Early Initiation of a Strength Training Based Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spine Fusion Improves Core Muscle Strength
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary diagnosis of degenerative, low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis or degenerative disc disease with or without spinal stenosis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous lumbar fusion surgery, degenerative or idiopathic scoliosis, inflammatory disease, and history of malignancy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: The training group
The training group performed rehabilitation program twice per week over 9 weeks.
The group commenced rehabilitation 3 weeks after the surgery.
During the phase one training (week 1 to week 5), the isometric exercises were preformed on the trunk extension, flexion and lateral flexion muscles.
During the phase 2 (week 6 to week 9), the exercises were performed on the strength machines and duration of the exercises were maintained and prolonged to 30 seconds.
The leg adduction and hip extension exercises were added.
The patients were instructed to perform abdominal bracing (IAP) and maintain the neutral position of their lumbar spine before and during the exercises.
|
The training group performed rehabilitation program twice per week over 9 weeks.
The group commenced rehabilitation 3 weeks after the surgery.
During the phase one training (week 1 to week 5), the isometric exercises were preformed on the trunk extension, flexion and lateral flexion muscles.
During the phase 2 (week 6 to week 9), the exercises were performed on the strength machines and duration of the exercises were maintained and prolonged to 30 seconds.
The leg adduction and hip extension exercises were added.
The patients were instructed to perform abdominal bracing (IAP) and maintain the neutral position of their lumbar spine before and during the exercises.
|
|
No Intervention: The control group
The control group followed the hospital's standard protocol.
These do not include exercises or physiotherapy before 3 months after surgery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of isometric trunk muscle strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
The isometric trunk muscle extension, flexion and lateral flexion strength were measured using a strain-gauge dynamometer.
Maximum torque was calculated from the force sensor data (Newton) and the lever as a distance between the middle line of the belt and the iliac crest level (meter).
A higher values represent a better outcome.
The scale range were 48 Nm -830 Nm for extension, 12 Nm - 1010 Nm for flexion, 35 Nm - 680 Nm for lateral flexion right and 16 Nm - 640 Nm for lateral flexion left.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
|
Change of low back pain disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
Self-reported levels of low back pain disability.
The Oswestry Disability Index is presented as a score from 0 to 100 where lower scores represent lower levels of low back pain disability.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of walking distance as measured by the 6-min walking test
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
The walked distance was measured.
A higher values represent a better outcome.
The scale range was from 40m to 800m.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
|
Change the repetition of stand-ups during the Chair stand test.
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
A number of stand-ups in 30 seconds.
A higher values represent a better outcome.
The scale range was from 1 to 29 repetitions.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
|
Change of height as measured by the Standing reach height test.
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
A height which someone can reach.
A higher values represent a better outcome.
The scale range was from 190cm to 236cm.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
|
Change of Intra-abdominal pressure pre-activation pattern.
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
A lateral abdominal force sensor was used to estimate the time delay between the start of the increase in intra-abdominal pressure and the start of the force rise from the force plate (action start).
The initiation of intra-abdominal pressure before starting the action contributed to better performance and result.
The scale range was from -0.7s to 0.7s.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
|
Change of pain disability as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale.
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
Self-reported levels of pain disability.
The Visual Analogue Scale presents back pain intensity with scores from 0 to 10, where 0 = "no problems" and 10 = "maximum problems".
|
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Rok Vengust, Phd, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2257-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070302.
- Christensen FB, Laurberg I, Bunger CE. Importance of the back-cafe concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 1;28(23):2561-9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000097890.96524.A1.
- Nielsen PR, Jorgensen LD, Dahl B, Pedersen T, Tonnesen H. Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Feb;24(2):137-48. doi: 10.1177/0269215509347432.
- Greenwood J, McGregor A, Jones F, Mullane J, Hurley M. Rehabilitation Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):E28-36. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001132.
- Oestergaard LG, Nielsen CV, Bunger CE, Svidt K, Christensen FB. The effect of timing of rehabilitation on physical performance after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study. Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1884-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2717-5. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
- Oestergaard LG, Christensen FB, Nielsen CV, Bunger CE, Fruensgaard S, Sogaard R. Early versus late initiation of rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):1979-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7902c.
- Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1441-5; discussion 1446-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a.
- Cholewicki J, Juluru K, McGill SM. Intra-abdominal pressure mechanism for stabilizing the lumbar spine. J Biomech. 1999 Jan;32(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00129-8.
- Hodges PW, Cresswell AG, Daggfeldt K, Thorstensson A. In vivo measurement of the effect of intra-abdominal pressure on the human spine. J Biomech. 2001 Mar;34(3):347-53. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00206-2.
- Oestergaard LG, Nielsen CV, Bunger CE, Sogaard R, Fruensgaard S, Helmig P, Christensen FB. The effect of early initiation of rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 1;37(21):1803-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825a17ab.
- Abbott AD, Tyni-Lenne R, Hedlund R. Early rehabilitation targeting cognition, behavior, and motor function after lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):848-57. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d1049f.
- Kernc D, Strojnik V, Vengust R. Early initiation of a strength training based rehabilitation after lumbar spine fusion improves core muscle strength: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 19;13(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0853-7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- EarlyRehab-LSF
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spine Fusion
-
NCT03877341Completed
-
NCT03331159CompletedFusion of Spine, Lumbar Region
-
NCT06002217RecruitingFusion of Spine, Lumbar Region
-
NCT01585337UnknownFusion of Spine, Lumbar Region
-
NCT06066879RecruitingCervical Fusion | Fusion of Spine | Lumbar Fusion | Revision Spine Surgery
-
NCT03104816TerminatedFusion of Spine, Lumbar Region
-
NCT05023122CompletedSpinal Fusion | Vitamin D | Lumbar Spine Disease
-
NCT05345249CompletedLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Fusion of Spine | Spinal Fusion | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Disc Disease | Lumbar Spondylosis | Lumbar Spine Disease | Lumbar Radiculitis
-
NCT07193758CompletedLumbar Surgery | Radicular Pain | Fusion of Spine, Lumbar Region | Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy | Radicular Pain Related to Lumbosacral Disc Disease | Lumbar Decompression
Clinical Trials on The training group
-
NCT07238218CompletedIncorporated Dual-task Training | Additional Dual-task Training
-
NCT06898528Active, not recruitingQuality of Life | Physical Activity | Functional Fitness
-
NCT06678009CompletedBlood Flow Restriction
-
NCT04104906Completed
-
NCT07231562Not yet recruiting
-
NCT01812460WithdrawnMuscle Atrophy | COPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
NCT06174467Enrolling by invitationSocial Emotional Learning
-
NCT03828305Completed