Sleep and Pain in Sickle Cell Disease

January 23, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
This is a study testing the effects of behavioral sleep interventions on pain and brain function in sickle cell disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators propose to examine whether changes in sleep alter pain and pain-related outcomes in adults with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). As many as 70% of adults with SCD experience various sleep disturbances. Pain and sleep are inter-related, such that pain disturbs sleep and disturbed sleep amplifies pain and increases risk for developing chronic pain. Pain processing occurs in the central nervous system, where nociceptive input can be inhibited or facilitated and which can undergo both functional and structural plasticity. When plasticity results in amplification of pain, this central sensitization (CS) manifests as hyperalgesia, allodynia, and spreading of pain and is an important treatment target in its own right. A growing literature implicates central sensitization in SCD, and the investigators find a strong association between laboratory-evoked CS and sleep disturbance in SCD. The neural substrates involved in pain modulation are often disrupted in chronic pain, likely due to the demands pain places on cognitive resources, and similar effects are seen with chronic insomnia. It remains unclear whether these changes occur in SCD and if improving sleep improves central modulation of pain. The potential for improved sleep to reduce pain and CS requires additional investigation, particularly given the significance of sleep disturbance as a mutable risk factor. The investigators will conduct a randomized trial in which it will be determined whether improvements in sleep reduce pain and alter brain processing of pain and cognitive stimuli. The aims are to determine whether treatment of sleep improves pain outcomes in SCD and to determine whether treatment of sleep alters functional connectivity of cognitive and pain modulatory networks using brain imaging in SCD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
57

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Jennifer Haythornthwaite, PhD
  • Phone Number: 410-550-7000
  • Email: jhaytho1@jhmi.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of sickle cell hemoglobinopathy (Homozygous sickle cell disease, Hemoglobin SC disease, or Sickle/beta-thalassemia);
  • Adequate facility with English;
  • Stable dosing of medications (if taking) for pain and sleep;
  • Reports symptoms of insomnia;
  • Reports chronic pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment;
  • Unstable psychiatric disorder;
  • Seizure disorder;
  • Positive pregnancy or drug test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Behavioral symptom management
Five sessions working one-on-one with a study interventionist, either in person or by telephone. Includes monitoring of the individual's sleep pattern, feedback and goals for improving sleep and pain management, and addressing cognitive and emotional strategies for managing sleep and pain.
Behavioral: Behavioral symptom management
Individual sessions focused on behavioral and cognitive strategies for managing sleep disturbance, pain, and other symptoms of sickle cell disease
Other: Sickle cell disease management
Five sessions working one-on-one with a study interventionist, either in person or by telephone. Includes monitoring of the individual's sleep pattern, information about sickle cell disease and its management, and information about improving sleep and managing pain.
Other: Sickle cell disease management
Individual sessions focused on understanding and managing sickle cell disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Clinical pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: baseline and 24 weeks
Average of 4 items from the Brief Pain Inventory; each rated on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine); ratings are made of pain right now, typical pain, worst pain, and least pain during the past week. Total sub-score of 0-40 with higher score indicating more pain.
baseline and 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Clinical pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: baseline and 36 weeks
Average of 4 items from the Brief Pain Inventory; each rated on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine); ratings are made of pain right now, typical pain, worst pain, and least pain during the past week. Total sub-score of 0-40 with higher score indicating more pain.
baseline and 36 weeks
Change in Central Sensitization Index
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Index of thermal temporal summation, mechanical temporal summation, and aftersensations
baseline and 12 weeks
Change in functional connectivity/cognitive task
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Functional magnetic resonance imaging, functional connectivity during cognitive testing
baseline and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
University of Maryland

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Claudia Campbell, PhD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00100060
  • R01HL133327 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Behavioral symptom management

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings