Low-Level Laser Therapy and Flapless Corticopuncture Effect on Accelerating Six Maxillary Anterior Teeth Retraction
Evaluation of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Flapless Corticopuncture Effect on Accelerating Implant-Supported En-Masse Retraction of the Six Maxillary Anterior Teeth (Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient age between (18 - 24) years.
Class II Division 1 malocclusion that indicates extraction of two maxillary first premolars with the following parameters:
ANB: 5 to 10 degrees. Overjet: 5 to 10 mm. Growth Pattern: normal or slightly vertical.
- All upper teeth are existed (Except for third molars).
- Mild to moderate crowding (3 mm or less).
- Patient dose not undergo any medical treatment that interfere with orthodontic tooth movement (Cortisone, NSAIDs, …).
- Good oral hygiene (Plaque index < 1).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any medical condition affecting orthodontic tooth movement.
- Poor oral hygiene (Plaque index > 1).
- Patient did not undergo previous orthodontic treatment.
- Patient lack of commitment toward follow-up appointments.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)
In the LLLT group, a low-level laser with wavelength of 808 nm, output of 250 mW, energy of 4 Joules per point and application time of 16 seconds per point will be applied on each tooth of the six maxillary anterior teeth according to this protocol: the root will be divided theoretically into 2 halves; gingival and cervical, and laser will be applied in the center of each half from both buccal and palatal sides which means 4 application points and a total energy of 16 Joules per tooth.
|
LLLT will be applied in this group
|
|
Experimental: Flapless Corticopuncture
In the flapless corticopuncture group, 3 interdental punctures located between the roots of the six maxillary anterior teeth from both the buccal and palatal sides, will be done using a 1-mm diameter round surgical Tungsten bur with 1 mm depth and 1.5 mm space between each puncture.
These punctures start 2 mm from the free gingiva.
Besides, an additional 2 parallel set of punctures with the same dimensions of the interdental ones will be done in the extraction sockets from both the buccal and palatal sides.
|
Small holes in the cortical bone will be achieved using 1-mm diameter round surgical Tungsten bur
|
|
Experimental: Control
Patients in control group will undergo typical orthodontic treatment only with no LLLT or flapless corticopuncture application.
|
Typical orthodontic treatment with no LLLT or flapless corticopuncture
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of en-masse retraction of the six maxillary anterior teeth
Time Frame: The months required to complete the retraction procedure will be recorded, which is expected to be occur within four months
|
Assessment will be performed by calculating the time required from the beginning of the six maxillary anterior teeth retraction till the completion of this procedure
|
The months required to complete the retraction procedure will be recorded, which is expected to be occur within four months
|
|
Rate of en-masse retraction of the six maxillary anterior teeth
Time Frame: The calculation of the rate of retraction will be done once the retraction procedure has finished which is expected to occur within four months
|
Assessment will be performed on study models by dividing the distance that the six maxillary anterior teeth moved during retraction to the time required to retract them to their ideal positions.
|
The calculation of the rate of retraction will be done once the retraction procedure has finished which is expected to occur within four months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maxillary first molar anchorage loss
Time Frame: This outcome will be measured one day before upper incisors' retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
|
Assessment will be performed on study casts by calculating the amount of mesial drifting of the maxillary molar (if any) in millimeters before and after retraction
|
This outcome will be measured one day before upper incisors' retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
|
|
Root resorption
Time Frame: A CBCT image will be taken one day before the six maxillary incisors retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
|
Assessment will be performed by subtracting the root length of each maxillary anterior tooth after retraction from its length before starting retraction procedure.
|
A CBCT image will be taken one day before the six maxillary incisors retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
|
|
Changes in the gingival indices
Time Frame: This outcome will be measured one day before the six maxillary incisors retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
|
Assessment will be performed clinically using the WHO probe
|
This outcome will be measured one day before the six maxillary incisors retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
|
|
Change in tooth vitality (the response of the pulp tissue toward external stimuli)
Time Frame: This outcome will be measured one day before the six maxillary anterior teeth retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
|
Tooth vitality will be evaluated for each tooth of the six maxillary anterior teeth using Ethyl Chloride applied by a cotton roll on each tooth, which will indicate negative response (no vitality) or positive response (vital pulp)
|
This outcome will be measured one day before the six maxillary anterior teeth retraction initiation (T0) and immediately after the completion of retraction (T1) which is expected to occur in 4 months
|
|
Changes in the levels of pain and discomfort
Time Frame: These levels will be assessed at: one day, one week, two weeks, and four weeks following the intervention
|
Assessment will be performed using questionnaires that include Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for each question, the scale has a minimum scale of 0 (no pain or discomfort) and a maximum scale of 100 (maximum pain or discomfort).
|
These levels will be assessed at: one day, one week, two weeks, and four weeks following the intervention
|
|
Change in the Oral Health Related Quality of Life associated with anterior teeth retraction.
Time Frame: The OHIP-14 will be assessed immediately after application, after 1, 7, 14, and 28 days of the six maxillary anterior teeth retraction initiation
|
Assessment will be performed using the OHIP-14 questionnaire; which is a questionnaire that include 14 questions regarding different aspects of problems that might be associated with retraction (discomfort, stress, chewing difficulties, ...). the patient could choose the answer from a five-point Likert scale (Never, Hardly ever, Occasionally, Fairly often, Very often)
|
The OHIP-14 will be assessed immediately after application, after 1, 7, 14, and 28 days of the six maxillary anterior teeth retraction initiation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mohammad Moaffak A. AlSayed Hasan, DDS, Msc Ortho, PhD Student, PhD Student, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics - Faculty of Dental Medicine - Damascus University - Damascus - Syrian Arab Republic
- Study Chair: Mowaffak Ajaj, DDS, Msc Ortho, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics - Faculty of Dental Medicine - Damascus University - Damascus - Syrian Arab Republic
- Study Chair: Omar Hamadah, DDS, Msc, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine - Faculty of Dental Medicine - Damascus University - Damascus - Syrian Arab Republic
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Doshi-Mehta G, Bhad-Patil WA. Efficacy of low-intensity laser therapy in reducing treatment time and orthodontic pain: a clinical investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Mar;141(3):289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.09.009.
- AlSayed Hasan MMA, Sultan K, Hamadah O. Low-level laser therapy effectiveness in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2017 Jul;87(4):499-504. doi: 10.2319/062716-503.1. Epub 2016 Nov 21. Erratum In: Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):125.
- Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
- Hoogeveen EJ, Jansma J, Ren Y. Surgically facilitated orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Apr;145(4 Suppl):S51-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.11.019.
- Tuncer NI, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Oduncuoglu BF, Gocmen JS, Kantarci A. Efficiency of piezosurgery technique in miniscrew supported en-masse retraction: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2017 Nov 30;39(6):586-594. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx015.
- Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0146-9. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
- Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, Corpodian C, Barrera LM, Alansari S, Khoo E, Teixeira C. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UDDS-Ortho-04-2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1
-
NCT04743700UnknownAngle Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion
-
NCT07405905Recruiting
-
NCT07442825CompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1
-
NCT07259720CompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1
-
NCT07466641RecruitingBimaxillary Protrusion | Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT07243509CompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION
-
NCT07162753RecruitingClass II Div 1 Malocclusion | Class III Malocclusion | Class II Division 2 Malocclusion | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT07404696Not yet recruitingClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1 | Overjet
-
NCT02549950UnknownMalocclusion, Angle Class I | Malocclusion; Angle Class II Division 1
-
NCT05610150CompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1
Clinical Trials on Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)
-
NCT02709499Unknown
-
NCT02688426Unknown
-
NCT07422272RecruitingAcute Pain | Pain Threshold | Low-level Laser Therapy | Pain Tolerance | LLLT vs Sham
-
NCT02003599CompletedBreast Neoplasms | Radiotherapy; Adverse Effect, Dermatitis or Eczema
-
NCT04532476CompletedPain Relief Caused by Placing Orthodontic Separators
-
NCT01417637UnknownMyofacial Pain Syndrome
-
NCT07190950RecruitingLow Level Laser Therapy | Third Molars Extraction | Bone Healing
-
NCT04230096CompletedPain | Periodontitis | Gingivitis | Tooth Migration