Reducing Readmission for Frail Elderly Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure (HFF-ED)

October 12, 2022 updated by: Jonathan Afilalo, Jewish General Hospital

A Prospective Randomized Pilot Trial to Reduce Readmission for Frail Elderly Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

A randomized study designed to determine whether telephone based interventions can prevent return hospital visits for elderly and frail patients with acute symptoms of heart failure. Specifically, the intervention will improve patients ability to monitor and address self care of heart failure at home.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a common illness in Canadian emergency departments (ED). The frail subset of elderly patients with ADHF is challenging to treat, use a large proportion of available resources, and are at higher risk for complications, including readmission to hospital after discharge. The investigators believe that by improving access to follow-up, optimizing self-care, and addressing the various cognitive and physical limitations of frailty, it will be possible to improve quality of life and reduce readmission rates for frail patients with ADHF.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
        • Jewish General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who presented to the ED and who are being discharged with a primary or secondary diagnosis of ADHF
  • Age ≥ 65
  • Frailty, defined as a FRAIL score >=3/5 or Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score >=5/9
  • Informed consent provided by the patient or proxy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant dementia or active delirium
  • Severe frailty, defined as a CFS score >=8/9
  • Prohibitive language barrier
  • Primary address outside of Quebec
  • Patient deemed to be palliative or moribund by treating team

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control Group (Standard Care)
The control group will receive outpatient follow-up, medication advice and lifestyle guidance as prescribed at discharge from the ED or hospital.
Other: Control Group (Standard Care)
For patients randomized to the Control Group (Standard Care), they will receive their follow-up visits, medications, diet and physical activity advice as they normally would. This is the care they would receive even if they were not enrolled in the study
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention Group
The intervention will consist of contacting the patient 5 days post-discharge and arranging definitive outpatient follow-up and providing targeted medical and lifestyle advice based on deficient domains identified at baseline.
Behavioral: Intervention Group
For the intervention arm, a specialized heart failure nurse practitioner will contact the patient or their primary caregiver by telephone within 5 days post-discharge and send them an education packet by mail. During the telephone call, the nurse will (1) confirm the patient's scheduled follow-up appointment in cardiology, (2) provide recommendations for heart failure self-care behaviors that were found to be deficient at baseline. Patients will then be referred to a Geriatrics Assessment Team, who will provide individualized recommendations for frailty domains that were found to be deficient at baseline. The technique used to provide educational recommendations will be motivational interviewing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
All-cause death, hospital readmission, or ED revisit
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of return visits to any ER for any medical issue
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of times enrolled patient visits an emergency department for any medical issue, over the 90 day follow-up period.
30 days
Rate of admission to hospital at 90 days
Time Frame: 90 days
Number of times the patient needs to be admitted to hospital for any medical issue, over the 3 month follow-up period.
90 days
Incidence of adverse effects from medication
Time Frame: 90 days
Number of patients who experience unexpected side effects from their heart failure medications
90 days
Self-Care Index
Time Frame: 90 days
Change in the Self-Care Heart Failure Index from enrollment to follow-up
90 days
Heart Failure Symptom Scale
Time Frame: 90 days
Change in the 12 point Heart Failure Symptom Scale from enrollment to follow-up
90 days
Frailty Index
Time Frame: 90 days
Change in the Frailty Index from enrollment to follow-up
90 days
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 90 days
The number of eligible of patients recruited into the study over a 3 month trial period
90 days
Attrition rate
Time Frame: 90 days
The number of patients enrolled the study who choose to leave the study before completing the follow-up
90 days
Informed consent validation (qualitative)
Time Frame: 90 days
Qualitative feedback from participants regarding the informed consent process
90 days
All-cause death, hospital readmission, or ED revisit
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jewish General Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Afilalo, FRCPC, Associate professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 9, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ADHF-ED-JGH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: CODIM-MBM-17-052
    Information comments: Pilot study protocol
  2. Informed Consent Form
    Information identifier: CODIM-MBM-17-052
    Information comments: Patient consent Caregiver consent French and English available

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Control Group (Standard Care)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings