Long-term Deferiprone Treatment in Patients With Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration (TIRCON-EXT)

August 12, 2020 updated by: ApoPharma

Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of Deferiprone in Patients With Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration (PKAN)

Patients with PKAN will be treated with the iron chelator deferiprone for 18 months. Only patients who have completed the earlier study TIRCON2012V1 (NCT01741532), a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which participants were randomized to receive either deferiprone or placebo for 18 months, are eligible to enroll.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

TIRCON2012V1-EXT is a multi-center, single-arm, open-label study. All patients who completed the earlier study TIRCON2012V1 (NCT01741532) are eligible to take part. In the initial study, patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 18 months of treatment with either the iron chelator deferiprone or placebo, respectively. In this extension study, all participants will receive deferiprone for 18 months. Thus, depending on which product was received earlier, patients will be on deferiprone for a total of either 1.5 years or 3 years. As in the earlier study, assessments will be carried out every six months to look at the safety of the drug and to see if patients are showing any improvement in dystonia and other symptoms of PKAN.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Munich, Germany, 80336
        • Klinikum der Universität München
  • Italy
      • Milan, Italy, 20133
        • Foundation Neurological Institute C. Besta
  • United Kingdom
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 3BZ
        • Newcastle University Institute of Human Genetics
  • United States
    • California
      • Oakland, California, United States, 94609
        • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Completed study TIRCON2012V1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Withdrew from the study TIRCON2012V1 for reasons of safety
  • Plan to participate in another clinical trial at any time from the day of enrolment until 30 days post-treatment in the current study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Deferiprone
All patients will receive deferiprone oral solution.
Drug: Deferiprone oral solution
Deferiprone oral solution at a dosage of up to 15 mg per kilogram of body weight, twice a day
Other Names:
  • DFP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 18 months
Safety and tolerability were assessed based on changes in: frequency of adverse events (AEs), frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs. No statistical comparison between the groups was conducted as all participants received the same study product.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each Study
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study
The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of both the initial study (during which one group received placebo and the other received deferiprone) and the extension study (during which both groups received deferiprone).
Baseline and Month 18 of each study
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study
The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of each study.
Baseline and Month 18 of each study
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across Studies
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study
The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of the study.
Baseline and Month 18 of each study
Proportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD Score
Time Frame: Month 18 of each study
Patients were deemed to be responders if their BAD total score either improved or remained unchanged from baseline, with baseline being the start of each study for the placebo-DFP group and the start of the initial study for the DFP-DFP group
Month 18 of each study
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies
Time Frame: Month 18 of each study
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a global index used to rate the response of a condition to a therapy. Patients were asked at each post-baseline visit to rate their overall condition since the start of the extension study on a 7-point rating scale: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.
Month 18 of each study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ApoPharma

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Klopstock, MD, Klinikum der Universität München
  • Principal Investigator: Nardo Nardocci, MD, Foundation Neurological Institute C. Besta
  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Chinnery, MD, Newcastle University Institute of Human Genetics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 16, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 26, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TIRCON2012V1-EXT
  • 2012-000845-11 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration

Clinical Trials on Deferiprone oral solution

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings