Self-management EdUcation and SuPport to Promote PsychOsocial Health Among StRoke Survivors and Informal Caregivers in a VirTual Stroke Community (SUPPORT) (SUPPORT)
Self-management EdUcation and SuPport to Promote PsychOsocial Health Among StRoke Survivors and Informal Caregivers in a VirTual Stroke Community (SUPPORT): A Pilot Project
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Stroke survivors that have experienced an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke event and their caregivers
- can read, write, and speak English
- are able to provide written consent
- are computer literate (have used a computer for ≥1 month)
- have access to a computer with broadband internet at home
- understand how to use the Internet (accessed the Internet on ≥2 occasions)
Exclusion Criteria:
- reside outside of the home
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of <9 indicating moderate to severe impairment
- Caregivers that provide long-distance care. I
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment
|
Phase 1 of the study will be a one-time meeting, either remote or in-person to complete V.E.
training and fill out questionnaires.
Phase 2 of the study is the 8 week intervention implementation.Participants will access the V.E.
community from their homes on a computer with broadband internet.
During the first four weeks of the intervention, participants will be required to come into the V.E. at least once per week for at least one hour.
For the last four weeks, V.E.
participation is strongly encouraged, but not required.
The content in the V.E. will focus on psychosocial health and stroke recovery, and the messaging in the VE will be updated bi-weekly to encourage retention and engagement.
Group meetings led by the study PI, a psychologist, or another trained member of the research team at least once a week will be offered.
During the intervention period, VE-specific data will be collected continuously.
Phase 3, will include a survey and a focus group interview via online platform.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants enrolled in the study
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks from baseline of last participant )
|
This will be defined as the number enrolled divided by the number of eligible individuals screened
|
post intervention (8 weeks from baseline of last participant )
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who complete the study
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks from baseline of last participant )
|
post intervention (8 weeks from baseline of last participant )
|
|
|
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who complete the data collection forms
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks from baseline of last participant )
|
post intervention (8 weeks from baseline of last participant )
|
|
|
Usability as assessed by the perceived usefulness score
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Usability as assessed by the perceived ease of use scores
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
This has 10 items, each scored form 1(strongly disagree) to 5(strongly agree), higher score meaning higher perceived ease of use
|
post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Usability as assessed by the number of times the participants log in
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Usability as assessed by the time spent in the environment in minutes
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Acceptability as assessed by the number of VE Meetings attended
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
post intervention (8 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Acceptability as assessed by the number of VE objects manipulated
Time Frame: post intervention (8 weeks form baseline)
|
Objects manipulated are the resources interacted with
|
post intervention (8 weeks form baseline)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in perceived social support as assessed by the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is a 12 item scale , each question is scored from 1(very strongly disagree) to 7(very strongly agree) for a maximum score of score of 84, a higher number indicating more social support
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in post stroke depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is a 9 item questionnaire, each scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day), a higher number indication g more depression
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is a 7 item questionnaire, each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day) a higher number indicating more anxiety
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in loneliness as assessed by the UCLA loneliness scale scores
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is a 20 item questionnaire, each one is scored form 1(never) to 4(always).
Scores for questions 1,5,6,9,10,15,16,19 and 20 are reversed(i.e.
1=4,2=3,3=2,4=1)and the scores for each item is then summed together, higher number indicating more loneliness
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in caregiver burden as assessed by the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is a 22 item questionnaire,each one scored from 0(never)-4(nearly always) higher core indicating more burden
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in self efficacy ( ability to perform tasks or behaviors) as assessed by the PROMIS General Self-efficacy Form
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is a 10 item questionnaire, each one is scored from 1(not at all true) to 4(exactly true), a higher number indicating a better outcome
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in emotional support as assessed by the NIH Emotional Support Form
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is an 8 item questionnaire, and each is scored form 1(never)-5(always), for a maximum score of 40, a higher number indicating higher levels of emotional support
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in instrumental support as assessed by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is an 8 item questionnaire, and each is scored form 1(never)-5(always), for a maximum score of 40, a higher number indicating higher levels of instrumental support
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in ability to recover form stress as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is a 6 item questionnaire scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) a higher number indicating a better outcome?
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
|
Change in the amount that pain interferes with daily life as assessed by the PROMIS Short Form Pain Interference v 1.0 8a
Time Frame: Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
This is an 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) a higher number indicating a worse outcome
|
Baseline, post intervention (8 weeks after baseline)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jennifer Beauchamp, PhD, RN, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-SN-21-1005
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
NCT07208422RecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After Stroke
-
NCT07224178RecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, Embolic
-
NCT07433972Not yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Survivors
-
NCT07236216RecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Patient
-
NCT04956185RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic
-
NCT05046106Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
NCT07199322Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke Ischemic
-
NCT07353203CompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Exoskeleton
-
NCT06127602RecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, Cerebrovascular
-
NCT05815368RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic
Clinical Trials on Learning in a Virtual Environment (LIVE)
-
NCT06718881Completed
-
NCT04074655CompletedDementia | Spatial Navigation | Navigation, Spatial
-
NCT06949501Completed
-
NCT03215485CompletedChildhood Obesity Prevention
-
NCT06421480Not yet recruitingMachine Learning | Dangerous Behavior
-
NCT04266444CompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Parkinson Disease
-
NCT03515746Completed
-
NCT03499002WithdrawnLaceration | Sutured Laceration