Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block

October 26, 2022 updated by: Mona Mohamed Mogahed, Tanta University

Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries;Randomized Controlled Trial

Aim of this Study will be to compare Ultrasound guided erector spinae block vs thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block in lumbar spine surgeries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A total of 120 patients who will be scheduled for single-level lumbar discectomy and laminectomy surgery under general anesthesia will be included in this trial between October 2022 to March 2023.

Inclusion criteria:

The participants will be aged between 20 and 65 years, and will be classified per the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification as ASA I-II.

The exclusion criteria Will be a history of coagulation abnormality, anticoagulant treatment, allergies to local anesthetics, skin infections at the site of block area, pregnancy or lactation, and refusal to participate in the study.

A computer program will be used to randomize the participants into 3 groups. Each group (mTLIP block, ESPB, and control) will compose of 40 patients. All patients will be monitored with the standard ASA criteria, electrocardiography, noninvasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. Midazolam (2 mg) will be administered intravenously (IV) for sedation. Anesthesia induction will be performed with IV propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg), fentanyl (1-1.5 mg/kg), and rocuronium bromide (0.9 mg/ kg). The patients will be placed in the prone position following intubation. Sevoflurane will be used in a mixture of oxygen and fresh air for anesthesia maintenance. Fentanil will be administered for intraoperative analgesia according to the baseline heart rate and mean arterial pressure of the patients. The intraoperative data (heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, noninvasive arterial pressure, and end-tidal carbon dioxide level) will be recorded at 5-minute intervals during the operation. All patients will do lumbar spine surgery by the same surgical team using the same technique.

Block Technique After the induction of anesthesia, either the US-guided mTLIP block or ESPB will be performed in the prone position.A 22G sonovisible block needle with a length of 100 mm will be used to create a puncture. The control group will not receive any intervention. ESPB Technique. In the ESPB group, the probe will be placed in the parasagittal plane at the level of the L3 vertebrae. The spinous process will be visualized, and the probe will move 3 cm laterally from the midline. The erector spinae muscle will be visualized above the transverse process. The needle will be punctured in the craniocaudal direction using the in-plane technique. The needle will be directed superior to the transverse process. Then, 2 mL normal saline solution was injected into the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle to confirm the proper injection site. After ensuring the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered. The same ESPB procedure will be performed on the other side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered. mTLIP Technique In the mTLIP group, the probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. The spinous process and the interspinous muscles (i.e., multifidus, longissimus, and iliocostalis) will be visualized as the anatomic guide points. The probe will move laterally to identify the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles. The needle will be inserted between the longissimus and iliocostalis in the medial-to-lateral direction using the in-plane technique. After confirming the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered. The same mTLIP procedure will be performed on the opposite side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine will be administered. A dose of 1 g paracetamol and 100 mg of tramadol will be administered IV at the end of the surgery to all patients in the mTLIP, ESPB, and control groups. The patients will be extubated after exhibiting sufficient spontaneous respiration and will be transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). After they attained a modified Aldrete score of 12, the patients will be discharged from the PACU. Standard Postoperative Analgesia Protocol and Measurement of Pain. The postoperative analgesic treatment will be managed using the classic protocol of our department. At the PACU, a fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device will be attached to the patients. The PCA device will be prepared with the following protocol: no infusion dose, a 2-mL (10 µ/ml) bolus, a 20-minute lockout time, and a 4-hour limit of 200 mg. IV 1 g paracetamol was ordered every 6 hours postoperatively. A pain nurse anesthetist, who will be blinded to the trial, will evaluate and record the opioid consumption and the pain scores using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain). Passive (at rest) and active (while mobilized) VAS scores were recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8 and16 hours during the postoperative period. If VAS was higher than or equal to 4, IV meperidine (0.5 mg/kg) will be administered as rescue analgesia within the postoperative 24-hour period. The opioid-related adverse effects (itching, nausea, vomiting, etc.) and the block procedure times will be also recorded. The block procedure time is defined as the time interval from the start of the visualization of the sonoanatomy to the injection of the local anesthetic solution.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification as ASA I-II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • coagulation abnormality
  • anticoagulant treatment,
  • allergies to local anesthetics,
  • skin infections at the site of block area,
  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • refusal to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: control group
Patients will not recieve either erector spinae plane block nor thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
Induction of anesthesia will be by IV propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg)
Other Names:
  • Intravenous anesthesia
Fentanyl will be injected during the induction of anesthesia (1-1.5 mg/kg)
Other Names:
  • Intravenous narcotic
Rocuronium will be injected during induction of anesthesia (0.6 mg/ kg)
Other Names:
  • Muscle relaxant
Sevoflurane inhalationa anesthesia will be used for maintainance of anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Inhalational anesthetic
Active Comparator: Erector spinae plane block
Patients will recieve ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block.
Induction of anesthesia will be by IV propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg)
Other Names:
  • Intravenous anesthesia
Fentanyl will be injected during the induction of anesthesia (1-1.5 mg/kg)
Other Names:
  • Intravenous narcotic
Rocuronium will be injected during induction of anesthesia (0.6 mg/ kg)
Other Names:
  • Muscle relaxant
Sevoflurane inhalationa anesthesia will be used for maintainance of anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Inhalational anesthetic
In the ESPB group, the probe will be placed in the parasagittal plane at the level of the L3 vertebrae. The spinous process will be visualized, and the probe will move 3 cm laterally from the midline. The erector spinae muscle will be visualized above the transverse process. The needle will be punctured in the craniocaudal direction using the in-plane technique. The needle will be directed superior to the transverse process . Then, 2 mL normal saline solution was injected into the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle to confirm the proper injection site. After ensuring the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered. The same ESPB procedure will be performed on the other side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
Active Comparator: Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
Patients will recieve ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block.
Induction of anesthesia will be by IV propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg)
Other Names:
  • Intravenous anesthesia
Fentanyl will be injected during the induction of anesthesia (1-1.5 mg/kg)
Other Names:
  • Intravenous narcotic
Rocuronium will be injected during induction of anesthesia (0.6 mg/ kg)
Other Names:
  • Muscle relaxant
Sevoflurane inhalationa anesthesia will be used for maintainance of anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Inhalational anesthetic
In the mTLIP group, the probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. The spinous process and the interspinous muscles (i.e., multifidus, longissimus, and iliocostalis) will be visualized as the anatomic guide points. The probe will move laterally to identify the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles. The needle will be inserted between the longissimus and iliocostalis in the medial-to-lateral direction using the in-plane technique. After confirming the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered. The same mTLIP procedure will be performed on the opposite side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic effect
Time Frame: 2 hours postoperatively

Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain .

Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).

2 hours postoperatively
Analgesic effect
Time Frame: 4 hours postoperatively
Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
4 hours postoperatively
Analgesic effect
Time Frame: 6 hours postoperatively
Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
6 hours postoperatively
Analgesic effect
Time Frame: 8 hours postoperatively
Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
8 hours postoperatively
Analgesic effect
Time Frame: 16 hours postoperatively
Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
16 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 20, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Propofol

3
Subscribe