Clinical Study of Treating Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy With Alfacalcidol and Irbesartan

October 9, 2019 updated by: The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-arm Controlled Study of Treating Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy (Stage II-IV) With Alfacalcidol and Irbesartan

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm controlled study, for which a total of 216 patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy (Stage II-IV) will be enrolled. The subjects will be randomized to three groups in 1:1:1 ratio. One group receive Alfacalcidol 0.25ug/day and Irbesartan 150mg/day for 16 consecutive weeks. The second group receive Alfacalcidol 0.25ug/day alone for 16 consecutive weeks. The third group receive Irbesartan 150mg/day alone for 16 consecutive weeks. All subjects will be followed up for 4 weeks after medication is over. A total of 4 visits have been scheduled for this study at week 0, week 8, week 16, week 20.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410000
        • The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
      • Chenzhou, Hunan, China, 423000
        • Hunan Chenzhou NO.1 People's Hospital
      • Yiyang, Hunan, China, 413000
        • Hunan Yiyang Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Chinese subjects, at age 18-65, diagnosed with Type 2 diabetic nephropathy (Stage II-IV) who meet the WHO diagnostic standards of diabetes in 1999. The international Mogensen staging standard for diabetic nephropathy is used. Specifically, in Stage II (normal albuminuria stage), the UAER is normal (<20μg /min or<30mg/24h). In Stage III (early diabetic nephropathy stage), the UAER is 20-200μg /min or 30-300 mg/24h. In Stage IV (clinical or overt diabetic nephropathy stage), the UAER is >200μg/min or urine protein quantitation is >500mg /24h.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Renal damage caused by other causes;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure constantly greater than 140/ 90mmHg);
  • Type 1 Diabetes
  • Any acute and chronic infections;
  • Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)>7.5%;
  • 24h urinary protein quantity>3g, serum albumin<25g /L and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<60 ml/min;
  • Patients who suffered from malignant tumors or any illness that endanger life, such as liver, kidney, heart and lung function insufficiency over the past 5 years;
  • People who have received the gastrointestinal operation, which may affect absorption of Vitamin D;
  • People who have taken such drugs as angiotensin receptor blocker, calcium, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor that affect excretion of urine protein, and who have been allergic to Vitamin D;
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Other candidates that are deemed not suitable by investigators.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Alfacalcidol and Irbesartan
The subjects in this group orally take Alfacalcidol Soft Capsules at 0.25ug/day and Irbesartan Pills at 150mg/day for 16 consecutive weeks.All subjects will be followed up for 4 weeks after medication is over. A total of 4 visits have been scheduled for this study at week 0, week 8, week 16, week 20.
Drug: Irbesartan
Other Names:
  • Irbesartan Pills
Drug: Alfacalcidol
Other Names:
  • Alfacalcidol Soft Capsules
Active Comparator: Irbesartan
The subjects in this group orally take Irbesartan Pills at 150mg/day for 16 consecutive weeks.All subjects will be followed up for 4 weeks after medication is over. A total of 4 visits have been scheduled for this study at week 0, week 8, week 16, week 20.
Drug: Irbesartan
Other Names:
  • Irbesartan Pills
Active Comparator: Alfacalcidol
The subjects in this group orally takeAlfacalcidol Soft Capsules at 0.25ug/day for 16 consecutive weeks.All subjects will be followed up for 4 weeks after medication is over. A total of 4 visits have been scheduled for this study at week 0, week 8, week 16, week 20.
Drug: Alfacalcidol
Other Names:
  • Alfacalcidol Soft Capsules

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in 24h urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) by comparing visits at week 20 with the baseline
Time Frame: at Week 20
at Week 20
Changes in 24h urinary protein quantity by comparing visits at week 20 with the baseline
Time Frame: at Week 20
at Week 20

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by comparing visits at week 20 with the baseline
Time Frame: at Week 20
at Week 20
Changes in the urine levels of IL-6, MCP-1, TGF-β1, MIP-1β, and PTPN2 by comparing visits at week 20 with the baseline.
Time Frame: at Week 20
at Week 20
Changes in serum levels of IL-6, MCP-1, TGF-β1, MIP-1β, and PTPN2 by comparing visits at week 20 with the baseline.
Time Frame: at Week 20
at Week 20
Changes in urinary albumin / creatinine (UACR) of morning urine by comparing visits at week 20 with the baseline
Time Frame: at Week 20
at Week 20

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: during the whole study from week 0 to week 20
during the whole study from week 0 to week 20

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Hao Zhang, Doctor, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 28, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 320.6750.16025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on Irbesartan

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings