Study of Liver Fibrosis Stage Assessment by Fibroblast Activation Protein Imaging in Patients With Biopsy for Suspected or Proven Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (HEFITEP)

February 8, 2024 updated by: Elodie CHEVALIER, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Pilot Study of Liver Fibrosis Stage Assessment by Tep Fibroblast Activation Protein Imaging (68Ga-FAPI-46 TEP/TDM) in Patients With Biopsy for Suspected or Proven Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), estimated to be 17% prevalent in France, can lead to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which in turn can progress to fibrosis, the ultimate stage of which is cirrhosis, a major cause of liver transplantation. The prevalence of NASH is increasing worldwide, along with that of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Significant liver fibrosis is estimated to affect at least 2.6% of the adult population in France.

The prognosis of patients with NASH is directly linked to the stage of liver fibrosis determined by biopsy, and these biopsies must now be repeated to assess the effect of treatments. Hepatic fibrosis is traditionally classified into five stages, from the absence of fibrosis (F0) to severe cirrhosis (F4), and passage from one stage to another is considered to demonstrate significant variation, likely to impact prognosis.

However, liver biopsy is painful. It can only analyze a very small proportion of liver volume (1/50,000), whereas the distribution of fibrosis is generally heterogeneous. Above all, biopsy is not devoid of risks, primarily hemorrhage, which can sometimes be severe or even fatal.

In line with current recommendations, clinical-biological algorithms, as well as ultrasound elastography or MRI, are used to assess the risk of fibrosis and the value of a liver biopsy. Generally speaking, these tests have the advantage of very good negative predictive values, making it possible to exclude the possibility of significant fibrosis in a large proportion of patients. However, their positive predictive values are weaker, even when these tests are combined. Above all, they do not allow us to follow the evolution of the fibrosis stage over time. This is why liver biopsies remain indispensable for determining the stage and severity of hepatic fibrosis and monitoring its evolution. It is therefore essential to develop more precise, non-invasive methods for accurately assessing the extent of liver fibrosis. This is the objective of the FreSH national cohort, which uses conventional biological techniques and in which our patients will also be included.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), estimated to be 17% prevalent in France, can lead to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which in turn can progress to fibrosis, the ultimate stage of which is cirrhosis, a major cause of liver transplantation. The prevalence of NASH is increasing worldwide, along with that of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Significant liver fibrosis is estimated to affect at least 2.6% of the adult population in France The prognosis of patients with NASH is directly linked to the stage of liver fibrosis determined by biopsy, and these biopsies must now be repeated to assess the effect of treatments. Hepatic fibrosis is traditionally classified into five stages, from the absence of fibrosis (F0) to severe cirrhosis (F4), and passage from one stage to another is considered to demonstrate significant variation, likely to impact prognosis.

However, liver biopsy is painful. It can only analyze a very small proportion of liver volume (1/50,000), whereas the distribution of fibrosis is generally heterogeneous. Above all, biopsy is not devoid of risks, primarily hemorrhage, which can sometimes be severe or even fatal.

In line with current recommendations, clinical-biological algorithms, as well as ultrasound elastography or MRI, are used to assess the risk of fibrosis and the value of a liver biopsy. Generally speaking, these tests have the advantage of very good negative predictive values, making it possible to exclude the possibility of significant fibrosis in a large proportion of patients. However, their positive predictive values are weaker, even when these tests are combined. Above all, they do not allow us to follow the evolution of the fibrosis stage over time. This is why liver biopsies remain indispensable for determining the stage and severity of hepatic fibrosis and monitoring its evolution. It is therefore essential to develop more precise, non-invasive methods for accurately assessing the extent of liver fibrosis. This is the objective of the FreSH national cohort, which uses conventional biological techniques and in which our patients will also be included.

The hypothesis behind this initial pilot study is that 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging, which targets fibroblast activating protein (FAP), could provide a precise assessment of the severity and stages of liver fibrosis, as well as its distribution throughout the liver volume, and could ultimately be a useful tool for non-invasive monitoring of patients undergoing treatment. This technique has already been validated for the detection of numerous cancers, including hepatocarcinomas, and is capable of assessing renal fibrosis (pilot study with 15 patients), with a good correlation to biopsy and a direct link to glomerular filtration rate.

Targeted receptor (FAP) data also strongly support our hypothesis:

  • FAP expression is negligible in healthy livers and proportional to the degree of fibrosis in pathological livers.
  • Low plasma FAP concentrations rule out the hypothesis of hepatic fibrosis. PAF inhibitors also represent a very promising avenue of therapeutic research in NASH.

The HEFITEP study will assess for the first time the discriminative power of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for grading liver fibrosis with reference to centrally analyzed liver biopsy in patients biopsied for suspected or proven non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals with recent liver biopsy for suspected or confirmed NASH
  2. Individuals of legal age, who have received full information on the organization of the research and have signed an informed consent form.
  3. Person, affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme.
  4. Person who has undergone a preliminary clinical examination appropriate to the research.
  5. Histological stage of fibrosis obtained at biopsy in accordance with the planned numbers (an equivalent number of patients with histological stages >2 and ≤ 2 must be recruited in each center, and a number of at least 16 patients must be included by all centers in each of the 4 groups of histological stages of fibrosis).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known hypersensitivity to 68Ga-FAPI-46 or to any of the excipients or components of the radiopharmaceutical.
  2. Infection with HCV/HBV.
  3. Decompensated cirrhosis (ascites, hepatic insufficiency, hepatorenal syndrome, etc.).
  4. Known hepatocellular carcinoma.
  5. Steatogenic treatment (corticosteroid, Tamoxifen, Amiodarone, Methotrexate).
  6. Excessive alcohol consumption in the last 5 years (>210 g/week in men, >140 g/week in women).
  7. Clinically unstable state not suitable for 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT scan.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: TEP 68Ga-FAPI
Use of a positron emission tomograph equipped with an X-ray scanner (PET/CT), essential for recording images after injection of a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical (in this study, 68Ga-FAPI-46).
Drug: PET scan of 68Ga-FAPI
Use of a positron emission tomograph equipped with an X-ray scanner (PET/CT), essential for recording images after injection of a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical (in this study, 68Ga-FAPI-46).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Capture intensity measurement
Time Frame: 1 year
Measurement of 68Ga-FAPI-46 uptake intensity, with standardized uptake values in areas centred on the biopsy sites, the reference then being a classification of fibrosis stages determined by centralized biopsy rereading
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standardized Uptake Value threshold values associated with each of the four fibrosis histological stage groups
Time Frame: 1 year
Standardized Uptake Value threshold values associated with each of the four fibrosis histological stage groups (stages 4, 3, 2 and < 2) by the naive Bayes classifier.
1 year
Localization of the capture zone with maximum activity
Time Frame: 1 year
Localization of the capture zone with maximum activity (SUVmax and SUV pic zones, respectively)
1 year
Search, on whole-body images, for 68Ga-FAPI-46 uptake
Time Frame: 1 year
Search, on whole-body images, for 68Ga-FAPI-46 uptake foci located outside the tracer's normal elimination zones (urinary excretory tracts), and which may correspond to abnormal areas of fibrosis and/or inflammation, or even cancer
1 year
Intra-class correlation coefficients
Time Frame: 1 year
Intra-class correlation coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals.
1 year
Variation in the degree of prediction of the four groups of histological stages of fibrosis
Time Frame: 1 year
Variation in the degree of prediction of the four groups of histological stages of fibrosis when variables from 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT are added to variables from usual clinical-biological scores
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2022PI044

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Clinical Trials on PET scan of 68Ga-FAPI

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings