Persistent Multiorgan Failure in Intensive Care Units (PROPOSe)

October 6, 2020 updated by: Evgeny Grigoryev, Research Institute for Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Russia

Persistent Multiorgan Failure in Intensive Care Units: Risk Factors, Prognosis, Outcomes

Multiorgan failure (MOF) as a result of any critical condition is a complex set of immunological and biochemical interactions leading to death in patients who are effectively subjected to primary resuscitation (correction of circulatory hypoxia in trauma and blood loss, restoration of blood circulation after operations with artificial circulation. The frequency of MOF varies depending on the primary diagnosis of a critical patient and, according to a number of authors, is 60% for sepsis, and for severe co-occurring trauma up to 40% of all critical patients. However, if one remembers that the MOF is verified only by clinical scales of assessing the severity of the patient's condition, which presupposes the presence of the already existing pathophysiological mechanisms of MOF as multi-organ dysfunction, it is possible to declare a 100% presence of MOF in all critical patients. The data of Graetz et al (2016) show that none of the available three variants of pathophysiological mechanisms (anomaly of microcirculation, persistent inflammation, immune suppression and catabolism, cellular hibernation and staning) have been unambiguously demonstrated, which also reflected the lack of effectiveness of methods therapy, proposed, based on the pathogenesis options for MOF. A so-called danger-model has a special place in the genesis of the persistence of the MOF, which justifies an active search for distress-associated and pathogen-associated molecular patterns for their objectification and probable elimination. The systemic inflammatory response in patients. included in the study, is not a primary infection. It is also important to determine the role of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) in the genesis of immune suppression as the leading immunological phenotype of MOF in later periods and to evaluate the relationship between DAMP expression and immunosuppressive cells of monocyte origin. The study has a mixed (retro- and prospective) character.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Based on the patient database analysis, by the method of continuous sampling of the cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit for the period 2006-2018, to determine the clinical risk factors for the development of a persistent MOF (MOF + persistent MOF, which lasts more than 7 days and is determined primarily by based on indicators of objective assessment of the patient's condition - the SOFA scale is more than 8 points on the 7th day of the critical care). To form a prognostic model.
  2. By means of biochemical analysis of blood serum and cells, identify biological markers MES specific for distant organs and supplement the prognostic model of persistent MOF. It is planned to detect serum concentrations (1) of surfactant protein A (organ-specific lung marker for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome as manifestations of MOF), (2) intestinal fatty acid binding protein (organ-specific marker of acute intestinal distress (3) S100 protein - a marker of brain damage) with an assessment of prognostic and diagnostic significance with respect to the MOF.
  3. To assess the prognostic and diagnostic significance of serum mitochondrial DNA as one of the variants of the danger-associated molecular pattern.
  4. To characterize the presence of an immunosuppressive phenotype of a critical patient with MOF by examining the expression and serum concentration of: (a) myeloid suppressor cells; (b) T-reg cells expressing CD39; (c) CD62 and CD11b expression on neutrophils on monocytes; (d) soluble sTREM-1, (e) HLA-DR on monocytes. In addition, it will be planned to study the "classic" serum cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 1,6,8,10, HMGB-1).
  5. On the basis of the diagnostic panel obtained, to try to conduct an individualized choice of methods of preventive therapy for MOF. It is proposed to use: (1) cytokine modulation of the systemic inflammatory response by sorption of cytokines on selective sorbents, (2) cytokine modulation by sorption of cytokines on polymethylmethacrylate membranes. It is assumed that in order for these methods to be preventative, they should be used not only in conditions of treatment in the intensive care unit, but also in the operating room at the time of extracorporeal perfusion.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients operated on the heart and trunk vessels under conditions of artificial circulation (coronary artery bypass grafting, prosthetic / cardiac valve repair, operations on the aorta and its branches)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients after planned cardiac surgey
  • informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age less 18 and more then 80 years
  • unplanned cardiac surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Uncomplicated cardiac surgery patients
Patients after schedulled cardiac surgery procedures
Complicated cardiac surgery patients
Patients after schedulled cardiac surgery procedures complicated by multiorgan failure
Device: cytokine adsorbtion during extracorporeal circulation
preventive use of cytokine adsorption and modulation of the cytokine response in the course of artificial circulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) 28 day mortality
Time Frame: 28 day
Mortality in ICU period within 28 day
28 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Free of multiorgan failure (MOF) days
Time Frame: 28 day
Free of MOF period within 28 day
28 day
Mechanical ventilation (MV) - dependent days
Time Frame: 28 day
MV dependens period within 28 day
28 day
Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) dependens
Time Frame: 28 day
Renal Replacement Therapy period within 28 day
28 day
Assosiation of severity of ilness
Time Frame: 28 day
Sequential Organ Failure Assesment
28 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Research Institute for Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Russia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201721

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on cytokine adsorbtion during extracorporeal circulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings