Silastic Stent Study

September 11, 2017 updated by: Arif Janjua, University of British Columbia

The Effect of Silastic Stenting on Post-Operative Intra-Nasal Re-Mucosalization

Endoscopic skull base surgery is a relatively new procedure that is now a standard of care for surgeries at the base of the skull; however there are no studies that examine the healing process of the nasal lining with the use of silastic (silicone) stents (or splints) that might be placed at the time of surgery. While there is some evidence to suggest that the use of stents improves wound healing, the decision to use a stent or not is currently up to the preference of the surgeon. To investigate the impact of stents on post-surgical healing, the investigators at Vancouver General Hospital will compare patients undergoing trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgeries with septal flap reconstruction with the use of silastic stents to line the septal donor site, and compare their recovery to those who did not receive stents. The investigators hypothesize that the use of silastic stents in endonasal surgery increases the rate of mucosal healing, and better quality mucosal regeneration, and with no effect on the patients experience after surgery. In this randomized control trial the investigators aim to recruit 26 (13 in each arm) study participants. The primary outcome is to determine the effect of silastic stunting on healing of the naso-septal flap donor site. This objective will be achieved by assessment of endoscopic photographs of healing tissue and histologic assessment of healing tissues. The secondary outcome involves questionnaires that measure the patient's subjective nasal symptoms prior to and following endoscopic skull based surgery. Total time commitment for the study participant is about 4 months across 4 study visits (all of which are part of standard of care): the assessment visit, surgery, 4 weeks post-operative follow up visit and 12 week post-operative follow up visit.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients undergoing trans-sphenoidal endoscopic pituitary surgery at their first post-operative appointment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with inflammatory sinus conditions
  • patients having undergone extensive skull base reconstructions
  • patients having received previous radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Silastic Stent
At the time of surgery, if the patient is identified in the "silastic stent" arm, dressing of the septal donor site with silastic stents will be performed after reconstruction has been achieved and the surgeon feels that the surgery proceeded routinely.
Device: Silastic Stent
The silastic stent is a splint made of silicone.
No Intervention: No Stent
At the time of surgery, if the patient is identified in the "no silastic stent" arm, dressing of the septal donor site without the stent will be performed after reconstruction has been achieved and the surgeon feels that the surgery proceeded routinely - this is currently the standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determining the effect of silastic stunting on gross level healing of the naso-septal flap donor sites in two aspects gross level healing and microscopic level of healing.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Visual assessment of endoscopic photographs of healing tissue.
Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Determining the effect of silastic stunting on microscopic level healing of the naso-septal flap donor sites in two aspects gross level healing and microscopic level of healing.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Histologic assessment of healing tissues.
Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Determining the effect of silastic stunting on nasa-septal flap donor sites on the patient's subjective nasal symptoms following endoscopic skull based surgery.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Participants will fill out a quality of life questionnaire called Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22).
Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Determining the effect of silastic stunting on nasa-septal flap donor sites on the patient's subjective post-operative outcomes following endoscopic skull based surgery.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (post-operative follow up at 4 and 12 weeks)
Participants will fill out a post-operative rating scale.
Total time approx. 4 months (post-operative follow up at 4 and 12 weeks)
Physician's evaluation of the effect of silastic stunting on nasa-septal flap donor sites following endoscopic skull based surgery.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (surgery; post-operative follow up at 4 and 12 weeks)
Physician will fill out an outcome measures evaluation scale.
Total time approx. 4 months (surgery; post-operative follow up at 4 and 12 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of British Columbia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Arif Janjua, MD, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 4, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H14-02101

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pituitary Tumour

Clinical Trials on Silastic Stent

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings