Carbetocin Versus Oral Tranexamic Acid Plus, Buccal Misoprostol on Blood Loss After Vaginal Delivery

August 3, 2020 updated by: hany farouk, Aswan University Hospital

The Effect of Carbetocin Versus Oral Tranexamic Acid Plus, Buccal Misoprostol on Blood Loss After Vaginal Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Excessive bleeding at or after childbirth accounts for about half of all the post-partum maternal deaths in developing countries and is the single most important cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) is the major contributor to maternal mortality worldwide representing at least 25% of the maternal deaths annually. Prevention of PPH has become a global aim to reduce maternal mortality. Uterine atony is the main cause of PPH; therefore, active management of the third stage of labor has emerged as a most actual tool in its prevention. The previous study in Egypt recorded that 88% of deaths from PPH occur within 4 hours of delivery. Tranexamic acid (TA) is an antifibrinolytic agent that blocks the lysine-binding site of plasminogen to fibrin. Misoprostol is effective when given orally, buccal, sublingually, vaginally, or rectally, so it might be used by traditional birth attendants, or self-administered, in cases of home-births occurred without the attendance of health personnel or where women are at most risk for occurrence of severe PPH. So, the current study aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic oral TA plus buccal misoprostol in the prevention of primary PPH after routine active management of the third stage of labor in women at low risk for uterine atony in comparison with carbetocin and buccal misoprostol alone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All women admitted to the reception unit for vaginal delivery were invited to participate in the study. The investigators included women aged (20-35 years) with a singleton pregnancy in a cephalic presentation between 38 and 42 weeks gestation. The participated women have entered the screening phase of the study. This phase included history taking (age, parity, and gestational age) with measurement of weight, temperature, and initial hemoglobin level. The investigators excluded women with medical disorders such as cardiac, hepatic, renal, neurologic disorders thromboembolic disease, blood disorders, diabetes, gestational hypertension, and pre-eclampsia. Women at risk for PPH as grand multipara (parity >5), multiple pregnancies, polyhydramnios, fetal macrosomia, antepartum hemorrhage, prolonged, and obstructed labor were also excluded. Moreover, we excluded women with a scarred uterus or previous instrumental delivery and those suffering from hypersensitivity to TA. women were allocated to one of the three study groups: group I (carbetocin group) received 100 mc carbetocin IV after delivery of the baby, group II (misoprostol group) received 600 mg buccal misoprostol after delivery of the baby, and group III (TA plus misoprostol group) received 1000mg oral TA at the end of the first stage of labor plus 600 mg buccal misoprostol after delivery of the baby. A buccal route, in which the tablets are placed in the cheek for 30 min after which any remnants are swallowed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
360

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Aswan, Egypt, 81528
        • Aswan University
      • Aswan, Egypt, 81528
        • AswanUH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All women admitted to the reception unit for vaginal delivery
  • women aged (20-35 years) with a singleton pregnancy in a cephalic presentation between 38 and 42 weeks gestation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical disorders such as cardiac, hepatic, renal, neurologic disorders thromboembolic disease, blood disorders, diabetes, gestational hypertension, and pre-eclampsia.

-Women at risk for PPH as grand multipara (parity >5), multiple pregnancies, polyhydramnios, fetal macrosomia, antepartum hemorrhage, prolonged, and obstructed labor were also excluded.-

  • Moreover, we excluded women with a scarred uterus or previous instrumental delivery and those suffering from hypersensitivity to TA.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: carbetocin
Carbetocin 100 microgram will be applied intravenously in a short infusion over about a minute
Drug: carbetocin
Carbetocin 100 microgram will be applied intravenously in a short infusion over about a minute
Other Names:
  • Active Comparator
EXPERIMENTAL: Tranexamic acid plus misoprostol
1000mg oral TA at the end of the first stage of labor plus 600 mg buccal misoprostol after delivery of the baby. A buccal route, in which the tablets are placed in the cheek for 30 min after which any remnants are swallowed.
Drug: Tranexamic acid plus misoprostol
1000mg oral TA at the end of the first stage of labor plus 600 mg buccal misoprostol after delivery of the baby. A buccal route, in which the tablets are placed in the cheek for 30 min after which any remnants are swallowed.
Other Names:
  • active comparator
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: misoprostol
600 mg buccal misoprostol after delivery of the baby. A buccal route, in which the tablets are placed in the cheek for 30 min after which any remnants are swallowed.
Drug: misoprostol
600 mg buccal misoprostol after delivery of the baby. A buccal route, in which the tablets are placed in the cheek for 30 min after which any remnants are swallowed.
Other Names:
  • active comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difference in the mean blood loss at 4 h postpartum between the three groups
Time Frame: 4 hours post delivery
measure blood loss by direct and gravimetric methods
4 hours post delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difference in hemoglobin level
Time Frame: 24 hours postdelivery
hemoglobin level pre delivery and 24 hours post delivery
24 hours postdelivery
the need for additional uterotonics
Time Frame: ist 24 hours postoperative
the need of additional oxytocin or misoprostol
ist 24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Aswan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • aswu/293/9/18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postpartum Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on carbetocin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings