Silastic Stent Study

September 11, 2017 updated by: Arif Janjua, University of British Columbia

The Effect of Silastic Stenting on Post-Operative Intra-Nasal Re-Mucosalization

Endoscopic skull base surgery is a relatively new procedure that is now a standard of care for surgeries at the base of the skull; however there are no studies that examine the healing process of the nasal lining with the use of silastic (silicone) stents (or splints) that might be placed at the time of surgery. While there is some evidence to suggest that the use of stents improves wound healing, the decision to use a stent or not is currently up to the preference of the surgeon. To investigate the impact of stents on post-surgical healing, the investigators at Vancouver General Hospital will compare patients undergoing trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgeries with septal flap reconstruction with the use of silastic stents to line the septal donor site, and compare their recovery to those who did not receive stents. The investigators hypothesize that the use of silastic stents in endonasal surgery increases the rate of mucosal healing, and better quality mucosal regeneration, and with no effect on the patients experience after surgery. In this randomized control trial the investigators aim to recruit 26 (13 in each arm) study participants. The primary outcome is to determine the effect of silastic stunting on healing of the naso-septal flap donor site. This objective will be achieved by assessment of endoscopic photographs of healing tissue and histologic assessment of healing tissues. The secondary outcome involves questionnaires that measure the patient's subjective nasal symptoms prior to and following endoscopic skull based surgery. Total time commitment for the study participant is about 4 months across 4 study visits (all of which are part of standard of care): the assessment visit, surgery, 4 weeks post-operative follow up visit and 12 week post-operative follow up visit.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients undergoing trans-sphenoidal endoscopic pituitary surgery at their first post-operative appointment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with inflammatory sinus conditions
  • patients having undergone extensive skull base reconstructions
  • patients having received previous radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Silastic Stent
At the time of surgery, if the patient is identified in the "silastic stent" arm, dressing of the septal donor site with silastic stents will be performed after reconstruction has been achieved and the surgeon feels that the surgery proceeded routinely.
The silastic stent is a splint made of silicone.
No Intervention: No Stent
At the time of surgery, if the patient is identified in the "no silastic stent" arm, dressing of the septal donor site without the stent will be performed after reconstruction has been achieved and the surgeon feels that the surgery proceeded routinely - this is currently the standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determining the effect of silastic stunting on gross level healing of the naso-septal flap donor sites in two aspects gross level healing and microscopic level of healing.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Visual assessment of endoscopic photographs of healing tissue.
Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Determining the effect of silastic stunting on microscopic level healing of the naso-septal flap donor sites in two aspects gross level healing and microscopic level of healing.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Histologic assessment of healing tissues.
Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Determining the effect of silastic stunting on nasa-septal flap donor sites on the patient's subjective nasal symptoms following endoscopic skull based surgery.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Participants will fill out a quality of life questionnaire called Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22).
Total time approx. 4 months (pre-operative assessment; surgery; 4 and 12 weeks post-operative follow up appointments)
Determining the effect of silastic stunting on nasa-septal flap donor sites on the patient's subjective post-operative outcomes following endoscopic skull based surgery.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (post-operative follow up at 4 and 12 weeks)
Participants will fill out a post-operative rating scale.
Total time approx. 4 months (post-operative follow up at 4 and 12 weeks)
Physician's evaluation of the effect of silastic stunting on nasa-septal flap donor sites following endoscopic skull based surgery.
Time Frame: Total time approx. 4 months (surgery; post-operative follow up at 4 and 12 weeks)
Physician will fill out an outcome measures evaluation scale.
Total time approx. 4 months (surgery; post-operative follow up at 4 and 12 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arif Janjua, MD, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pituitary Tumour

Clinical Trials on Silastic Stent

3
Subscribe