The Effectiveness of Low Carbohydrate Diet in Reducing Polypharmacy for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

September 30, 2018 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Low Carbohydrate Diet for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

This study determines whether an educational intervention with a 90 g/day LCD is safe, effective and has good compliance for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Poorly controlled type 2 diabetic men and women, aged between 20 and 80 years, with HbA1c≧ 7.5% (58mmol/mol) in the previous 3 months participated in this randomized controlled 18-month trial at a medical center. Patients were randomly assigned to the interventional group and given a 90g/day low carbohydrate diet (LCD) or the controlled group, which maintained a standard calorie-restricted diet (CRD). All patients received periodic educational intervention and were monitored for weight, body composition, waist girth, hip girth, thigh girth, pre- and post-prandial serum glucose, HbA1c, lipid profile(Cholesterol, Triglyceride. HDL, LDL, sdLDL), renal function, microalbumin/cre, carotid intima-media thickness (IMT),and medication effect score (MES).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
92

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 diabetes diagnosis ≧ 1 year
  • poorly controlled with HbA1c≧ 7.5% in the previous 3 months.
  • aged 20 to 80
  • without or with treatment [ oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) and/or insulin treatment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or lactating women
  • impaired renal function with serum creatinine ≧ 1.5 mg/dl
  • abnormal liver function [alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), ≧ 3 times the normal upper limit) or liver cirrhosis
  • significant heart diseases (unstable angina, unstable heart failure)
  • frequent gout attacks (≧ 3 times/year)
  • participation in other weight loss programs or the use of weight-reducing drugs
  • eating disorders
  • could not complete the questionnaire
  • poor compliance to protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Low carbohydrate diet
Low carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate <=90g/day
Dietary supplement: Low carbohydrate diet
For the LCD group, the daily carbohydrate intake was limited to less than 90g, without any restriction to total energy. The concept of a LCD was introduced and an educational 15 g equivalent carbohydrate food list was provided. The easy conversion method is that 15 g equivalent carbohydrate =1/4 bowel of rice= 1/2 bowel of noodle = 1 slice of toast = 3 soup-spoon of oats = one bowl of fruit =1/2 regular size banana= one glass of milk = 3 dumplings. Less than two equivalent 15g-carbohydrate intakes per meal were advised.
Active Comparator: Calori restricted diet
Traditional diabetic diet
Dietary supplement: Calori restricted diet
For the calori restricted diet group, the target total calorie intake was calculated by multiplying the ideal body weight by 25 kcal/kg for those with a BMI in the range 18.5 to 24, 20 kcal/kg for obese subjects with a BMI > 24 and 30 kcal/day for underweight subjects with a BMI <18.5. The macronutrient percentage was 50-60% for carbohydrate, 1.0-1.2 g/kg for protein and fat ≦30%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The improvement of glycemic control status
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 3 months for 18 months after intervention
The reduction of HbA1c, fasting and 2-h glucose over the 18 months after intervention. The analysis of generalized estimating equation parameters and empirical standard error estimates for the time-group difference over 18 months.
measured at baseline and every 3 months for 18 months after intervention
The reduction of medication effect score (MES)
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 3 months for 18 months after intervention
The MES assessed the overall utilization of hypoglycemic agents. The percentage of the maximum daily dose for each medication was multiplied by an adjustment factor and these products were summed to produce the final MES value. A higher MES value denoted a greater use of medication. The minimum score is 0 and without maximum score.The lower, the better. The reduction of MES over the 18 months after intervention. The analysis of generalized estimating equation parameters and empirical standard error estimates for the time-group difference over 18 months.
measured at baseline and every 3 months for 18 months after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The improvement of lipid profile
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 3 months for 18 months after intervention
The reduction of total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL and the increment of HDL after intervention. The analysis of generalized estimating equation parameters and empirical standard error estimates for the time-group difference over 18 months.
measured at baseline and every 3 months for 18 months after intervention
The improvement of small dense low density lipoprotein (sdLDL)
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 6 months for 18 months after intervention
The reduction of sdLDL after intervention.The analysis of generalized estimating equation parameters and empirical standard error estimates for the time-group difference over 18 months.
measured at baseline and every 6 months for 18 months after intervention
The maintenance of renal function
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 3 months for 18 months after intervention
The change of serum creatinine after intervention. The analysis of generalized estimating equation parameters and empirical standard error estimates for the time-group difference over 18 months.
measured at baseline and every 3 months for 18 months after intervention
The improvement of microalbuminuria.
Time Frame: measured at baseline and 18 month after intervention
The reduction of microalbumin/creatine ratio after intervention. The analysis of generalized estimating equation parameters and empirical standard error estimates for the time-group difference over 18 months.
measured at baseline and 18 month after intervention
The improvement of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT)
Time Frame: measured at baseline and 18 month after intervention
The reduction of carotid IMT after intervention. The analysis of generalized estimating equation parameters and empirical standard error estimates for the time-group difference over 18 months.
measured at baseline and 18 month after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Taiwan University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Chin-Ying Chen, MD, MHSc, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 2, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 28, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201504032RINA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Low carbohydrate diet

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings