RIPE vs RIPE Plus N-acetylcysteine in Patients With HIV/TB Co-infection (RIPENACTB)

February 12, 2019 updated by: Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado

An Open Label Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Assess Safety and Tolerability of RIPE vs RIPE Plus N-acetylcysteine in Patients With HIV/Aids and Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Although tuberculosis is a treatable disease, it is currently the infectious disease with the highest mortality in the world. It is estimated that one-third of the world's population is infected. HIV is the main predisposing factor for TB development. The Brazilian Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization recommends that patients should initially be treated orally with RIPE - rifampicin (R), isoniazid (I), pyrazinamide (P) and ethambutol (E). The N-acetylcysteine (NAC) first benefit was reported during the 1960s, when it proved to be an effective mucolytic agent in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Later, a new role arose when investigating its therapeutic potential in acetaminophen intoxication. Cleavage of the acetyl group makes cysteine available for later incorporation into glutathione synthesis, decreased in hepatic injury caused by acetaminophen. This mechanism causes NAC to have an indirect antioxidant effect, which aroused an interest in studying the effect in diseases that occur with oxidative stress. TB and HIV/Aids are also diseases with chronic inflammation. The present study aims to evaluate the effects of NAC as a adjuvant therapy in the treatment of TB. This is a phase II randomized clinical trial in which the safety and tolerability of NAC as adjunctive therapy for TB treatment will be assessed. Fifty-six patients will be randomized into two groups. The first group will receive the standard tuberculosis treatment as recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (RIPE); the second will receive in addition to this treatment 1200mg of NAC per day for two months. In this way, microscopy and culture conversion rate to mycobacteria at 8 weeks, levels of glutathione and biomarkers of immune activation and inflammation in case of TB with or without NAC will be monitored.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

TB and AIDS are also diseases that occur with a chronic inflammatory stimulus, with constant formation of excessive free radicals, leading to cellular and systemic oxidative stress. The effects of NAC in both populations are studied. A study demonstrated that HIV-positive individuals have low levels of glutathione in CD4+ T lymphocytes when compared to healthy controls, these levels being restored after in vivo supplementation with NAC, favoring the production of cytokines involved in Th1 response. They also observed that glutathione depletion in lymphocytes was correlated with increased levels of tumor necrosis factor and free radicals. Some authors suggested that the immune system's inability of HIV-positive individuals (or not) in containing Mycobaterium tuberculosis (Mtb) may be a consequence of low levels of glutathione in macrophages. The same occurred in a model of animals infected with Mtb, suggesting that oxidative stress was partly due to the poor antioxidant defense of the host. NAC supplementation decreases the bacterial load on the spleen and the severity of necrosis in the lung. The balance between oxidative and antioxidant substances plays a critical role in the induction of IL-12 production involved in the Th1 response and suggests that the use of NAC may be useful for better immune control of TB. Additional benefits of NAC in individuals with TB are related to the possible protective effect of hepatic to tuberculostatic drugs and to the direct antimicrobial effect demonstrated in vitro. Some authors suggest that the restoration of glutathione levels reversed the loss of innate immunity functions, pointing to a new mechanism of control of Mtb and a possible complement to antiretroviral treatment. This clinical trial will be undertaken in the Amazonas State (Western Brazilian Amazon), in Manaus, at Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado. It is a prospective, open-label, 2-arm, randomized clinical trial. Twenty-five patients will be enrolled in each treatment arm. A total number of 50 patients should be enrolled. Patients hospitalized in the ICU, in the wards or emergency room of the tertiary unit care will be invited to participate in this study. The assessment schedule will be done in days 1, 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, 120 and 180 (in addition, patient will be asked to come back to the health centre if symptoms occurs at any time). Sputum and blood collection and medical evaluation will be performed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Amazonas
      • Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, 69040000
        • Recruiting
        • Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marcelo C dos Santos, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years;
  • Acceptance of the HIV test;
  • Forecast of hospital stay of more than twenty-four hours;
  • Clinical and laboratory indication of RIPE;
  • Conditions for puncture of venous access;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brazilian indigenous people;
  • People the refuse to perform HIV test;
  • Pregnant women, nursing mothers or pregnant women,
  • Extra pulmonary TB, without pulmonary involvement;
  • Not be able to perform the collection of sputum or tracheal aspirate for microbiological confirmation;
  • No MGIT® positive for Mtb;
  • Resistance to Mtb, detected by professional sensitivity;
  • Individuals under treatment for bronchospasm secondary to bronchial asthma, according to the decision of the assistant team or researcher of the study;
  • Clinical suspicion of gastric or duodenal ulcer, as decided by the assistant team or study investigator; or evidence by upper digestive endoscopy;
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than three times normal;
  • Need to suspend the RIPE treatment, according to the decision of the assistant team or researcher of the study;
  • Lack of adherence to the proposed treatment for more than seven consecutive days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: RIPE (2m) and RI (4m)
The patients enrolled in this arm will receive a treatment regimen with an intensive phase lasting two months of rifampicin 150mg + isoniazid 75mg + pyrazinamide 400mg + ethambutol 275mg (combined fixed dose tablet according to the weight) and a continuation with rifampicin 150mg and isoniazid 75mg (combined fixed dose tablet according to the weight) for 4 months.
Drug: RIPE (2m) and RI (4m)
Rifampicin 150mg + isoniazid 75mg + pyrazinamide 400mg + ethambutol 275mg (oral combined fixed dose tablet according to the weight) for 2 months and a continuation with rifampicin 150mg and isoniazid 75mg (oral combined fixed dose tablet according to the weight) for 4 months
Experimental: RIPE+NAC (2m) and RI (4m)
The patients enrolled in this arm will receive a treatment regimen with an intensive phase lasting two months of rifampicin 150 mg + isoniazid 75 mg + pyrazinamide 400 mg + ethambutol 275mg (combined fixed dose tablet according to the weight) plus N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and a continuation with rifampicin 150mg and isoniazid 75mg (combined fixed dose tablet according to the weight) for 4 months. The NAC is administered by means of effervescent tablet 1200 mg (two sachets of 600 mg) to be diluted in 200ml of water and administered in a 12-hour interval.
Drug: RIPE+NAC (2m) and RI (4m)
Rifampicin 150 mg + isoniazid 75 mg + pyrazinamide 400 mg + ethambutol 275mg (oral combined fixed dose tablet according to the weight) plus oral N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 1200 mg (600mg twice daily) for 2 months and a continuation with rifampicin 150mg and isoniazid 75mg (oral combined fixed dose tablet according to the weight) for 4 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with any biological intolerability or adverse event
Time Frame: 6 months
This evaluation will be done by the physician along all the follow-up of the study
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients in the NAC treatment arm with shorter sputum smear conversion time and culture
Time Frame: Until week 8
This outcome will be monitored by culture of solid (Löwenstein Jensen) and liquid (MGIT) sputum
Until week 8
Number of patients presenting tuberculostatic drug-related hepatotoxicity
Time Frame: 6 months
This outcome will be monitored by hepatic transaminases and bilirubins levels
6 months
Dosage of inflammatory cytokines
Time Frame: 6 months
This outcome will be evaluate immunological assays in the two groups
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marcelo C dos Santos, MD, PhD, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado
  • Principal Investigator: Bruno B Andrade, MD, PhD, Fundação Osvaldo Cruz Bahia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 7, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 12, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CAAE: 60219916.5.0000.0005

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on RIPE (2m) and RI (4m)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings