Non-Pharmacological Methods in Reducing Injection Pain (Randomized)
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Non-Pharmacological Methods in Reducing Injection Pain in Preschool Children: Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sakarya, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Sakarya University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children aged between 4 and 6 years,
- An intramuscular (IM) medication order was prescribed by a physician,
- The IM injection was administered in the pediatric emergency department,
- No history of chronic pain-causing illness,
- No diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders,
- Had not received any analgesic medications in the past 6 hours,
- No history of syncope (fainting) during previous injections,
No diagnosis of mental retardation,
- No scar tissue or muscle atrophy at the intended injection site,
- Body mass index (BMI) percentile between the 10th and 90th percentiles for age and gender,
- Both child and parent provided informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria;
- Participants were excluded from the study if:
- The child was younger than 4 or older than 6 years,
- There was scar tissue or muscle atrophy at the injection site,
- The child or parent had communication difficulties,
- The child's BMI was below the 10th percentile (cachectic) or above the 90th percentile (obese),
- Either the child or parent declined to participate in the research.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: intervention group Palm
Palm stimulator
|
The Palm Stimulator is 1.6 cm in diameter and 4 cm in length, and has a cylindrical, non-slip, and easy-to-grip structure designed to maximize palm contact.
The Palm Stimulator is used by gripping it in the palm during injection.
The device has blunt protrusions all around the palm to provide tactile stimulation.
These blunt protrusions do not penetrate the skin but, according to gate control theory, create stimulation and close the pain gate in the spinal cord, reducing the pain perceived during injection.
The researcher will show the Palm Stimulator, the device providing tactile stimulation, and allow examination.
Twenty seconds before the injection, the Palm Stimulator will be placed in the palm of the child's dominant hand so that the child can grasp it.
The child will be instructed to hold the device firmly in their palm throughout the procedure.
After the injection is complete, the device will be removed from the child.
|
|
Experimental: intervention group ShotBloker
ShotBloker device
|
ShotBlocker is a flat, horseshoe-shaped device used to reduce pain during subcutaneous or intramuscular (IM) injections.
It features short, blunt, non-sharp projections approximately 2 mm in height and is designed to be placed against the skin, with a central opening that exposes the injection site.
The device is applied to the skin just prior to injection, with its textured surface making contact with the skin.
Although the projections do not penetrate the skin, they are believed to create a sensory stimulus associated with pain modulation based on the gate control theory.
|
|
Experimental: intervention group HSTT
HSTT application
|
Helfer Skin Tap Technique: After determining the injection site, gently tap the skin several times with the fingertips of the dominant (most commonly used) hand for approximately 5 seconds to relax the muscle.
After the skin is wiped with antiseptic solution and stretched, the cap of the syringe in the dominant (most commonly used) hand is opened.
A large V is made with the thumb and index finger of the non-dominant hand.
The skin is tapped three times quickly using the whole hand to stimulate the major muscle fibers.
The nurse/midwife counts to 3, and the needle is inserted into the muscle at a 90-degree angle simultaneously.
To remove the needle from the skin, the skin is tapped three times quickly (again in a V shape) with the whole non-dominant hand, and the needle is withdrawn simultaneously with the final tap (tapping).
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
Rutin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale was used to assess self-reported pain levels.
This scale consists of six facial expressions ranging from "no hurt" (0) to "hurts worst" (10), allowing children to select the face that best represents their level of pain.
|
6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TiryakiÖ.
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
NCT00866164Approved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
NCT07190807RecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg Pain
-
NCT03727373CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, Cancer
-
NCT03597737CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Oncology
-
NCT07454083Not yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
NCT01576978CompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
NCT07274293CompletedCervical Pain | Pain Management | Lumbar Pain | Muscular | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck)
-
NCT07144033Not yet recruitingPain, Acute | Chronic Post Operative Pain | Pain, Chronic
-
NCT05616702RecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back Pain
-
NCT04727749CompletedPain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Intractable
Clinical Trials on Palm
-
NCT06772259CompletedTo Compare the Effect of Two Different Nonpharmacological Methods on Pain and Fear During Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization
-
NCT07541300Active, not recruiting
-
NCT07466485Not yet recruiting
-
NCT02897674CompletedHealthy Volunteers
-
NCT07387497Not yet recruitingCancer | Anxiety | Procedural Pain | Catheterization, Peripheral Venous | Fear Needles