Prospective Study of the Analgesic Efficacy of Oral Xartemis Compared to Generic Oxycodone/APAP (Acetaminophen) in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Post Operative Pain

The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of Xartemis 15mg/650mg by mouth every 12 hours for the management of acute moderate to severe post operative pain to generic Oxycodone/APAP(acetaminophen) (Percocet) 10mg/650mg by mouth every 6 hours.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
114

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
        • Lotus Clinical Resarch,LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who provide written informed consent prior to enrollment
  • Male or female and 18 years of age or older.

  • Patients who are scheduled to undergo elective general surgery including, but not limited to the following surgical types:

    • Abdominal surgery
    • Orthopedic surgery
    • Spine surgery
    • Genitourinary surgery
  • Patient classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA class I-III).

  • Female subjects are eligible only if all of the following apply:

    • Not pregnant (subjects of child bearing potential must have a negative beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) pregnancy test before surgery);
    • Not lactating;
    • Not planning to become pregnant within the duration of the study;
  • Patients who are expected to have acute pain requiring oral opioid analgesics for at least 48 hours during the post operative period (either inpatient or outpatient).
  • Patient must report a categorical pain rating of moderate to severe on a scale of none, mild, moderate, or severe prior to randomization.
  • Patients who are willing and capable of understanding and cooperating with the requirements of the study.
  • Patients able to understand and communicate in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, could adversely impact the patient's participation, safety, or conduct of the study such as but not limited to a history of severe renal or hepatic impairment, severe active hepatic disease, or any other clinically significant medical condition that may preclude safe study participation
  • Patients who have a known severe allergy or hypersensitivity to opioid analgesics, anesthetics, APAP (acetaminophen.)
  • Patients who have a history of intolerance to short term opioid use.
  • Patients who have abused any prescription medication or alcohol within two years before the start of the study.
  • Patients who require an additional scheduled surgical procedure within 48 hours of the surgery.
  • Patients who have a history of seizures, or are currently taking anticonvulsants.
  • Patients who have dysphagia and/or cannot swallow study medication whole.
  • Patient who is unable to adequately communicate with study staff, properly give informed consent, or otherwise comply with study procedures.
  • Patient who has participated in another clinical trial of an investigational drug or device within 30 days of screening visit or is schedule to receive an investigational product while participating in the study.

Post operative Exclusion Criteria at Randomization:

  • Patients who are not awake, not breathing spontaneously, or have a respiratory insufficiency.
  • Patients who are vomiting and not responsive to standard treatment
  • Patients not able to answer questions and follow commands.
  • Patients who have surgical complications that could compromise safety of the subject or confound the results of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Percocet
Oxycodone/APAP (acetaminophen)
Drug: Percocet
10mg/650mg
Other Names:
  • Oxycodone/APAP(acetaminophen)
Active Comparator: Xartemis
Drug: Xartemis
15mg/650mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non Inferiority
Time Frame: 48 Hours
To demonstrate the non inferiority of Xartemis 15mg/650mg by mouth every 12 hours for the management of acute post operative pain when compared to generic Oxycodone/APAP (acetaminophen) 10mg/650mg by mouth every 6 hours. The statistical comparison of interest will be the patient global assessment of analgesic effect administered at 48 hours after treatment initiation.
48 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Assessment
Time Frame: 120 Hours
To assess patient global assessments at 120 hours after treatment initiation for Xartemis 15mg/650mg by mouth every 12 hours compared to generic Oxycodone/APAP (acetaminophen) 10mg/650mg by mouth every 6 hours.
120 Hours

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healthcare Professional Global Assessment
Time Frame: 48 Hours
To assess healthcare professional global assessments at 48 hours and 120 hours after treatment initiation for Xartemis 15mg/650mg by mouth every 12 hours compared to generic Oxycodone/APAP (acetaminophen) 10mg/650mg by mouth every 6 hours.
48 Hours
Healthcare Professional Global Assessment
Time Frame: 120 Hours
To assess healthcare professional global assessments at 48 hours and 120 hours after treatment initiation for Xartemis 15mg/650mg by mouth every 12 hours compared to generic Oxycodone/APAP (acetaminophen) 10mg/650mg by mouth every 6 hours.
120 Hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lotus Clinical Research, LLC

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Mallinckrodt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LCR-MNK-01C

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Percocet

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings