Treatment for Nicotine Addiction in Women

November 20, 2020 updated by: Yale University

COMT Inhibition as a Novel Treatment for Nicotine Addiction in Women

The purpose of this study is to use a medication tolcapone and or placebo to test if the symptoms of nicotine withdrawal lessens , and or changes in smoking urges, and mental reasoning in female smokers over a 72 hour period.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The proposed trail will be use a double-blind, placebo-controlled design to conduct the first randomized controlled trial of the COMT inhibitor, tolcapone, in nicotine dependent women. This study will determine if tolcapone is superior to placebo by attenuation the severity of nicotine withdrawal and smoking urges during short-term abstinence. Withdrawal severity will be assessed by a self-report scale and cognitive assessment, including a sustained-attention task. Smoking urges will be assessed by a self-report scale.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • Veterans Administration Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be 18yrs to 45yr old woman, read and write in English.
  • Must smoke at least 5 or more cigarettes a day
  • FTND score at least 4 or higher
  • A CO reading of 10 or higher during screening
  • Must be in good health as verified by medical history, screening exam, screen laboratory tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excluded if using psychotropic medications, have contraindications to tolcapone use (e.g.. liver problems, allergy to tolcapone, history of no traumatic rhabdomyolysis or hyperpyrexia, confusion possibly related to medication), have other substance use disorder, are pregnant or breast feeding, have a current psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, homicidal or suicidal ideation, have current (past month) substance use disorder, other than nicotine dependence, or are unable to fulfill the scheduled visits and procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Tolcapone
100mg tolcapone three times a day for 7 days then 100mg once a day on day 8
Drug: Sugar Pill
The sugar pill (placebo) will be compared to tolcapone
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Placebo Comparator: Sugar Pill
Sugar pill
Drug: Tolcapone
Tolcapone will be compared to sugar pill
Other Names:
  • Tasmar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Withdrawal Symptoms (MNWS Score)
Time Frame: Baseline (ad libitum baseline and pill day 1 (pre-pill)); Abstinent Period (pill days 6, 7, 8)
The MNWS was the 8 item version, using VAS scales for each item (1-100), and MNWS score calculated as an average of all items (range of possible scores for MWNS at each timepoint was 0-100, with higher MNWS scores at each timepoint indicating more withdrawal symptoms (worse outcome). Timepoints reflect 1.) the baseline (beginning of the trial, not yet receiving any pills, not yet being asked to abstain from smoking; calculated as average of scores from two visits: ad libitum baseline visit and pill day 1 measure which was collected prior to administration of pills) and 2.) the abstinence period (tolcapone or placebo pill days 6-8, during the 60-hr abstinence phase; calculated as average of scores from 3 visits: pill days 6, 7, and 8). Greater increases in scores (increases in withdrawal symptoms) during abstinence period compared to baseline reflects a worse outcome; reduced or stable scores (decreases or a lack of increases in withdrawal symptoms) during the abstinence period compa
Baseline (ad libitum baseline and pill day 1 (pre-pill)); Abstinent Period (pill days 6, 7, 8)
Smoking Urges (BQSU Factor 1)
Time Frame: Baseline (ad libitum baseline and pill day 1 (pre-pill)); Abstinent Period (pill days 6, 7, 8)
The Brief Questionnaire on Smoking Urges (BQSU) is a 10 item scale. Factor 1 reflects the urge to smoke for its rewarding properties. Factor 1 is calculated as the sum of five items (items 1, 3, 6, 7, 10), with each item score ranging from 1-7, so Factor 1 scores range from 5-35. Higher scores reflect higher smoking urges and represent a worse outcome. Timepoints reflect 1.) baseline (beginning of trial, not yet receiving pills, not yet abstaining from smoking; calculated as average of scores from ad libitum baseline visit and pill day 1 which was collected prior to administration of pills) and 2.) abstinence period (pill days 6-8, during 60-hr abstinence phase; calculated as average of scores from pill days 6, 7, and 8). Greater increases in scores (increases in smoking urges) during abstinence period compared to baseline reflects a worse outcome; decreases or a lack of increases in smoking urges during the abstinence period compared to baseline reflects a better outcome.
Baseline (ad libitum baseline and pill day 1 (pre-pill)); Abstinent Period (pill days 6, 7, 8)
Smoking Choice Paradigm: Amount Earned ($)
Time Frame: Pill-Day 8 (end of trial)
The Smoking Choice Paradigm was done once at the end of the trial (Pill Day 8, at the end of the 60 hr abstinence period). Subjects are given forced choice options between 2 puffs of their own-brand cigarette vs. a token with a monetary value, spaced over a 90 minute period. The maximum amount subjects can earn from this task ranges from $0 to $7.50 (10 forced choice opportunities: smoke 2 puffs vs. earn 75 cent at each choice opportunity). Higher earnings reflect choice of the tokens over smoking, so this reflects a better outcome (i.e., reduced smoking choice).
Pill-Day 8 (end of trial)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yale University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
US Department of Veterans Affairs

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Elise DeVito, Ph.D., Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1504015628
  • 1R21DA038253-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nicotine Dependence

Clinical Trials on Sugar Pill

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings