Yellow Fever Immune Response at Single Cell Resolution

November 6, 2019 updated by: Brad Rosenberg, Rockefeller University

Single Cell Transcriptomics for Characterizing the Human Immune Response to Yellow Fever Vaccination

The immune system is composed of diverse cell types with different functions that act together in order to defend against infection. This pilot study will test a new technology for studying these many different cell types at very large numbers at the level of individual cells. This method will then be used to identify the cell types and functions important for the immune response to the highly protective yellow fever vaccine, which will improve our understanding of effective vaccine features.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Vaccines have had monumental impact in reducing the mortality and morbidity of infectious disease. However, the underlying immune mechanisms that contribute to their effectiveness are incompletely understood. Transcriptomics (methods that measure the activity of thousands of genes) studies have identified key features of responses to vaccination(see references) and infection(see references). However, these experiments are typically performed on heterogeneous cell mixtures such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC which include certain types of white blood cells) and therefore provide an aggregate measure of gene expression from the many different immune cells and their respective activities in the mixture. Such results can obscure important biological information, particularly in minor subsets of active cells. Establishing a method for immune transcriptomics at single cell resolution would be a highly significant advance and enable more informative and functionally relevant systems immunology studies with commonly used sample types (i.e. PBMC). Applying this high-resolution approach to Yellow Fever Vaccine (YFV), an exceptionally effective vaccine, is likely to identify unappreciated mechanisms that contribute to protective immunity.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • The Rockefeller University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 59 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy Volunteers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female between the ages of 18 and 59 years old
  • Volunteers who have not received a vaccination within 30 days of the YFV and do not anticipate to receive a vaccination within 30 days
  • Volunteers who are seeking the YFV for either travel reasons or occupational risk
  • Volunteers willing to undergo one screening visit, one visit to receive the YFV, and four post-vaccination visits
  • Volunteers without medical conditions who are willing to give blood once for the development of the inDrop technique

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male or females under 18 or over 59 years of age
  • Volunteers who received other vaccination less than 30 days prior to receiving the YFV
  • Volunteers with acute or febrile disease
  • Volunteers unable to return for the post vaccination follow-up visits
  • Volunteers with an allergy to eggs, chicken proteins, gelatin, or other components of the Yellow Fever vaccine
  • Participation in another clinical study of an investigational product currently or within the past 90 days, or expected participation during this study
  • Is pregnant or lactating
  • Volunteers with a history of yellow fever vaccination and/or infection
  • Volunteers with a history of viral hepatitis and/or non-viral liver disease
  • In the opinion of the investigators, the volunteer is unlikely to comply with the study protocol
  • Immunosuppressed individuals as a result of cancer, transplantation, and or primary immunodeficiency
  • Immunosuppressed individuals as a result of medications (such as high-dose systemic corticosteroids, alkylating drugs, antimetabolites, TNF-α inhibitors (e.g., etanercept), IL-1 blocking agents (e.g., anakinra), and other monoclonal antibodies targeting immune cells (e.g.,rituximab, alemtuzumab) and/or radiation
  • Volunteers with thymus disorders (including myasthenia gravis, Di George syndrome, or thymoma) and/or history of thymectomy
  • Individuals infected with HIV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Yellow Fever Vaccine Participant
Healthy participants who receive the Yellow fever vaccine for travel and/or occupational risk will have peripheral blood samples collected longitudinally at time points selected for different immune events post-vaccination according to published studies (Day 0 baseline; Days: 3, 7, 14, and 42).
Drug: Yellow Fever Vaccine
Yellow Fever Vaccine .5 ml
Other Names:
  • YF-Vax

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility and accuracy of inDrop RNA-Seq
Time Frame: up to 42 days post baseline visit
The feasibility and accuracy of inDrop RNA-Seq for distinguishing different cell types will be assessed by comparing (for concordance) cell subset population frequency and distribution values determined by inDrop RNA-seq to cell subset population frequency and distribution values determined by flow cytometry immunophenotyping, the present "gold standard" technique.
up to 42 days post baseline visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Utility of inDrop RNA-Seq
Time Frame: Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 42
The utility of inDrop RNA-Seq for characterizing an immune response will be determined by measuring cell subset frequencies and gene expression profiles at single cell resolution over time following YFV.
Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 42

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rockefeller University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Brad R Rosenberg, MD, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 22, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 5, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BRO-0905
  • 5U19AI111825 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Yellow Fever Vaccine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings