Regenerative Potential of a Collagen Membrane Associated or Not to Bovine Bone in Class II Furcation Defects. (RPPCMABBICFD)

June 24, 2020 updated by: Sergio Luis Scombatti de Souza, University of Sao Paulo

Regenerative Potential of a Collagen Membrane Associated or Not to Bovine Bone in Class II Furcation Defects - A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Periodontal disease is an infectious-inflammatory disease that accommodates the supporting and supporting tissues of the teeth, with the formation of periodontal pockets, and this destruction can generate anatomical defects in the region of bifurcation. Treatment of these lesions is a challenge for the clinician, as this area has limited access to bacterial biofilm and calculus. The surgical regenerative therapy using bone grafts and membrane may be a viable option in cases of class II furcation defects. In this context, the objective of this case series is to evaluate tomographically and clinically the treatment of class II furcation defects using an absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide® Perio) associated or not with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen matrix (Bio-Oss® Collagen).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Periodontal disease is an infectious-inflammatory disease that accommodates the supporting and supporting tissues of the teeth, with the formation of periodontal pockets, and this destruction can generate anatomical defects in the region of bifurcation. Treatment of these lesions is a challenge for the clinician, as this area has limited access to bacterial biofilm and calculus. The surgical regenerative therapy using bone grafts and membrane may be a viable option in cases of class II furcation defects. In this context, the objective of this case series is to evaluate tomographically and clinically the treatment of class II furcation defects using an absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide® Perio) associated or not with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen matrix (Bio-Oss® Collagen). In a parallel design, 22 patients with mandibular class II furcation defects were recruited. Each defect was randomly assigned to the control group (CG - Bio-Gide® Perio, n=11) or test group (TG - Bio-Oss® Collagen + Bio-Gide® Perio, n=11). Tomographic and clinical evaluations were conducted at baseline and 12 months post-surgery. Clinical measurements of clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing depth (PD). Tomographical measurements of horizontal defect dimension (HDD) and vertical defect dimension (VDD) were recorded. In sequence, guided tissue regeneration surgeries were conducted: Then, bone defect were debrided, , the collagen membranes (BioGide Perio®) were trimmed to cover the osseous defects and extended 3 mm apically and laterally to the adjacent bone and sutured with absorbable suture. In the Test Group, the defects were completely filled with bovine bone + porcine collagen (BioOss Collagen®). The flaps were then coronally positioned until completely covering the membranes and sutured. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate normality of the data, and showed a normal distribution. Then, t-Test was selected for inter-group and intragroup comparisons. Trans-surgical measurements were evaluated at Baseline. The other clinical and tomographic parameters were evaluated at Baseline and 12 months. For all analyzes, p <0.05 was considered.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Sao Paulo
      • São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 14040-904
        • University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subjects with a diagnosis of periodontitis, Stage III and Grade A (according to the 2018 international classification criteria);
  • presence of one mandibular molar with class II buccal furcation defect;
  • non-smokers;
  • plaque index <20%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients that presented systemic diseases;
  • patients that had taken antibiotics in the past 6 months prior to surgical procedures;
  • pregnant women or lactating mothers;
  • furcation involvement in molars with periapical disease;
  • cervical restorations or prosthesis closer than 1 mm to fornix.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: collagen membrane associated to anorganic bone
Complete debridement of the osseous defects and thorough scaling and root planing using mini curettes and ultrasonic scalers were performed. The sites were randomly selected for treatment with resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide® Perio) associated to anorganic bovine bone matrix + collagen (Bio-Oss® Collagen) . The membranes were trimmed to cover the lesions and extended to the adjacent bone between 2 to 3 mm apically and laterally. They were then placed in position, 2 mm below the CEJ, and fixed in position using sling 5-0 vicryl sutures. The flaps were coronally positioned until completely covering the membranes without tension and sutured with 5-0 nylon sutures
Procedure: guided tissue regeneration with using an absorbable collagen membrane associated with inorganic bovine bone associated.
Dental surgical procedures that use barrier membranes to direct the growth of new bone and gingival tissue at sites with insufficient volumes or dimensions of bone or gingiva for proper function, esthetics or prosthetic restoration. Using an absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide® Perio) associated with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen matrix (Bio-Oss® Collagen).
Other Names:
  • GTR
Active Comparator: collagen membrane alone
Complete debridement of the osseous defects and thorough scaling and root planing using mini curettes and ultrasonic scalers were performed. The sites were randomly selected for treatment with resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide® Perio). The membranes were trimmed to cover the lesions and extended to the adjacent bone between 2 to 3 mm apically and laterally. They were then placed in position, 2 mm below the CEJ, and fixed in position using sling 5-0 vicryl sutures. The flaps were coronally positioned until completely covering the membranes without tension and sutured with 5-0 nylon sutures
Procedure: guided tissue regeneration with using an absorbable collagen membrane associated or not with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen matrix.
dental surgical procedures that use barrier membranes to direct the growth of new bone and gingival tissue at sites with insufficient volumes or dimensions of bone or gingiva for proper function, esthetics or prosthetic restoration. Using an absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide® Perio) alone.
Other Names:
  • GTR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
to evaluate clinical attachment level
Time Frame: The clinical periodontal parameter will be recorded at baseline (pre-intervention) and +360 days after the surgical periodontal therapy.]
Change from Baseline in clinical attachment level at +360 days
The clinical periodontal parameter will be recorded at baseline (pre-intervention) and +360 days after the surgical periodontal therapy.]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tomographic bone gain
Time Frame: The Tomographic bone gain parameter will be recorded at baseline (pre-intervention) and +360 days after the surgical periodontal therapy.]
Change from Baseline in bone gain at +360 days
The Tomographic bone gain parameter will be recorded at baseline (pre-intervention) and +360 days after the surgical periodontal therapy.]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Sao Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2008.1.1259.58.9

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontal Diseases

Clinical Trials on guided tissue regeneration with using an absorbable collagen membrane associated with inorganic bovine bone associated.

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings