Semi-inmersive Virtual Reality on Upper Limb in Multiple Sclerosis

June 20, 2023 updated by: Josue Fernandez Carnero, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Effects of a Semi-inmersive Virtual Reality Training Program on Muscle Strength, Coordination, Fatigue, Functionality and Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Video games based on VR technology are emerging as valid tools used in neurorehabilitation for patients with neurological disorders, and as a low cost and easily accepted adjunct to traditional therapy. Standard games such as the Nintendo Wii, Playstation Move and Kinect plus XBOX 360 have been used in EM rehabilitation. However, often these are either too difficult for patients or the games progress too quickly, failing to provide impairment-focused training or specifically address patients' needs [10]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop specific serious games for EM patients. Serious games are defined as games designed for a primary purpose other than that of pure entertainment, and which promote learning and behavior changes for EM patients. In this context, gesture caption devices (such as MYO, LEAP or Joy Con´s Nintendo Switch), which uses a sensor that captures the movement of the patient's forearms and hands are really interesting in rehabilitation contexts. This generates a virtual image of the upper limbs on a computer screen and the patient is prompted to perform movements according to the functional task proposed. This system presents important advantages namely thanks to its portability, ease of use, commercial availability, low cost and non-invasive nature. However, evidence is lacking that supports the therapeutic use of semi-inmersive VR technology in the treatment of upper limb (UL) motor disorders in EM.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, 28922
        • Roberto Cano de la Cuerda

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of MS according to McDonald's criteria.
  • Assessment on the Kurtzke Scale of the State of Multiple Sclerosis Disability (EDSS) with a score between 1.0 and 7.5.
  • Stable medical treatment for at least six months prior to the intervention.
  • Muscle tone in the upper extremities not greater than 2 points (moderate hypertonia, increased muscle tone during most of the arc of movement, but the affected part can easily be moved passively) on the modified Ashworth Scale.
  • Score less than or equal to 4 points in the section ¨Piramidal Function¨ of the functional scale of the EDSS.
  • Absence of cognitive impairment, with the ability to understand the instructions and obtain a score equal to or greater than 24 in the Minimental Test.
  • Score equal to or less than 2 points in the section ¨Functions Mental¨ of the EDSS.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of another neurological disease or musculoskeletal disorder other than MS.
  • Diagnosis of any cardiovascular, respiratory or metabolic disease.
  • Other conditions that may interfere with this study, having suffered an exacerbation or hospitalization in the last 3 months before starting the protocol of assessment, or during the therapeutic intervention process.
  • Having received a steroid cycle, intravenously or orally, 6 months before the start of the assessment protocol and within the intervention period of study duration.
  • Having received treatment with botulinum toxin in the six months prior to the start of the study.
  • Presence of uncorrected visual disturbances through eye devices.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional therapy
Conventional Physical therapy for the upper limb
Conventional Physical therapy for the upper limb
Experimental: semi-inmersive VR technology plus conventional therapy
Conventional Physical therapy for the upper limb plus semi-inmersive VR technology
Conventional Physical therapy for the upper limb plus Semi-inversive tech

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Jamar
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Hand-held dynamometer: it is an instrument to measure the maximumisometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. It consists of a sealed hydraulic system with adjustable hand spacing that measures hand grip force. The strength reading can be viewed as pounds or kilograms.Thedynamometer is used for testing the hand grip force and for tracking the grip strength improvements during rehabilitation.
8 weeks
Box and blocks
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Coordination test: to measure unilateral gross manual dexterity in both the less and more affected side. The Box and blocks consists of moving the maximum number of blocks from one compartment of a box to another, one by one, within one minute. The Box and blocks is a quick, simple, and reliable measurement of manual dexterity. Its administration procedure is standardized and its validity has been shown in elderly subjects with upper limb disability
8 weeks
The Purdue Pegboard Test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Motricity: to assess coordination, speed of movement and fine motor dexterity. The The Purdue Pegboard Test features a board with two columns with 25 holes each and a specific number of pins, washers and collars placed in four containers across the top of the board. The test consists of inserting as many pins as possible in three distinct phases, with a time limit of 30 s for each. First, the test is performed with the less affected side, then with the more affected side, then with both hands at the same time and, finally, an assembly test is performed (60 s). The number of pins inserted is subsequently recorded.
8 weeks
Nine Hole Peg Test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Motricity: It is a hand function test, which consists of a plastic peg board (25.0 cm × 12.7 cm × 2.3 cm) with nine holes (2.54 cm between the holes) and nine pegs (3.2 cm long, 0.64 cm wide). The participant had to put the nine pegs in the peg board as fast as possible, one at the time with one hand only, and remove them again. The test was performed two times per hand, with the non-affected hand first. The time it takes to fulfill the second trial with the more-affected hand was used for the analysis
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: after 8 weeks of treatment
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate the satisfaction of health service users for both groups. This is a self-administered post-treatment questionnaire, comprising eight items which evaluate the level of satisfaction regarding the care and quality of the service received and the level of fulfillment of the patient's expectations regarding the treatment administered. The total score of the questionnaire is 32 points, with higher values meaning higher satisfaction with the treatment received
after 8 weeks of treatment
Adherence
Time Frame: after 8 weeks of treatment
The attendance rate (%) for therapy sessions (compliance) will be registered
after 8 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Virtual Arms-EM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Conventional therapy

Search Similar Trials