Transplantation of Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Via Different Routes

January 26, 2018 updated by: Liu Jing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

Transplantation of Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Via Different Routes for the Treatment of Cerebral Palsy in Children

To preliminarily evaluate the efficacy and safety of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs), and compare the efficacy of UC-MSCs administered through the intravenous, intrathecal, and intranasal routes, in the treatment of cerebral palsy in children.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cerebral palsy refers to a neurological disorder caused by a non-progressive brain injury or malformation that occurs in early childhood. It can result in central motor deficits, developmental retardation, abnormal posture, abnormal muscular strength, abnormal muscle tone and/or dysreflexia. It has a high disability rate. There is currently no effective treatment for cerebral palsy. Conventional treatments for cerebral palsy are often tiresome and expensive and have a slow onset of action. Stem cells have been recently used in the treatment of cerebral palsy. This provides a novel method for the treatment of cerebral palsy. According to the existing clinical studies, neural stem cells, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) are mainly used as the seed cells for the treatment of cerebral palsy. UC-MSCs are the most promising seed cells for the treatment of cerebral palsy because of the advantages including rich sources, ease of harvesting, short doubling time, low immunogenicity, long-time survival post-transplantation, and no ethical issues. UC-MSCs have been widely used to treat Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic brain injury, aplastic anemia, and decompensated liver disease. However,only two studies, and performed only in China, are reported on the treatment of cerebral palsy with UC-MSCs. One from the Hospital 463 of PLA reported 51 patients with cerebral palsy whose symptoms had not been obviously improved after 1 year of rehabilitative treatment. These patients received intrathecal injection of UC-MSCs for three times, once a week, followed by one injection of UC-MSCs via the peripheral vein in the fourth week. Four UC-MSCs injections, once per week, were considered as one course of treatment. Activities of daily living scale score was compared between before and after treatment to evaluate efficacy. Another study is a case report from China. In this report, a combined intravenous and intrathecal injection of UC-MSCs was used to treat cerebral palsy in a 5-year-old child. 28-month follow-up results revealed that the child's gross motor function, immune function, muscle strength, and language ability improved and adverse reactions were not obvious.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Liaoning
      • Dalian, Liaoning, China, 116011
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with hypoxic/ischemic cerebral palsy, primarily including birth asphyxia and premature children
  • Patients with spastic quadriplegia
  • Patients with moderate to severe cerebral palsy, GMFM scores of 2-3
  • Age at 2-18 years
  • Provision of signed informed consent by legal representatives of the child prior to start of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with systemic diseases that likely interfere with the treatment or child's compliance
  • Those complicated by life-threatening diseases of any organ
  • Those with brain deformity
  • Those with uncontrolled epilepsy
  • Those with abnormal behavior or mood disorders
  • Those with allergies especially those who are allergic to blood products
  • Those are infected with infectious diseases
  • Those who had underwent a craniocerebral surgery in other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Control group
Routine rehabilitation treatments
Other: Control group
The control group received routine rehabilitation treatments including acupuncture, massage, Bobath therapy, and Vojat therapy.
Experimental: Intravenous UC-MSCs group
Injection of UC-MSCs via the peripheral vein.
Procedure: UC-MSCs
Injection of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) (at least 1×10^7), once every 2 weeks, one course of treatment including two injections within 4 weeks, a total of two courses of treatment.
Experimental: Intrathecal UC-MSCs group
Injection of UC-MSCs via the intrathecal route.
Procedure: UC-MSCs
Injection of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) (at least 1×10^7), once every 2 weeks, one course of treatment including two injections within 4 weeks, a total of two courses of treatment.
Experimental: Intranasal UC-MSCs group
Injection of UC-MSCs via the nasal route.
Procedure: UC-MSCs
Injection of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) (at least 1×10^7), once every 2 weeks, one course of treatment including two injections within 4 weeks, a total of two courses of treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88 item score
Time Frame: 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.
a 4-point scale that is divided into five categories including lying and rolling, sitting, crawling and kneeling, standing, walking, running, and jumping. A score of 0 indicates that the child does not initiate the task; 1 indicates that the child initiates the task (completes < 10% of the activity); 2 indicates that the child partially completes the task (completes from 10 to 99% of the activity); 3 indicates that the child completes the task (100%). The sum of score of the five categories is used as the evaluation outcome.It is used to evaluate gross motor function.
12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fine Motor Function Measure scale (FMFM) score
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.
To evaluate fine motor function.The scale is divided into 45 items covering visual tracing (7 items), upper extremity range of motion (8 items), grab ability (8 items), operational ability (10 items), and hand-eye coordination (12 items). The FMFM is a 4-point scale with the score range of 0-3. The original total score is 135. The summed score for evaluating fine motor function measure is 0-100.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.
The Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.
To evaluate muscle tone. The MAS score is divided into six grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3 and 4. Passive full ranges of motion exercises are performed by moving the knee and ankle until the patient feel a slight resistance from hamstrings and plantar flexor muscles (soleus muscle and gastrocnemius muscle). The average score is calculated across three repeated measurements.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.
Gesell Development Schedule score
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.
To evaluate neurobehavioral development.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.
Incidence of adverse reactions
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.
Liver and kidney dysfunction, fever, infection, vomiting.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after 2 courses of treatment with UC-MSCs.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 26, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FirstHospitalDalianMU004

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Control group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings