Evaluating Cascade Communication Methods (ECHO)

April 15, 2026 updated by: University of Pennsylvania

ECHO: Evaluating Cascade Communication Methods

Hereditary cancer programs face challenges with respect to effective communication of genetic test results within families and uptake of genetic testing by relatives. This study aims to determine if a "disclosure toolkit" provided to the index participant (carrier of cancer risk gene mutation) contributes to sharing genetic test results with relatives, if there are preferred disclosure methods, and whether toolkit use contributes towards at-risk relatives pursuing genetic testing.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The identification of a single individual with a highly penetrant cancer susceptibility gene mutation can have far reaching implications for at-risk relatives in that other family members can engage in highly informative and predictive genetic testing for cancer predisposition. Family members who carry the familial cancer gene mutation are able to receive personalized cancer risk management based upon their positive test result, while those family members who test negative can generally be downgraded to follow cancer screening guidelines for the general population, barring additional familial or personal risk factors for developing cancer. Though crucial for stratifying and managing risks for relatives, familial testing, otherwise known as cascade testing, is not always successfully implemented within and across families. On a clinical basis the proband, also known as the index mutation carrier, is generally encouraged to share results with family members in order to promote their engagement in genetic counseling and testing. Despite the provision of results and a tailored letter for family members, hereditary cancer programs routinely face challenges with respect to communication of results within families and uptake of testing by relatives. Research on family communication and cascade testing substantiates this experience as previous studies have demonstrated suboptimal uptake of cascade testing in families, despite its importance for defining and managing cancer risk (Barsevicket al,2008; Daly et al, 2016). The purpose of our research study is to determine whether the provision of multiple communication tools and platforms will improve communication between probands and at-risk relatives, and if so, which communication method is the most useful to probands in communicating their results and to relatives in coming to a decision regarding genetic counseling and testing. Through the study, probands will be provided with a three-part toolkit that includes a letter, website, and a chatbot known as "GIA" (for"Genetic Information Assistant"). Though the challenges/barriers of cascade testing are well-documented, there are scant reports of follow-up with relatives. Our study allows direct contact with family members (by way of proband consent) to assess motivations and barriers to genetic testing by family members.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
52

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Abramson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be ascertained through the clinical genetics programs at Penn Medicine (Mariann and Robert MacDonald Cancer Risk Evaluation Program, "CREP," the Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk Evaluation Program, "GI CREP," and Penn Telegenetics). Participants will be clinical patients identified to be a carrier of a high risk cancer predisposition gene mutation as determined by the study team. Participants will have been through a formal pre-test genetic counseling consultation and will be approached for study enrollment at time of result disclosure (either telephone or in-person) - also known as the "post-test" visit. Disclosure of genetic test results will be facilitated by a participating genetic counselor.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age and older
  • Proband must be carrier of a high risk cancer predisposition gene
  • Relative must be established relative of respective proband participant and deemed "at-risk" for familial gene mutation and eligible genetic testing candidate as per study team determination
  • Participants must be able to understand and read English
  • Participants must be able to provide informed verbal or written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years of age
  • Individuals who are mutation negative for high risk cancer predisposition genes
  • Individuals who are carriers of a variant of uncertain significance in any gene
  • Individuals who test positive for more than 1 high risk cancer predisposition gene
  • Individuals who cannot speak and read English
  • Individuals who do not have any at-risk relatives (eligible for familial gene mutation testing) as per study team determination
  • Major psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment that in the judgement of the study investigators or study staff would preclude study participation
  • Any patients who are unable to comply with the study procedures as determined by the study investigators or study staff
  • No available family members for cascade opportunity (adoption, estrangement, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of Toolkit use on sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives
Time Frame: 1 year
Determine if a "Disclosure Toolkit" contributes to participant sharing of genetic test result with at-risk relatives, and if so, which method is most useful for aiding in communication of results and decisions to undergo genetic counseling and testing.
1 year
Impact of Toolkit use on at-risk relatives pursuing genetic testing
Time Frame: 1 year
Determine if a "Disclosure Toolkit" impacts the rate of genetic testing by at-risk relatives in comparison to rates of genetic testing by relatives consistently reported in the literature.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barriers to sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives
Time Frame: 1 year
Assess possible barriers and/or unforeseen challenges that inhibit optimal sharing of genetic test results with at-risk relatives.
1 year
Barriers inhibiting uptake of genetic testing by informed at-risk relatives
Time Frame: 1 year
Assess possible barriers and/or unforeseen challenges that inhibit optimal uptake of genetic testing by informed at-risk relatives.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pennsylvania

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Susan M Domchek, MD, Penn Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 833635

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on BRCA1 Mutation

Clinical Trials on Disclosure Toolkit

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings