Effectiveness of Home Programs After Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery
The Effect of Different Home Programs on Pain and Mobility Gain After Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Fatih Özden, PhD
- Phone Number: +90 543 433 4593
- Email: fatihozden@mu.edu.tr
Study Locations
-
-
Osmangazi
-
Bursa, Osmangazi, Turkey
- Bursa Çekirge State Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having undergone lumbar decompression surgery without fusion and 2 months of history
- Participate in all necessary follow-up assessments
- Being between 18-65 years old
- Understand simple commands
- Signing the consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of a previous spinal fusion surgery
- Presence of malignancy
- Having undergone spine surgery before
- Have any other orthopedic or neurological problem that may affect treatment and assessments
- Situations that prevent communication
- Lack of cooperation during the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group
This program will include reeducation isometric contraction exercises for transversus obdominus, oblique abdominals, multifidus lumborum muscles and strengthening stretching exercises for other extremities.
These interventions will be sent to the patients via telerehabitation method and the patients will always have access to the programs and training.
|
The study group will be given a core stabilization program in addition to education.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
The control group will receive post-operative exercise training and will be encouraged to move as described by Moseley et al., 2004.
|
The control group will receive post-operative cognitive training and will be encouraged to move.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline VAS at 8 weeks
|
On a 10 cm straight line or numeric scale, the patient is asked to mark the pain they feel (0: no pain, 10: excruciating pain).
|
Change from Baseline VAS at 8 weeks
|
|
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline TSK at 8 weeks
|
The questionnaire is a 17-item scale developed to measure fear of movement/reinjury.
The normal score range is between 17 and 68.
|
Change from Baseline TSK at 8 weeks
|
|
Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline PCS at 8 weeks
|
Scale is used to assess the patient's feelings and thoughts about pain and disaster.
The total score ranges from 0 to 52 points.
A high score indicates a bad situation.
|
Change from Baseline PCS at 8 weeks
|
|
Functional Reach Test (FRT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline FRT at 8 weeks
|
The subject stands sideways next to a wall and flexes the shoulder 90 degrees.
The 3rd metacarpal level is marked on the wall.
The subject reaches as far as he/she can without taking a step.
The 3rd metacarpal line is marked again.
The difference between the marks is measured and noted.
|
Change from Baseline FRT at 8 weeks
|
|
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline RMDQ at 8 weeks
|
The RMDQ is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items reflecting various activities of daily living.
Each item is scored 1 if it is declared applicable to the participant and 0 otherwise, so that the total score can range from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability).
|
Change from Baseline RMDQ at 8 weeks
|
|
Lumbar region flexibility in flexion extension lateral flexion directions
Time Frame: Change from Baseline flexibilty tests at 8 weeks
|
The subject stands on a block and then performs lumlal flexion with knees straight.
The distance above the block with the finger is recorded with a negative sign and the distance below the block is recorded with a positive sign.
The subject stands in front of a wall.
The pelvis and trunk should be in contact with the wall.
The subject is asked to perform lumbar extension.
The distance between the sternal notch and the wall is measured and noted.
The subject stands in front of a wall with hands next to the trunk.
The subject is asked to perform lumbar lateral flexion.
The distance from the first position to the last position is measured using the middle finger as a base and noted.
|
Change from Baseline flexibilty tests at 8 weeks
|
|
Lumbar region endurance flexor and extensor
Time Frame: Change from Baseline endurance tests at 8 weeks
|
The participant is placed prone on a treatment bed with the upper edge of the iliac crests flush with the edge of the bed.
The lower body is secured to the bed with two straps.
At the beginning of the test, participants cross their arms over their chest and remain in a neutral position for as long as possible.
The time the position can be maintained is measured using a stopwatch.
Participants are held in a supine position with both hips and knees flexed 90 degrees and the trunk flexed 60 degrees on a wedge.
Stabilization is achieved with support from the back of the foot.
After the wedge is moved back 10 cm, the participants maintain their body position for as long as possible.
The time from the moment the wedge is moved back to the moment the participant re-establishes contact with the wedge is measured.
|
Change from Baseline endurance tests at 8 weeks
|
|
Stair Climbing Test (SCT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline SCT at 8 weeks
|
The time (in seconds) taken to ascend and descend one flight of stairs is noted.
A 9-step ladder with a 20 cm step height and a handrail is used.
You are instructed to ascend and descend the stairs as quickly but safely as possible.
The use of a handrail and walking aid is allowed if necessary.
Timing starts with the start signal and ends when the participant has lowered both feet to ground level.
The participant can stop and rest if necessary, but the timing continues.
|
Change from Baseline SCT at 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Fatih Özden, PhD, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
- Principal Investigator: Mustafa Yalçın, MSc, Bursa Çekirge State Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Baki Umut Tuğay, PhD, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Bursa NRŞ RKÇ
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spine Disease
-
NCT05448092Active, not recruitingLumbar Spine Disease | Lumbar Spine Instability | Instabilities Lumbar
-
NCT05405374RecruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Spondylosis | Lumbar Spine Disease | Lumbar Spine Instability
-
NCT04189341WithdrawnLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Disc Disease | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine Instability
-
NCT05596227CompletedAnalgesia | Lumbar Spine Disease
-
NCT06462729RecruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Lumbar Disc Disease | Spine Disease | Lumbar Spine Degeneration
-
NCT05345249CompletedLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Fusion of Spine | Spinal Fusion | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Disc Disease | Lumbar Spondylosis | Lumbar Spine Disease | Lumbar Radiculitis
-
NCT05334212TerminatedLumbar Spine Surgeries | Cervical Spine Surgeries
-
NCT04140344RecruitingLumbar Spondylosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine Instability
Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation
-
NCT04201691CompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Postural Balance | Cervical Region Disorder Nos | Muscle Tonus | Proprioception
-
NCT05809401RecruitingStroke | Schizophrenia | Traumatic Brain Injury
-
NCT05462678CompletedMultiple Sclerosis
-
NCT03842735CompletedAdolescent | Child | Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
-
NCT04496609Recruiting
-
NCT05954741RecruitingCognitive Impairment | Dementia | Vascular Dementia | Dementia, Mixed | Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
-
NCT02579954CompletedPulmonary Arterial Hypertension
-
NCT05419310RecruitingLow Back Pain | Rehabilitation | Orthopedic Disorder | Physical Therapy | Core Strengthening