Effects of the Direct Interaction Between Streptococcus Salivarius 24SMBc and Streptococcus Oralis 89a and the Respiratory Epithelium in Children

February 28, 2018 updated by: Roberto Berni Canani, Federico II University

Effects of the Direct Interaction Between Streptococcus Salivarius 24SMBc and Streptococcus Oralis 89a With the Respiratory Epithelium in Children Affected by Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is a pathology of the nasal and conjunctival mucosa induced by Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated inflammation following allergic exposure. This condition represents a global health problem that affects 5 to 20% of the population. As with all allergic diseases, its prevalence in pediatric age has increased over the last 30 years, as shown by the results of the international epidemiological study International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) which shows that the overall prevalence is 8.5 % in children aged 6-7 and 14.6% in children aged 13-14. In Italy, on average, the prevalence stands at 17.6% in the 6-7 year age range and 31.3% in the 13-14 age range, demonstrating a growing trend. The allergic rhinoconjunctivitis undiagnosed and / or not treated properly can negatively affect the school activities and in general the quality of life of children and their parents, as well as having important socio-economic repercussions in terms of medical expenses, school absences and days of work lost by parents. Furthermore, the lack of therapeutic intervention can lead to an increased risk of complications in the medium and long term. Recent advances in the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the inflammation of the airways have led to an improvement of the therapeutic strategies for the management of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: the four cornerstones of the approach to this pathology promoted by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) include allergen removal, patient education, pharmacotherapy and specific immunotherapy. However, there is discordant evidence to support their efficacy in reducing the symptomatology of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with the need to resort to the invasive surgical approach in several cases. Therefore, the use of probiotics, defined as "live micro-organisms which, when administered in adequate quantities, confer an advantage for the organism" can be useful. The mechanisms by which probiotics or their components, for example DNA, proteins and peptides, exert such beneficial effects concern the regulation of the immune system, the antagonist action against potentially pathogenic microorganisms and the quantitative and qualitative modulation of the intestinal microbiota. In fact, recent clinical studies have demonstrated the protective effect of infections of the high respiratory tract in adults and recurrent average otitis in pediatric age of the Streptococcus salivarius 24SMBc and Streptococcus oralis 89a strains administered through nasal spray. These well-characterized probiotics were safe, tolerated and able to positively modulate the composition of the respiratory epithelial microbiota and the function of the immune system.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children aged 6-12 months with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concomitant presence of chronic pathologies,
  • malformations of the respiratory tract and facial cranium,
  • tumors,
  • neurological diseases,
  • metabolic pathologies,
  • cystic fibrosis,
  • immunodeficiencies,
  • history of epistaxis,
  • alteration of coagulation factors,
  • history of apnea,
  • ciliary dyskinesia,
  • treatment with topical drugs nasal steroids and / or oral anti-histaminics or antibiotic treatment in the 3 months prior to enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Streptococcus salivarius 24SMBc + Strept.oralis 89a
spray with Streptococcus salivarius 24SMBc + Strept. oralis 89a
Combination product: Streptococcus salivarius 24SMBc + Strept. oralis 89a
nasal spray based on Streptococcus salivarius 24SMBc + Strept. oralis 89a
Active Comparator: fluticasone + mometasone
spray with fluticasone and mometasone
Combination product: fluticasone + mometasone
nasal spray based on fluticasone + mometasone
Placebo Comparator: placebo
spray with isotonic solution
Other: placebo
nasal spray based on isotonic solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS) from 0 to 15
Time Frame: after 20 days of treatment
Symptoms evaluation was made by the Total 5 Symptoms Score (T5SS), which includes the symptoms of nasal discharge (rhinorrhea), nasal congestion, itchy nose, sneezing, and itchy eyes. All symptoms were graded from 0 (absent) to 3 (very troublesome),with total scores ranging from 0-15.
after 20 days of treatment
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score
Time Frame: after 20 days of treatment

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. Consisting of 19 items, the PSQI measures several different aspects of sleep, offering seven component scores and one composite score. The component scores consist of subjective sleep quality, sleep latency (i.e., how long it takes to fall asleep), sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency (i.e., the percentage of time in bed that one is asleep), sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.

Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the 7 component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.Traditionally, the items from the PSQI have been summed to create a total score to measure overall sleep quality.
after 20 days of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of nasal microbiota composition
Time Frame: after 20 days of treatment
Evaluation of nasal microbiota composition with a nasal brushing and determination of phyla, class, order, family, genus
after 20 days of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federico II University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 274/17

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Allergy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings